Skip to main content
Log in

Establishing measures and drivers of consumer brand engagement behaviours

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 November 2016

Abstract

Discussion of consumer brand engagement within the broader brand management literature adopts largely a psychological view for conceiving the nature of the construct. As a result, little focus has been devoted to consumer brand engagement behaviours – an aspect that has high managerial relevance. Of particular relevance are the challenges of establishing appropriate measures and better understanding the drivers of brand engagement behaviours. With the aim of addressing these challenges, this paper presents a theoretically-grounded and empirically-validated measure of consumer engagement behaviours based on the Actual Brand Engagement framework proposed by brand experts. This paper first establishes the framework’s suitability given the literature on engagement behaviours. The framework is conceptualised through demonstrating the importance of consumer brand knowledge, category involvement and corporate-level associations in driving engagement behaviours, thereby accommodating the role of brand-, category- and corporate-level factors. Using data collected from Australian consumers, the framework is empirically established by demonstrating: (1) the validity of the Actual Brand Engagement framework for measuring engagement behaviours and (2) the predictive validity in explaining a consumer’s willingness to pay a price premium. Cumulatively, this study addresses both the academic and managerial need for guidance as to how to best measure and influence brand engagement behaviours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D.A. (1991) Managing Brand Equity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D.A. (1996) Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review 38(3): 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adjei, M.T., Noble, S.M. and Noble, C.H. (2010) The influence of C2C communications in online brand communities on customer purchase behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38(5): 634–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, P. (2004) The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 31(1): 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U.M. and Herrmann, A. (2005) The social influence of brand community: evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing 69(3): 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R.P. and Heatherton, T.F. (1994) A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1(1): 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, G. and van Riel, C. (2004) Corporate associations in the academic literature: Three main streams of thought in the reputation measurement literature. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(2), 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, G., van Riel, C.B.M. and van Bruggen, G.H. (2005) Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses: The Moderating Role of Corporate Brand Dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69(3): 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S. (2003) Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing 67(2): 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, P.H. and Richins, M.L. (1983) A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research 47(3): 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, P.H., Sherrell, D.L. and Ridgway, N.M. (1986) Consumer search: An extended framework. Journal of Consumer Research 13(1): 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. (2011) Customer engagement: Opportunities and challenges for organizations. Journal of Service Research 14(3): 272–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R.J., Ilic, A., Juric, B. and Hollebeek, L. (2013) Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research 66(1): 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R.J., Hollebeek, L.D., Juric B. and Ilic, A. (2011) Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research 14(3): 252–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buil, I., Martínez, E. and de Chernatony, L. (2013) The influence of brand equity on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Marketing 30(1): 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celsi, R. and Olson, J.C. (1988) The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research 15(2): 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulides, G., Cadogan, J.W. and Veloutsou, C. (2015) Consumer-based brand equity measurement: Lessons learned from an international study. International Marketing Review 32(3/4): 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb-Walgren, C.J., Beal, C. and Donthu, N. (1995) Brand equity brand preferences, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising 24(3): 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Matos, C.A. and Rossi, C.A.V. (2008) Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36(4): 578–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Australia (2015). Mobile Consumer Survey: The Australian Cut. Available from: http://landing.deloitte.com.au/rs/761-IBL-328/images/deloitte-au-tmt-mobile-consumer-survey-2015-291015.pdf?mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRokvaTIe%2B%2FhmjTEU5z16e8sXqSwhIkz2EFye%2BLIHETpodcMT8RqNr%2FYDBceEJhqyQJxPr3CKtEN09dxRhLgAA%3D%3D

  • Dessart, L., Veloutsou, C. and Morgan-Thomas, A. (2015) Consumer engagement in online brand communities: A social media perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management 24(1): 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, U.M. (1998) Involvement-response models of joint effects: An empirical test and extension. Advances in Consumer Research 25(1): 499–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E. (2014) The Johnnie Walker brand: A rich blend of design and progress. Mashable Australia, 3 May, http://mashable.com/2014/05/02/johnnie-walker-marketing-strategy/#mePpWLZqSEqY, accessed 7 January 2016

