Skip to main content
Log in

What is “Chinese” about Chinese multinationals?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buckley et al.’s (J Int Bus Studi 38(4):499–518, 2007) pioneering work concluded that the determinants of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) from China were similar to those observed in developed countries – but with a few modifications. In this commentary, we suggest continuing their effort to understand what is distinctive about Chinese multinational enterprises (CMNEs). We look for underlying explanations that are analytically useful and potentially generalizable, unlike a firm’s nationality, which is a catch-all variable with no analytical value. Based on prior research and Ramamurti (Glob Strategy J 2(1):41–47, 2012a), we argue that the following variables help explain distinctive aspects of CMNE internationalization: (1) their “stage of evolution as a multinational enterprise,” with most CMNEs being infant MNEs rather than mature MNEs; (2) the “global context for internationalization,” which has helped CMNEs internationalize faster than it was possible in earlier decades; (3) “government-created advantages,” which complemented China’s natural endowments and for the most part improved CMNEs’ international competitiveness; and (4) “leapfrogging advantage,” which allowed late-mover Chinese firms to gain a competitive advantage in smokestack industries and some sunrise industries. These variables may also explain the behavior of MNEs from other emerging economies and are therefore candidates for inclusion in general models of the internationalization process.

Résumé

Les travaux pionniers de Buckley, Clegg, Cross, Liu, Voss et Zheng (2007) ont conclu que les déterminants de l’investissement direct à l’étranger (IDE) de la Chine étaient similaires à ceux observés dans les pays développés, mais avec quelques modifications. Dans ce commentaire, nous suggérons de poursuivre leurs efforts pour comprendre ce qui est particulier à propos des entreprises multinationales chinoises (EMNC). Nous cherchons des explications sous-jacentes qui sont analytiquement utiles et potentiellement généralisables, contrairement à la nationalité d’une firme qui est une variable fourre-tout sans valeur analytique. Sur la base de recherches antérieures et de celles de Ramamurti (2012a), nous soutenons que les variables suivantes aident à expliquer les aspects particuliers de l’internationalisation des EMNC : (1) leur « stade d’évolution en tant qu’entreprise multinationale », la plupart des EMNC étant des multinationales (EMN) plutôt infantiles que matures ; (2) le « contexte mondial d’internationalisation » qui a aidé les EMNC à s’internationaliser plus rapidement que cela n’a été possible au cours des décennies précédentes ; (3) les « avantages créés par le gouvernement » qui ont complété les dotations naturelles de la Chine et qui, pour la plupart, ont amélioré la compétitivité internationale des EMNC ; et (4) des « avantages de dépassement » qui ont permis aux entreprises chinoises en retard de gagner un avantage compétitif dans les industries traditionnelles et dans certaines industries d’avenir. Ces variables peuvent également expliquer le comportement des EMN d’autres économies émergentes et méritent donc d’être incluses dans les modèles généraux du processus d’internationalisation.

Resumen

El trabajo pionero de Buckley, Clegg, Cross, Liu y Zhen (2007) concluyó que los determinantes de la inversión extranjera directa saliente de China eran similares a los que se observan en países desarrollados – pero con algunas modificaciones. En este comentario, sugerimos continuar su esfuerzo para entender qué es diferente en las empresas multinacionales chinas. Buscamos resaltar las explicaciones que sean analíticamente útiles y potencialmente generalizables, distintas a la nacionalidad de la empresa, la cual es una variable global sin un valor analítico. Con base en investigación previa y el trabajo de Ramamurti (2012a), argumentamos que las siguientes variables ayudan a explicar los aspectos distintivos de la internacionalización de las empresas multinacionales chinas: (1) su “etapa de evolución como una empresa multinacional”; la mayoría de las EMN chinas son inmaduras en lugar de maduras; (2) el “contexto global para la internacionalización”, la cual ha ayudado a las EMN chinas a internacionalizarse más rápido que las décadas anteriores; (3) “las ventajas creadas por el gobierno” las cuales complementan los atributos naturales y en su mayor parte mejoran la competitividad internacionales de las EMN chinas; y (4) las “ventajas de salto” las cuales permites a las empresas chinas de reciente desarrollo ganar una ventaja competitiva en industrias de chimenea y al algunas industrias de amanecer. Estas variables pueden explicar el comportamiento de las EMN de otras economías emergentes y por lo tanto son candidatas para inclusión en modelos generales del proceso de internacionalización.

