Skip to main content
Log in

Coopetition in the French luxury industry: five cases of brand-building by suppliers of luxury brands

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth and globalization of the luxury market has led to a profound rethinking of business models. In traditional luxury markets such as France, it has become harder for suppliers to have full discretion of their strategies alongside large conglomerates. To deal with this challenge, some suppliers have decided to move to coopetition, that is, to develop their own brand (competition) and continue to work as a supplier for other luxury brands (cooperation). The objective of this paper is twofold. First, a preliminary analysis aims to present a panorama of various coopetitive situations in the luxury industry and identify five triggers: the first three involve situations where cooperation is added to a competitive situation (horizontal cooperation, internal cooperation, and cooperation through a third-party actor); the second two occur when competition is added to a cooperative situation (through upstream or downstream integration). The second part of the paper focuses on this latter type of coopetition, that is, when suppliers decide to move down the value chain. Five cases on the French market are compared, based on the separation, mediation, and integration strategies used to design relevant value architectures and propositions. These strategies respond to two main challenges raised by the move to coopetition: suppliers need to master the necessary capabilities to promote their own brand (capabilities challenge), and they need to make sure that this new activity does not threaten their existing business as a supplier (balance challenge). Coopetitive business models need to be carefully designed in order for value to be created and appropriated at different levels of the ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amit, C., and R. Zott. 2010. Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning 43 (2–3): 216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., and S. Kock. 2000. “Coopetition” in business networks—To cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management 29 (5): 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., and S. Kock. 2014. Coopetition-Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management 43 (2): 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., and T. Raza-Ullah. 2016. A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketing Management 57 (August): 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackett, T., and B. Boad. 1999. Co-branding—The science of alliance. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan Business Interbrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A.M., and B.J. Nalebuff. 1996. Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiambaretto, P., and H. Dumez. 2016. Toward a typology of coopetition: A multilevel approach. International Studies of Management and Organization 46 (2–3): 110–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colucci, M., E. Montaguti, and U. Lago. 2008. Managing brand extension via licensing: An investigation into the high-end fashion industry. International Journal of Research in Marketing 25 (2): 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depeyre, C., E. Rigaud, and F. Seraidarian. 2017. Quelles stratégies pour les sous-traitants face aux reconfigurations des chaînes de valeur ? Le cas de la joaillerie en France. Gérer & Comprendre 127: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, M., W. Roering, B. Carlin, and J. Wisnieski. 1996. Multifaceted relationships under coopetition description and theory. Journal of Management Inquiry 5 (2): 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, A.S., F. Le Roy, and D.R. Gnyawali. 2014. Sources and management of tension in co-opetition case evidence from telecommunications satellites manufacturing in Europe. Industrial Marketing Management 43 (2): 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D.R., R. Madhavan, H. Jinyu, and M. Bengtsson. 2016. The competition–cooperation paradox in inter-firm relationships: “A conceptual framework”. Industrial Marketing Management 53 (2): 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacolin, S. 2016. A côté de la place Vendôme, entre façon et creation. Aude Mathon. Le Journal de l’Ecole de Paris 118: 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J.N. 2012. Why luxury should not delocalize. A critique of a growing tendency. The European Business Review March-April: 58–62.

  • Kapferer, J.N., and V. Bastien. 2012. The luxury strategy: Break the rules of marketing to build luxury brands. London: Kogan-Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J.N., and V. Bastien. 2009. The specificity of luxury management: Turning marketing upside down. Journal of Brand Management 16 (5/6): 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. 2009. Managing the growth tradeoff: Challenges and opportunities in luxury branding. Journal of Brand Management 16 (5–6): 290–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, G. 1996. Management stratégique: Paradoxes, interactions et apprentissages. Paris: Nathan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okonkwo, U. 2009. Guest Editorial. The luxury brand strategy challenge. Journal of Brand Management 16 (5–6): 287–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, A.L. 2004. On the duality of competition and collaboration: Network-based knowledge relations in the biotechnology industry. Scandinavian Journal of Management 20 (1): 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., and Y. Pigneur. 2011. Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza-Ullah, T., M. Bengtsson, and S. Kock. 2014. The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management 43 (2): 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritala, P., A. Golnam, and A. Wegmann. 2014. Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon.com. Industrial Marketing Management 43 (2): 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Som, A., and C. Blanckaert. 2015. The road to luxury: The evolution, markets and strategies of luxury brand management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning 43 (2–3): 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yami, S., S. Castaldo, G.B. Dagnino, and F. Le Roy. 2010. Coopetition. Winning strategies for the 21st Century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colette Depeyre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Depeyre, C., Rigaud, E. & Seraidarian, F. Coopetition in the French luxury industry: five cases of brand-building by suppliers of luxury brands. J Brand Manag 25, 463–473 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0088-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0088-2

Keywords

Navigation