  • Feldman, J.M. and Lynch, J.G. (1988) Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 73(3): 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C. and Larcker D.F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998) Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 24(4): 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, P. and Hancock, G.R. (2006) Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 41(1): 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2014) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2011) PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19(2): 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G.R. and Mueller, R.O. (2001) Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In: R. Cudeck, S. du Toit and D. Sörbom (eds.) Structural Equation Modeling: Present and FutureA Festschrift in Honor of Karl Jöreskog. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc., pp. 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeffler, S. and Keller, K.L. (2003) The marketing advantages of strong brands. Journal of Brand Management 19(6): 421–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L.D. (2011) Demystifying customer engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus. Journal of Marketing Management 27(7-8): 785–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L.D., Glynn, M.S. and Brodie, R.J. (2014) Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing 28(2): 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe E.D. and Pasternak H. (1997) A note on the response effects of laboratory- versus respondent-located computer-administered questioning. Industrial Marketing Management 26(3): 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, K. and Srinivasan, N. (1990) An empirical assessment of multiple operationalizations of involvement. Advances in Consumer Research 17(1): 594–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. and Aaker, D.A. (1992) The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research 29(1): 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. and Aaker, D.A. (1998) The impact of corporate marketing on a company’s brand extensions. Corporate Reputation Review 1(4): 356–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 57(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. (2013) Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring and Managing Brand Equity. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, R.A., Jain, A. and Howard, D.J. (1992) Store shopping experience and consumer price-quality-value perceptions. Journal of Retailing 68(4): 376–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R.V. (2014) Social brand engagement: A new idea. GfK Marketing Intelligence Review 6(2): 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Aksoy, L., Donkers, B., Venkatesan, R., Wiesel, T. and Tillmanns, S. (2010) Undervalued or overvalued customers: Capturing total customer engagement value. Journal of Service Research 13(3): 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leckie, C., Nyadzayo, M.W. and Johnson, L. (2016) Antecedents of consumer brand engagement and brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing Management 32(5-6): 558–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M.K. and Whitney, D.J. (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(1): 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J.C. (2004) Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Equation Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marketing Science Institute (2010) 2010–2012 Research priorities: A guide to MSI research programs and procedures, Cambridge, MA, http://image.sciencenet.cn/olddata/kexue.com.cn/upload/blog/file/2010/9/201091515178616316.pdf, accessed 15 April 2016.

  • Miquel, S., Caplliure, E.M. and Aldas-Manzano, J. (2002) The effect of personal involvement on the decision to buy store brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management 11(6): 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, B. and Lee, M-S. (1989) A causal model of consumer involvement. Journal of Economic Psychology 10(3): 363–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesladek, M. (2015) Newton Running makes strides in consumer engagement. Direct Marketing News, 12 June, http://www.dmnews.com/marketing-strategy/newton-running-makes-strides-in-consumer-engagement/article/420111/, accessed 18 April 2016.

  • Netemeyer, R.G., Krishnan, B., Pullig, C., Wang, G., Yagci, M., Dean, D., Ricks, J. and Wirth, F. (2004). Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity. Journal of Business Research 57(2): 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, A.L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D.E., Patrício, L., Voss, C.A., and Lemon, K. (2015). Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. Journal of Service Research, 18(2): 127–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappu, R. and Quester, P. (2006) Does customer satisfaction lead to improved brand equity? An empirical examination of two categories of retail brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management 15(1): 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, H.W. (2015) Heritage brands must not get stuck in the past, says Premier Foods marketing director. Marektingmagazine.co.uk, 30 April, http://www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/article/1345285/heritage-brands-not-stuck-past-says-premier-foods-marketing-director, accessed 7 January 2016.

  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie S.M., Lee, J-Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003) Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M.L. and Bloch, P.H. (1986) After the new wears off: The temporal context of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Research 13(2): 280–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Will, A. (2005) SmartPLS 2.0. (Beta). Hamburg, Germany: University of Hamburg.

  • Saville, P. (2015). What does 2016 hold for brand experiences? 5 trends for the coming year. Marektingmagazine.co.uk, 22 December, www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/article/1377697/does-2016-hold-brand-experiences-5-trends-coming-year, accessed 7 January 2016.

