Skip to main content
Log in

Towards culturally responsive and responsible teaching of urban design

  • Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The era of globalisation is characterised by demands for ecological and cultural sustainability. Those demands request reintroduction of indigenous voices and values, recognition of the local and awareness about the particular. The post-colonial sensitivity asks for partnerships, rather than patronage. In that context internationalised design education needs to consider some new questions: Are Western ways of thinking (including analysis and design methods) directly applicable to the East? To what extent do educational, design and design research methods belong to the cultural contexts that have shaped them? Does the otherness of Oriental cultures demand new approaches? How to educate designers capable not only to recognise, but also to celebrate the difference of the other? Can, and should, design education of and for the other be deliberately and manifestly different from the usual practice? This paper argues that design education, research and practice should recognise the origins and the limits of their own theories, acknowledging that they carry both idio-lects and socio-lects. It also argues that the other can, and sometimes should remain the othereven that Derrida's tout autre. The paper is illustrated with examples from the author's own teaching and research experiences in cultures significantly different from his own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Illustration 1
Illustration 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The graduates from my international studios MOST/BMB include an Australian who now works in Bosnia; a Malaysian Chinese who practises architecture in Singapore; a Japanese and a Sri Lankan who stayed in Melbourne; an Indian who went to work in Hong Kong; an Australian in Tokyo, the other one in Saudi Arabia; a Bahraini who returned home, a Chinese who went back to contribute to the urban explosion of Shanghai and building explosion of the pre-Olympic Beijing; an Indonesian and a Thai who now teach in their own countries … They all helped me to become attentive of the other and increasingly able to learn about, and from the difference.

  2. I conducted MOST and BMB studios with my colleagues from the Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning of the University of Melbourne:

    • MOST 1998 (first international overseas design studio at the Faculty) with Ms Esther Charlesworth (fieldwork was organised in collaboration with the Institute for Protection of Cultural Heritage, Mostar);

    • MOST 1999 and 2000 with Dr Qinghua Guo (fieldwork was organised in collaboration with the Tsinghua University, Beijing and Architectural University, Xi’an);

    • BMB 2002 and 2003 with Professor Catherin Bull (fieldwork was organised in collaboration with the Kasetsart University, Bangkok and School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Bordeaux).

References

  • Alexander, C. (1977) A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashihara, Y. (1983) The Aesthetic Townscape. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashihara, Y. (1989) The Hidden Order. Tokyo, New York: Kodansha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Befu, H. and Kreiner, J. (eds.) (1992) Otherness of Japan. München: iudicium verlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berque, A. (1997) Japan, Cities and Social Bonds. Northamptonshire: Pilkington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (1986) The Myth of Japanese Uniqueness. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1995) The Gift of Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandelsonas, M. (1991) Urban Text. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huserl, E. (1960) Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1984) The Death and Life of a Great American Cities. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1996) Writings on Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (2003) The Cultural Imperative, Global Trends in the 21st Century. Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. and Lawrence-Zúñiga, D. (2003) The Anthropology of Space and Place. Malde, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Allester Jones, M. (1991) Gaston Bachelard, Subversive Humanist, Texts and Readings. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milosz, C. (2001) To Begin Where I Am. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, K. (1987a) An Inquiry Into the Good. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, K. (1987b) Intuition and Reflection in Self-Consciousness. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radovic, D. (2003a) Celebrating the difference: design-research and education for cultural sustainability, in: King, Panin and Parin (eds.) Modernity, Tradition, Culture, Water. Bangkok: The Kasetsart University Press, pp. 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radovic, D. (2003b) U potrazi za identitetom, in Modul, No. 17, Belgrade, pp. 36–40.

  • Radovic, D. (2004), The urbanities – the concept of urbanity in culturally diverse contexts, in: Monclús, FJ and Guàrdia, M (eds.) Planning models and the culture of cities, IPHS Conference Proceedings. Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. (ed.) (2002) Tangled Destinies: National Museum of Australia. Mulgrave, Vic.: Images Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relph, E. (1976) Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. (ed.) (1998) Georges Bataille, Essential Writings. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E.W. (1978) Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, E. (2003) The past in Tokyo's future – Koda Rohan's thoughts on urban reform and the new citizen in one nation's capital, in Fiévé, N. and Waley, P. (eds.) Japanese Capitals in Historical Perspective. London: Routledge Curzon, pp. 283–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheilds, R. (1999) Lefebvre, Love and Struggle. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. (1999) Learning from the Japanese City. London: E&FN Sponn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuhiwai Smith, Linda. (1999) Decolonizing Methodologies, Research and Indigenous Peoples. Dunedin: University of Otago Press, Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worton, M. (1998) Crossing boundaries or bridging gaps: translation, theory and questions of identity, in: Shields (Ed) Mattoid. Geelong: CRCC Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darko Radović.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radović, D. Towards culturally responsive and responsible teaching of urban design. Urban Des Int 9, 175–186 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000124

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000124

Keywords

Navigation