Resumo

O trabalho pioneiro de Buckley, Clegg, Cross, Liu, Voss e Zheng (2007) concluiu que os determinantes do investimento externo direto externo (OFDI) da China eram semelhantes aos observados em países desenvolvidos – mas com algumas modificações. Neste comentário, sugerimos prosseguir seus esforços para entender o que é característico sobre empresas multinacionais chinesas (CMNEs). Buscamos explicações fundamentais que sejam analiticamente úteis e potencialmente generalizáveis, ao contrário da nacionalidade da empresa, que é uma variável global sem valor analítico. Com base em pesquisa pregressa de Ramamurti (2012a), argumentamos que as seguintes variáveis ajudam a explicar os aspectos característicos da internacionalização de CMNEs: (1) o seu “estágio de evolução como empresa multinacional”, sendo que a maioria das CMNEs são MNE jovens ao invés de MNEs maduras; (2) o “contexto global para a internacionalização”, que ajudou as CMNEs a se internacionalizarem mais rapidamente do que era possível em décadas anteriores; (3) “vantagens criadas pelo governo”, que complementaram as dotações naturais da China e, na sua maioria, melhoraram a competitividade internacional das CMNEs; e (4) “vantagem de salto”, o que permitiu às empresas chinesas tardias em se moverem obter uma vantagem competitiva em indústrias de tradicionais e em algumas novas indústrias. Essas variáveis também podem explicar o comportamento de MNEs de outras economias emergentes e, portanto, são candidatas à inclusão em modelos gerais do processo de internacionalização.

概要

Buckley, Clegg, Cross, Liu, Voss 和 Zheng (2007) 开拓性的研究得出的结论是, 中国对外直接投资 (OFDI) 的决定因素与在发达国家观察到的情形相似, 只略有修正。在这篇评论中, 我们建议继续他们认识中国跨国企业 (CMNEs) 有何独特性的努力。我们寻找根本的在分析上有用且具有潜在通用性的解释, 与公司的没有分析价值的包罗万象的国籍变量不同。 基于先前的研究和 Ramamurti (2012a), 我们认为以下变量有助于解释中国跨国企业国际化的独特方面: (1) 它们的“跨国企业进化阶段”,大多数的中国跨国企业是婴儿型跨国企业,而不是成熟型跨国企业; (2) “国际化的全球情境”帮助中国跨国企业比前几十年更快国际化; (3) “政府创造优势”补充了中国的自然禀赋,大部分改善了中国跨国企业的国际竞争力; (4) “蛙跳优势”让后发的中国公司在烟窗行业和一些朝阳行业中获得竞争优势。这些变量也可以解释来自其它新兴经济体的跨国企业的行为,因而是国际化进程通用模型可纳入的候选变量。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, R., & Agmon, T. 1990. The international success of developing country firms: Role of government-directed comparative advantage. Management International Review, 30(2): 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H. 2001. The rise of “the rest”: Challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Apple. 2017. Form 10-K. http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/AAPL/5101260271x0x913905/66363059-7FB6-4710-B4A5-7ABFA14CF5E6/10-K_2016_9.24.2016_-_as_filed.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2017.

  • Athreye, S., & Kapur, S. 2009. Introduction: The internationalization of Chinese and Indian firms – trends, motivations, and strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2): 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., Baum, J. A. C., & Mannix, E. A. 2002. Management challenges in a new time. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 916–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg. 2017. China’s $246 billion foreign buying spree is unraveling. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-10/china-s-246-billion-takeover-spree-is-crumbling-as-sellers-balk. Accessed 31 August 2017.

  • Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Cross, A. R., Tan, H., Xin, L., & Voss, H. 2008. Historic and emergent trends in Chinese outward direct investment. Management International Review, 48(6): 715–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, K. G. 1999. Outward foreign direct investment: A novel dimension of China’s integration into the regional and global economy. The China Quarterly, 160: 856–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, L., & Miroux, A. 2016. The emerging multinationals report, 2016: The China surge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Emerging Markets Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. 2016. The 13th five-year plan for economic and social development of the People`s Republic of China 2016–2020. Translated by the Compilation and Translation Bureau, Beijing, China. http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201612/P020161207645765233498.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2017.