  • Schau, H. J., Muñiz Jr., A.M. and Arnould, E.J. (2009) How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing 73(5): 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang, R-A., Chen Y-C. and Liao, H-J. (2006) The value of participation in virtual consumer communities on brand loyalty. Internet Research 16(4): 398–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J.N. and Parvatiyar, A. (1995) Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23(4): 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichtmann, C. and Diamantopoulos, A. (2013) The impact of perceived brand globalness, brand origin image, and brand origin-extension fit on brand extension success. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 41(5): 567–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spry, A., Pappu, R. and Cornwell, B.T. (2011) Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity. European Journal of Marketing 45(6): 882–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokburger-Sauer, N. (2010) Brand community: Drivers and outcomes. Psychology & Marketing 27(4): 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storbacka, K., Brodie, R.J., Böhmann, T., Maglio, P.P., and Nenonen, S. (2016). Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation. Journal of Business Research. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.A., and Sinha, R.K. (2008) Brand communities and new product adoption: The influence and limits of oppositional loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 72(6): 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M., MacInnis, D.J. and Park, C.W. (2005) The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 15(1): 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripodi, J. (2011) Coca-Cola marketing shifts from impressions to expressions. Harvard Business Review, 27 April, https://hbr.org/2011/04/coca-colas-marketing-shift-fro/, accessed 18 April 2016.

  • van Doorn, J., Lemon, K.N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P. and Verhoef, P.C. (2010) Customer engagement behaviour: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research 13(3): 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varki, S. and Wong, S. (2003) Consumer involvement in relationship marketing of services. Journal of Services Research 6(1): 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivek, S.D., Beatty, S.E., Morgan, R.M. (2012) Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 20(2): 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WARC (2013) Heineken’s legendary journey: Justifying a premium the world over. Accessed 21 April 2016 from World Advertising Research Centre (WARC) Database.

  • Warrington, P. and Shim, S. (2000) An empirical investigation of the relationship between product involvement and brand commitment. Psychology and Marketing, 17(9): 761–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woohlfeil, M. and Wheelan, S. (2006) Customer motivations to participate in event-marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing Management 22(5-6): 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B. and Donthu, N. (2001) Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research 52(1): 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B., Donthu, N. and Lee, S. (2000) An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(2): 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985) Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research 12(3): 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of the evidence. Journal of Marketing 52(3): 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Dwivedi.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41262-016-0020-6.

Appendix A: Actual Brand Engagement (Keller, 2013)

Appendix A: Actual Brand Engagement (Keller, 2013)

Collecting brand information

  1. 1.

    I like learning about my brand of tablet.

  2. 2.

    If this brand has any new products or services, I tend to notice it.

  3. 3.

    If I see a newspaper or magazine article about my brand of tablet I tend to read it.

  4. 4.

    If I see a news story online about my brand, I tend to open and read it.

  5. 5.

    I like to visit my brand’s website.

  6. 6.

    I like to read online blogs about my brand of tablet.

Participating in brand marketing activities

  1. 1.

    If I notice an ad for my brand of tablet, I tend to pay attention to it.

  2. 2.

    If I notice a sales promotion from my brand, I tend to pay attention to it.

  3. 3.

    If I get something in the mail from my brand, I tend to open it.

  4. 4.

    If my brand sponsors a sports, entertainment or arts event, I tend to notice it.

  5. 5.

    If I see a billboard or any outdoor type of ad for my brand, I tend to notice it.

  6. 6.

    If my brand of tablet has a display or demonstration in the store, I tend to notice it.

  7. 7.

    If my brand of tablet shows up in a movie or a television show, I tend to notice it.

  8. 8.

    If I get to sample one of my brand’s new products, I tend to try it.

  9. 9.

    I like to buy licensed products from my brand.

Interacting with other people

  1. 1.

    I like to talk to other people about my brand of tablet.

  2. 2.

    I like to talk to people at work about my brand of tablet.

  3. 3.

    I like to talk to my friends and family about my brand of tablet.

  4. 4.

    I like to seek out others who use my brand of tablet.

  5. 5.

    I have joined or would like to join an online community with other users of my brand of tablet.

  6. 6.

    I have joined or would like to join an online community with others who like my brand.

  7. 7.

    I have joined or would like to join an online community with people from the company who makes my brand.

  8. 8.

    I am active in a loyalty program for my brand of tablet.

  9. 9.

    I tend to notice when others are using my brand.

Source: Keller (2013, p. 349).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dwivedi, A., Wilkie, D., Johnson, L. et al. Establishing measures and drivers of consumer brand engagement behaviours. J Brand Manag 23, 41–69 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-016-0001-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-016-0001-9

Keywords

Navigation