Skip to main content
Log in

Wait-and-see strategy: Risk management in the internationalization process model

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We interpret the wait-and-see strategy as a decision to maintain unchanged the firm’s commitments to its business network relationships. To explain why firms choose a wait-and-see strategy, we propose an extension to the relationship commitment decisions aspect of the Uppsala internationalization process (IP) Model. With this development, we explain that the wait-and-see strategy can result from a change in the levels of risk assumed in the firm and not only from the decision to adjust the risk that the firm encounters by changing commitments to its network relationships. This development enhances the ability of the IP model to accommodate contextual influences on relationship commitment decisions and to explain a more complete suite of internationalization trajectories. Extending the theoretical core of the IP model further confirms its efficacy, its application to international strategy, and its potential to be developed as a general process model of strategic change.

Résumé

Nous interprétons la stratégie wait-and-see comme la décision de maintenir inchangés les engagements de la firme vis-à-vis de ses relations d’affaires. Pour expliquer pourquoi les firmes choisissent une stratégie wait-and-see, nous proposons une extension aux décisions d’engagement dans les relations du modèle d’Uppsala sur le processus d’internationalisation (PI). Avec ce développement, nous expliquons que la stratégie wait-and-see peut résulter d’un changement dans les niveaux de risque assumés par la firme et pas seulement de la décision d’ajuster le risque que la firme rencontre en modifiant les engagements vis-à-vis de ses relations d’affaires. Ce développement améliore la capacité du modèle PI à adapter les influences contextuelles sur les décisions d’engagement relationnel et à expliquer un ensemble plus complet de trajectoires d’internationalisation. Elargir le fond théorique du modèle PI confirme son efficacité, son application à la stratégie d’internationalisation et son potentiel de pouvoir être développé comme un modèle général du processus de changement stratégique.

Resumen

Interpretamos la estrategia de esperar y ver como una decisión para mantener intactos los compromisos de la empresa con las relaciones en su red de negocios. Para explicar por qué las empresas escogen una estrategia de esperar y ver, proponemos una extensión al aspecto de las decisiones sobre el compromiso con las relaciones del modelo Uppsala del proceso de internacionalización (IP). Con este desarrollo, explicamos que la estrategia de esperar y ver puede resultar de un cambio en los niveles de riesgo asumidos en la empresa y no sólo de la decisión de ajustar el riesgo que la empresa encuentra cuando cambia los compromisos con su red de negocios. Este desarrollo mejora la habilidad del modelo del proceso de internacionalización a acomodar influencias contextuales en las decisiones sobre la relación de compromiso y para explicar un conjunto más completo de las trayectorias de internacionalización. La extensión del núcleo del modelo del proceso de internacionalización re-confirma su eficacia, su aplicación a la estrategia internacional, y su potencial para ser desarrollado como un modelo de proceso general de cambio estratégico.

Resumo

Interpretamos a estratégia de aguardar-e-ver como uma decisão de manter inalterados os compromissos da empresa com os relacionamentos de sua rede comercial. Para explicar por que as empresas escolhem uma estratégia aguardar-e-ver, propomos uma extensão ao aspecto das decisões de compromisso de relacionamento do modelo de processo de internacionalização de Uppsala (IP). Com este desenvolvimento, explicamos que a estratégia de aguardar-e-ver pode resultar de uma mudança nos níveis de risco assumidos na empresa e não apenas da decisão de ajustar o risco que a empresa encontra ao mudar compromissos com seus relacionamentos de rede. Esse desenvolvimento melhora a capacidade do modelo IP para acomodar influências contextuais nas decisões de compromisso de relacionamento e para explicar um conjunto mais completo de trajetórias de internacionalização. A extensão do núcleo teórico do modelo IP confirma ainda mais sua eficácia, sua aplicação à estratégia internacional e seu potencial para ser desenvolvido como um modelo de processo geral de mudança estratégica.

