Abstract
Nine foreign banks own the ten largest U.S. affiliates or subsidiaries of foreign banks. These account for 86% of the assets in affiliates and subsidiaries. Their histories suggest that most now represent an attempt by the parents to grow outside the confines of home markets. Original motives for their establishment have included ethnic banking and operational stability stemming from geographical dispersion. There is one major instance of acquiring capabilities, but it does not involve retail banking. The dispersal of national origins suggests that bank-specific capabilities are the primary source of the parents' competitive advantage. Being from English speaking countries also appears to help. Lastly, the growth of the affiliates and subsidiaries has not come from incremental growth but rather from a rearrangement of assets among banks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
*The author is a Senior Fellow of the Department of Management. His primary research interest is foreign direct investment in banking.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tschoegl, A. FDI and Internationalization: Evidence from U.S. Subsidiaries of Foreign Banks. J Int Bus Stud 33, 805–815 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491045
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491045