Abstract
In this retrospective, I chronicle the development of the crossvergence theory of values evolution, which states: it is the dynamic interaction of the sociocultural influences with the business ideology influences that provides the driving force to precipitate the development of new and unique values systems in societies. Crossvergence theory was introduced in our 1993 JIBS paper, and was the focus of our 1997 Decade Award paper, as well as of a series of subsequent papers. Thus I discuss the purpose and findings for six papers that have contributed to our present level of knowledge concerning crossvergence theory. I conclude my comments with a discussion of the relevance of longitudinal and multilevel research, measures found to be useful, and methodologies to consider, as well as identifying research topics in need of exploration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The “influence-type” terminology that I am using to describe this study was developed many years after the writing of this study.
References
Andrews, T. G., & Chompusri, N. 2005. Temporal dynamics of crossvergence: Institutionalizing MNC integration strategies in post-crisis ASEAN. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22 (1): 5–22.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. 1999. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. 2004. Generation cohorts and personal values: A comparison of China and the United States. Organization Science, 15 (2): 210–220.
Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kelley, L., MacNab, B., & Worthley, R. 2006. Crossvergence and cultural tendencies: A longitudinal test of the Hong Kong, Taiwan and United States banking sectors. Journal of International Management, 12 (1): 67–84.
McSweeney, B. 2002. Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55 (1): 89–118.
Negandhi, A. R. 1975. Comparative management and organizational theory: A marriage needed. Academy of Management Journal, 18 (2): 334–344.
Ralston, D. A. 2007. Cuba: A comparison of work values on Castro's island with those in the United States. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49 (6): 655–669.
Ralston, D. A., Gustafson, D. J., Cheung, F., & Terpstra, R. H. 1993. Differences in managerial values: A study of US, Hong Kong and PRC managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (2): 249–275.
Ralston, D. A., Yu, K. C., Wang, X., Terpstra, R. H., & He, W. 1996. The cosmopolitan Chinese manager: Findings of a study on managerial values across the six regions of China. Journal of International Management, 2 (2): 79–109.
Ralston, D. A., Holt, D. A., Terpstra, R. H., & Yu, K. C. 1997. The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: A study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (1): 177–208.
Ralston, D. A., Nguyen, V. T., & Napier, N. K. 1999a. A comparative study of the work values of North and South Vietnamese managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (4): 655–672.
Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Stewart, S., Terpstra, R. H., & Yu, K. C. 1999b. Doing business in the 21st century with the new generation of Chinese managers: A study of generational shifts in work values in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (2): 415–428.
Ralston, D. A., Pounder, J., Lo, C. W. H., Wong, Y. Y., Egri, C. P., & Stauffer, J. 2006a. Stability and change in managerial work values: A longitudinal study of China, Hong Kong and the US. Management and Organization Review, 2 (1): 67–94.
Ralston, D. A., Terpstra-Tong, J., Terpstra, R. H., Wang, X., & Egri, C. P. 2006b. Today's state-owned enterprises of China: Are they dying dinosaurs or dynamic dynamos? Strategic Management Journal, 27 (9): 825–843.
Riddle, L., Ralston, D. A., Melahi, K., Butt, A. N., & Dalig, T. 2007. Middle East managerial values: Evidence from five countries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA. Available from lriddle@gwu.edu.
Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. 2000. National cultures: Implications for organizational structure and behavior. In N. N. Ashkanasy, C. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds), The handbook of organizational culture and climate: 417–436. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Schwartz, S. H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25 1–65. New York: Academic Press.
Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 519–535.
Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. 1998. Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Webber, R. H. 1969. Convergence or divergence. Columbia Journal of World Business, 4 (3): 75–83.
Acknowledgements
I would like to note that a multitude of colleagues have been an inspiration over the years in my development of the crossvergence perspective. In particular, however, I specifically would like to acknowledge my co-authors who participated in the six studies that I include in this discussion of the evolution of my thinking regarding crossvergence theory. In alphabetical order, they are: Fanny Cheung, Carolyn P. Egri, David J. Gustafson, Wei He, David H. Holt, Carlos W. H. Lo, Nancy K. Napier, Van Thang Nguyen, James Pounder, Joseph Stauffer, Robert H. Terpstra, Xun Wang, Yim-Yu Wong, and Kai-cheng Yu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Arie Y Lewin, Editor-in-Chief, 13 September 2007.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ralston, D. The crossvergence perspective: reflections and projections. J Int Bus Stud 39, 27–40 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400333
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400333