摘要

我们将观望策略解读为维持公司对其业务网络关系承诺不变的决策。为了解释为什么企业选择观望策略, 我们提出了对乌普萨拉国际化过程 (IP) 模型关系承诺决策方面的延伸。通过这一拓展, 我们解释了观望策略可能是企业承担的风险水平发生变化的结果,而不仅仅是调整企业由于改变其对网络关系的承诺而遭遇风险所做决定的结果。这一拓展增强了IP模型适应情境对关系承诺决策影响的能力, 并解释了更为完整的国际化轨迹组合。对IP模型理论核心的延伸进一步确认了其功效、对国际策略的应用、以及作为策略变化通用过程模型可开发的潜力。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. 2011. Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 247–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, T. C., Andersson, U., & Birkinshaw, J. 2010. What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 1099–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Models of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, O. 1993. On the internationalization process of firms: A critical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2): 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. J. 2008. The performance relationship of effective risk management: Exploring the firm-specific investment rationale. Long Range Planning, 41(2): 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito, G. R. G. 2005. Divestment and international business strategy. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(2): 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito, G. R. G., & Welch, L. S. 1997. De-internationalization. Management International Review, 37(2): 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. 2015. Enterprise risk management: Review, critique and research directions. Long Range Planning, 48(4): 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., & Brannen, M. Y. 2011. Positioning JIBS as an interdisciplinary journal. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. 2009. Affordable loss: Behavioral economic aspects of the plunge decision. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2): 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, H. K., & Slocum, J. W. 1975. Uncertainty: Measures, research, and sources of variation. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3): 562–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. 2015. The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1): 575–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira-de-Lemos, F., & Hadjikhani, A. 2014. Internationalization processes in stable and unstable market conditions: Towards a model of commitment decisions in dynamic environments. Journal of World Business, 49(3): 332–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira-de-Lemos, F., Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2011. Risk management in the internationalization process of the firm: A note on the Uppsala model. Journal of World Business, 46(2): 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M. 2002. The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: A critical review. International Business Review, 11(3): 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M. 2016. A note on the revisited Uppsala internationalization process model: The implications of business networks and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(9): 1135–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johanson, J. 2005. Managing the embedded multinational: A business network view. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., & Johanson, J. 2010. A dialogue about the Uppsala model of internationalization. In U. Andersson, & U. Holm (Eds.) Managing the contemporary multinational: 283–304. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furrer O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. 2008. The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G. 2012. Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23(1): 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. 1987. Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5): 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C.-Y. 2009. Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28: 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. 1982. A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Camerer, C. F. 2005. Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science, 310(5754): 1680–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isobe, T., Makino, S., & Montgomery, D. B. 2000. Resource commitment, entry timing, and market performance of foreign direct investments in emerging economies: The case of Japanese international joint ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 468–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2006. Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: A note on the Uppsala internationalization process model. Management International Review, 46(2): 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D., & Diltz, J. D. 2004. Day traders and the disposition effect. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5(4): 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, L., & Verbeke, A. 2015. The three faces of bounded reliability: Alfred Chandler and the micro-foundations of management theory. California Management Review, 58(1): 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. A., & Liesch, P. W. 2002. Information internalisation in internationalising the firm. Journal of Business Research, 55(12): 981–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. A., & Liesch, P. W. 2015. Internationalization: From incremental to born global. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Hult, G. T. M. 2016. Meyer and Peng’s 2005 article as a foundation for an expanded and refined international business research agenda: Context, organizations, and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. 2013. Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N., & Cosgel, M. M. 1993. Frank Knight on risk, uncertainty, and the firm: A new interpretation. Economic Inquiry, 31(3): 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liesch, P. W., Buckley, P. J., Simonin, B. L., & Knight, G. A. 2012. Organizing the modern firm in the worldwide market for market transactions. Management International Review, 52(1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liesch, P. W., Welch, L. S., & Buckley, P. J. 2011. Risk and uncertainty in internationalisation and international entrepreneurship studies. Management International Review, 51(6): 851–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. 2013. Organizing processes and the construction of risk: A discursive approach. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. 1987. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11): 1404–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 1133–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, L. 1992. Internationalization as a strategy process. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2): 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. 2015. Context in management research in emerging economies. Management and Organization Review, 11(3): 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. 2011. Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michailova, S. 2011. Contextualizing in international business research: Why do we need more of it and how can we be better at it? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1): 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. D. 1992. A framework for integrated risk management in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2): 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. D. 1993. Industry and country effects on managers’ perceptions of environmental uncertainties. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 693–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3): 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W., Shaver, J. M., & Yeung, B. 1993. Performance following changes of international presence in domestic and transition industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 647–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pablo, A. L., Sitkin, S., & Jemison, D. B. 1996. Acquisition decision-making processes: The central role of risk. Journal of Management, 22(5): 723–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, B., & Pedersen, T. 1997. Twenty years after: Support and critique of the Uppsala internationalization model. In I. Bjorkman, & M. Forsgren (Eds.), The nature of the international firm: 117–134. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. 1992. The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H., & De Meyer, A. 2002. On uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48(8): 1008–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J., & Leiblein, M. J. 2000. Downside risk implications of multinationality and international joint ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santangelo, G. D., & Meyer, K. E. 2011. Extending the internationalization process model: Increases and decreases of MNE commitment in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(7): 894–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H. J., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. 2006. A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 914–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. 2001. Causation and effectuation: Towards a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, R., Vahlne, J.-E., Johanson. J. 2010. Internationalization as an entrepreneurial process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8(4): 343–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinkle, G. A. 2012. Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: Building on the past and aiming for the future. Journal of Management, 38(1): 415–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. 1992. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1): 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. 1995. Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6): 1573–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, G., & Spencer, D. A. 2000. The uncertain foundations of transaction costs economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 34(1): 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sull, D. N. 2005. Strategy as active waiting. Harvard Business Review, 83(9): 120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D., Nerur, S. P., & Balijepally, V. 2011. Source or storer? IB’s performance in a knowledge network. Journal of International Business Studies,42(3): 446–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesco PLC. 2013. Tesco PLC annual report and financial statements 2013.

  • Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. 1990. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6): 643–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. 2002. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5): 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahlne, J.-E., & Ivarsson, I. 2014. The globalization of Swedish MNEs: Empirical evidence and theoretical explanations. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(3): 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahlne, J.-E., & Johanson, J. 2013. The Uppsala model on evolution of the multinational business enterprise – from internalization to coordination of networks. International Marketing Review, 30(3): 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. 1992. Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 510–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., & Greidanus, N. S. 2009. The end of the opportunism vs trust debate: Bounded reliability as a new envelope concept in research on MNE governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1471–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, C., Nummela, N., & Liesch, P. W. 2016. The internationalization process model revisited: An agenda for future research. Management International Review, 56(6): 783–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B., & Karnani, A. 1987. Competitive strategy under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 8(2): 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter W Liesch.

Additional information

Accepted by Ulf Andersson, Area Editor, 22 August 2017. This article has been with the authors for three revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clarke, J.E., Liesch, P.W. Wait-and-see strategy: Risk management in the internationalization process model. J Int Bus Stud 48, 923–940 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0110-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0110-z

Keywords

Navigation