Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

International business competence and the contemporary firm

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The trend of increasing internationalization of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) is noteworthy, because such firms typically have far fewer financial and tangible resources than large multinational enterprises. As a result, international business is often more challenging for smaller firms. In this study we investigate the widespread internationalization of SMEs, and specific factors that support their superior performance abroad. We uncover a collection of intangible capabilities that are especially salient to these firms and their growing international involvement. We identify international business competence (IBC) as an intangible, overarching firm resource that engenders superior international performance in the international SME. Through case studies and a comprehensive literature review, we identify four dimensions of IBC. We devise and assess a model that links IBC to SME international performance. Results suggest that international orientation, international marketing skills, international innovativeness, and international market orientation are all significant dimensions of IBC, and that IBC is instrumental in SME international performance. We discuss resultant findings and offer managerial implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J., & Overton, T. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Gima, K. 1995. The influence of new product factors on export propensity and performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Marketing, 3 (2): 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Sapienza, H., & Almeida, J. 2000. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 909–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1): 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. 1995. EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D. L., & Bearden, W. O. 1979. The effect of managerial attitudes on alternative exporting methods. Journal of International Business Studies, 10 (3): 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. D., Rose, G. M., Gilbert, F., & Ingram, T. N. 2001. Managing culturally diverse buyer–seller relationships: The role of intercultural disposition and adaptive selling in developing intercultural communication competence. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (4): 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan, J. W., Diamantopoulos, A., & de Mortanges, C. P. 1999. A measure of export market orientation: Scale development and cross-cultural validation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (4): 689–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan, J. W., Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. 2002. Export market-oriented activities: Their antecedents and performance consequences. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (3): 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calantone, R., & Knight, G. 2000. The critical role of product quality in the international performance of industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 29 (6): 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calantone, R., Kim, D., Schmidt, J., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2006. The influence of internal and external firm factors on international product adaptation strategy and export performance: A three-country comparison. Journal of Business Research, 59 (2): 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. 1994. Marketing strategy–performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A. 1979. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (1): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuushoo Kigyoo Cho 1995. Chuushoo kigyoo hakushoo (White paper on small and medium-size enterprise). Tokyo: Okura-sho Insatsu Kyoku (Treasury Department, Government of Japan).

  • Collis, D. 1991. A resource-based analysis of global competition. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Summer Special Issue): 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N., & McAuley, A. 1999. Internationalisation and the smaller firm: A review of contemporary empirical research. Management International Review, 39 (3): 223–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J., & Slevin, D. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10 (1): 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. S., & Douglas, S. P. 1996. Developing strategies for global markets: An evolutionary perspective. Columbia Journal of World Business, 31 (1): 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czinkota, M. 1982. Export development strategies: US promotion policies. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3): 555–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58 (4): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dev, C. S., Erramilli, M. K., & Agarwal, S. 2002. Brands across borders: Determining factors in choosing franchising or management contracts for entering international markets. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43 (6): 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35 (12): 1504–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, J. 2002. A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment. International Business Review, 11 (1): 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33 (3): 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. 2000. Building cross-cultural competence: How to create wealth from conflicting values. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equations Modeling, 6 (1): 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. 2001. Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (9): 899–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. 2000. A general theory of competition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. 1998. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62 (3): 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L., & Sohi, R. S. 2003. The development of interfirm partnership competence: Platforms for learning, learning activities, and consequences of learning. Journal of Business Research, 56 (9): 757–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. P., Lenartowicz, T., & Apud, S. 2006. Cross-cultural competence in international business: Toward a definition and a model. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (4): 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., Sorbom, D., Du Toit, S., & Du Toit, M. 2000. LISREL 8: New statistical features. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandemir, D., & Hult, G. T. 2005. A conceptualization of an organizational learning culture in international joint ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 34 (5): 440–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandwalla, P. 1977. The design of organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. 2000. Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8 (2): 12–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2004. Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (2): 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (4): 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A., & Jaworski, B. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M. 1990. Corporate product policy and innovative behavior of European and Japanese multinationals: An empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2): 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Duhan, D., Smith, D., & Wilson, R. D. 1991. The perceived veracity of PIMS strategy principles in Japan: An empirical inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 55 (1): 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. 2002. Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (2): 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, A. Y., & Massini, S. 2003. Knowledge creation and organizational capabilities of innovating and imitating firms. In H. Tsoukas & N. Mylonopoulos (Eds), Organizations as knowledge systems: 209–237. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., & Calantone, R. 1998. The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62 (4): 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G., & Dess, G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1): 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. 1995. The management of resources and the resource of management. Journal of Business Research, 33 (2): 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. 1994. Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9 (6): 469–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, S. K., & Chakravarthy, B. 2002. The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (4): 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, D., Conant, J., Varadarajan, P. R., & Mokwa, M. 1992. Success-producer and failure-preventer marketing skills: A social learning theory interpretation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20 (1): 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. 1984. Organizations: A quantum view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mort, G. S., & Weerawardena, J. 2006. Networking capability and international entrepreneurship: How networks function in Australian born global firms. International Marketing Review, 23 (5): 549–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J., & Slater, S. 1990. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54 (4): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5 (1): 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD 1997. Globalization and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (1): 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, A., & Wilson, D. 1996. A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24 (1): 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2001. The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27 (6): 803–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68 (2): 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68 (3): 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racela, O., Chaikittisilpa, C., & Thoumrungroje, A. 2007. Market orientation, international business relationships and perceived export performance. International Marketing Review, 24 (2): 144–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rialp, A., & Rialp, J. 2006. Faster and more successful exporters: An exploratory study of born global firms from the resource-based view. Journal of Euro-Marketing, 16 (1/2): 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. 2004. The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. Journal of Business Research, 57 (5): 548–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes, F., Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. 1996. Market orientation in United States and Scandinavian companies: A cross-cultural study. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. 1992. Market orientation, performance, and the moderating influence of competitive environment. Working Paper, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.

  • Slater, S., & Narver, J. 1994. Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58 (1): 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H., Marino, L., Weaver, K., & Dickson, P. 2000. The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 951–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (3): 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7): 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. 1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32 (5): 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, B., Souder, W., & Berkowitz, D. 2000. Market orientation and new product development in global industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 29 (6): 601–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Sinkovics, R., Cavusgil, S. T., & Roath, A. 2007. Overcoming export manufacturers’ dilemma in international expansion. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (2): 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. 1997. The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (6): 439–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 925–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. 1973. Innovations and organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2002. The GMS: A broad conceptualization of global marketing strategy and its effect on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 66 (4): 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    Gary A Knight & Daekwan Kim

Authors
  1. Gary A Knight
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daekwan Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary A Knight.

Additional information

Accepted by G Tomas M Hult, Departmental Editor, 10 September 2007. This paper has been with the authors for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knight, G., Kim, D. International business competence and the contemporary firm. J Int Bus Stud 40, 255–273 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400397

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400397

Keywords

Search

Navigation