  • Chen, Y. Y., & Young, M. N. 2010. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal–principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3): 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y. W., & Qian, X. W. 2008. The empirics of China’s outward direct investment. Munich: CESifo GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Inkpen, A., Musacchio, A., & Ramaswamy, K. 2014. Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8): 919–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Ramamurti, R, 2014. Understanding multinationals from emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cui L., & Jiang F. 2010. Behind ownership decision of Chinese outward FDI: Resources and institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4): 751–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., & Jiang, F. 2012. State ownership effect on firms’ FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: A study of Chinese outward-investing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3): 264–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. W. 2014. What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 488–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. 2007. Investing for strategic resources and its rationale: The case of outward FDI from Chinese companies. Business Horizons, 50(1): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. 2009. Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? Journal of World Business, 44(1): 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P., & Yang, M. 2015. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by emerging market firms: A comparative investigation. International Business Review, 24(1): 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duanmu, J. L. 2012. Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs). Journal of World Business, 47(1): 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist. 2017. Schumpeter: Ants in your pants. August 19: 57.

  • Fortune. 2017. Fortune’s 2017 global 500 list. http://fortune.com/global500. Accessed 31 August 2017.

  • Gammeltoft, P., Pradhan, J. P., & Goldstein, A. 2010. Emerging multinationals: Home and host country determinants and outcomes. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 5(3/4): 254–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R., 2011. Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3/4):191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, M. F., & García-Canal, E. 2009. The American model of the multinational firm and the “new” multinationals from emerging economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, T., & Huotari, M. 2016. A new record year for Chinese outbound investment in Europe. https://www.stiftung-mercator.de/media/downloads/3_Publikationen/MERICS_A_New_Record_Year_for_Chinese_Outbound_Investment_in_Europe_20160216.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2017.

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Y., & Jiang, F. 2012. FDI location choice of Chinese multinationals in East and Southeast Asia: Traditional economic factors and institutional perspective. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., & Lee, S.-H. 2015. Why strategic factor markets matter: “New” multinationals’ geographic diversification and firm profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4): 518–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. 2012. What determines Chinese outward FDI? Journal of World Business, 47(1): 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenovo. 2017. Lenovo announces fourth quarter and full year 2016/17 results. http://news.lenovo.com/news-releases/lenovo-announces-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-201617-results.htm. Accessed 31 August 2017.

  • Li, J., Newenham-Kahindi, A., Shapiro, D. M., & Chen, V. Z. 2013. The two-tier bargaining model revisited: Theory and evidence from China’s natural resource investments in Africa. Global Strategy Journal, 3(4): 300–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Q., Xu, P., & Jiraporn, P. 2013. Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8): 2953–2968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loungani, P., Mody, A., & Razin, A. 2002. The global disconnect: The role of transactional distance and scale economies in gravity equations. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49(5): 526–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Xue, Q., & Han, B. 2010. How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45(1): 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M., Li, D., & Yan, H. 2014. Chinese outward foreign direct investment performance: The role of learning. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 411–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. 2012. Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1): 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. 2002. Dragon multinational: A new model for global growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A., 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Ding, Y., Li, J., & Zhang, H. 2014. Overcoming distrust: How state-owned enterprises adapt their foreign entries to institutional pressures abroad. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8): 1005–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 600–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mofcom. 2017a. China FTA Network. http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/english/index.shtml. Accessed 1 September 2017.

  • Mofcom. 2017b. Mofcom Department Official of Outward Investment and Economic Cooperation Comments on China’s Outward Investment and Cooperation in 2016. http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/newsrelease/policyreleasing/201701/20170102503092.shtml. Accessed 31 August 2017.

  • Nayyar D. 2008. The internationalization of firms from India: Investment, mergers, and acquisitions. Oxford Development Studies, 36(1): 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. 2001. China and the global economy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P., & Zhang, J. 2002. The challenge of globalization for large Chinese firms. World Development, 30(12): 2089–2107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2012. The global strategy of emerging multinationals from China. Global Strategy Journal, 2(2): 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quer, D., Claver, E., & Rienda, L. 2012. Political risk, cultural distance, and outward foreign direct investment: Empirical evidence from large Chinese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4): 1089–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. 2004. Developing countries and MNEs: Extending and enriching the research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4): 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. 2009. What have we learned about emerging-market MNEs? In R. Ramamurti, & J. V. Singh (Eds), Emerging multinationals in emerging markets: 399–426. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. 2012a. What is really different about emerging market multinationals? Global Strategy Journal, 2(1): 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. 2012b. Competing with emerging market multinationals. Business Horizons, 55(3): 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R., & Singh, J. V. 2009. Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M., & Laforet, S. 2012. China’s outward foreign direct investment: Location choice and firm ownership. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. 2009. Theoretical aspects of MNEs from emerging economies. In R. Ramamurti, & J. V. Singh (Eds), Emerging multinationals in emerging markets: 42–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Li, J. 2007. Will China’s multinationals succeed globally or regionally? European Management Journal, 25(5): 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rui, H., & Yip, G. S. 2008. Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective. Journal of World Business, 43(2): 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirkin, H. L., Hemerling, J. W., & Bhattacharya, A. K. 2008. Globality: Competing with everyone from everywhere for everything. New York: Business Plus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statista. 2017a. Digital Economy Compass. April 2017. https://www.statista.com/page/compass. Accessed 31 August 2017.

  • Statista. 2017b. Huawei – statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/2305/huawei/. Accessed 28 August 2017.

  • Steinfeld, E. S. 1998. Forging reform in China: The fate of state-owned industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2006. World Investment Report 2006: FDI from developing countries and transition economies: Implications for development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2008. World Investment Report 2008: Transnational corporations and the infrastructure challenge. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2017a. World Investment Report 2017: Investments and the digital economy. New York: United Nations.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2017b. Statistics. http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96740. Accessed 31 August 2017.

  • Vernon, R., 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2): 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R., 1979a. The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41(4): 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. 1979b. The international aspects of state-owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 10(3): 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. 2015. The new internalization theory and multinational enterprises from emerging economies: A business history perspective. Business History Review, 89(3): 415–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Boateng, A. 2007. Cross-border M&As by Chinese firms: An analysis of strategic motivation and performance. International Management Review, 3(4): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. L., Luo, Y., Lu, X., Sun, J., & Maksimov, V. 2014. Autonomy delegation to foreign subsidiaries: An enabling mechanism for emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2): 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P. J., & Yin, E. 2013. Innovation by Chinese EMNEs. In P. J. Williamson, R. Ramamurti, A. Fleury, & M. T. Leme Fleury (Eds), The competitive advantage of emerging market multinationals: 64–80. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Williamson, P. J., & Zeng, M. 2009. Chinese multinationals: Emerging through new global gateways. In R. Ramamurti, & J.V. Singh (Eds), Emerging multinationals in emerging markets: 81–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Q. 2017. Firm age, marketization, and entry mode choices of emerging economy firms: Evidence from listed firms in China. Journal of World Business, 52(3): 372–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, G. S., & McKern, B. 2016. China’s next strategic advantage: From imitation to innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutshi, R. K., & Gibbons, P. T. 1998. The internationalization process of Singapore government-linked companies: A contextual view. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15(2): 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Alain Verbeke for his guidance on this commentary, Peter Buckley and his co-authors of the JIBS Decade Award-winning paper for their retrospective comments at the AIB meeting in Dubai, Jeremy Clegg and Hinrich Voss for specific clarifications regarding Buckley et al., and Klaus Meyer, Rajneesh Narula, and Sam Park for helpful suggestions. Ravi Ramamurti would like to acknowledge the support of the Center for Emerging Markets at the D’Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Ramamurti.

Additional information

Accepted by Alain Verbeke, Editor-in-Chief, 14 October 2017. This article has been with the authors for one revision and was single-blind reviewed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramamurti, R., Hillemann, J. What is “Chinese” about Chinese multinationals?. J Int Bus Stud 49, 34–48 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0128-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0128-2

Keywords

Navigation