Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing IR plots: dismal tragedies, exuberant romances, hopeful comedies and cynical satires

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a world where convincing explanations take narrative form, IR theories, too, resort to the basic plot alternatives of tragedy, romance, comedy and irony/satire. While the tendency to view the human condition as tragic pertains especially to the so-called realist school, romantic IR storytellers dwell, for example, among liberals, Marxists and peace researchers. This paper focuses on the lesser analysed plots of comedy and irony/satire, finding comic traces in normative, constructivist and critical IR research, and the ironic/satiric mood in poststructural studies. Using the criteria of nonviolence, flexibility, self-reflection and innovativeness, the paper evaluates the relative merits and downsides of the different plots, and takes a stand in favour of comic IR theories. The paper argues that comic theories are best equipped to come up with novel solutions to grave world political problems. Mildly hopeful comedies steer clear of tragic despair, exuberant romantic optimism and satiric cynicism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alker, H.R. 1996. Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1996. Poetics, trans. by Heath, M. London: Penguin Books.

  • Ashley, R.K. 1989. Living on Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism, and War. In International/Intertextual Relations, ed. J. Der Derian, and M.J. Shapiro, 259–321. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. 1968 [1965]. Rabelais and His World. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.

  • Booth, K., and N.J. Wheeler. 2008. The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. 1969a [1945]. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  • Burke, K. 1969b [1950]. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  • Brown, C. 2007. Tragedy, ‘Tragic Choices’ and Contemporary International Political Theory. International Relations 21(1): 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. 1998. National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium 10(2): 126–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. 1983 [1980]. The Name of the Rose (trans: William Weaver). San Diego and New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.

  • Frost, M. 2003. Tragedy, Ethics and International Relations. International Relations 17(4): 477–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, N. .1973[1957]. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 162–539.

  • Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York and Toronto: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. 1960. All Men are Brothers: Life and Thoughts of Mahatma Gandhi as Told in His Own Words, compiled and edited by K. Kripalani. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, I. 2014. The Satiric Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Disorders. European Journal of International Relations 20(1): 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivie, R.L. 2003. Evil Enemy Versus Agonistic Other: Rhetorical Constructions of Terrorism. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 25(3): 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen, T.L. 2002. Twentieth-Century Stories. Journal of Peace Research 39(1): 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, J. 2010. The Tragedy of Offensive Realism: Classical Realism and the Rise of China. European Journal of International Relations 18(1): 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuusisto, R. 2009. Comic Plots as Conflict Resolution Strategy. European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 601–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N. 2005. Tragedy, Politics and Political Science. International Relations 19(3): 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. 2009. Grand Narratives and International Relations. Global Change, Peace & Security 21(1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. 2010. Global Civilizing Processes and the Ambiguities of Human Interconnectedness. European Journal of International Relations 16(2): 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The Post-modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, J. 2003. Tragedy, Progress and the International Order: A Response to Frost. International Relations 17(4): 497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, J., and D. Sylvan. 1996. Soft Bodies, Hard Targets, and Chic Theories. Millennium 25(2): 321–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. A. 2013. Reading the Global War on Terror as Comedy. Paper Delivered at the ISSS/ISAC Annual Conference; 4–6 August, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Payne, R. A. 2014. Using Zombie Comedies to Teach Critical IR Theory. Paper Delivered at the ISA Annual Meeting; 26–29 March, Toronto, Canada.

  • Rengger, N. 2005. Tragedy or Scepticism? Defending the Anti-Pelagian Mind in World Politics. International Relations 19(3): 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, E. 2006. Inter-Textual Relations: The Quarrel Over the Iraq War as a Conflict Between Narrative Types. Cooperation and Conflict 41(4): 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, P. 2000. Former Yugoslavia: The Security Dilemma That Never Was? European Journal of International Relations 6(3): 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B., and J. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating Peace. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilliam, R. 2007. Morgenthau in Context: German Backwardness, German Intellectuals and the Rise and Fall of a Liberal Project. European Journal of International Relations 13(3): 299–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suganami, H. 1996. On the Causes of War. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suganami, H. 2008. Narrative Explanation and International Relations: Back to Basics. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 37 (2): 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, J.A. 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, J.A. 1997. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 611–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. 2014. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction, 4th ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46(2): 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. 1995. Constructing International Politics. International Security 20(1): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. 2003. Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations 9(4): 491–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. 1987. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 54, 00014, Helsinki, Finland

    Riikka Kuusisto

Authors
  1. Riikka Kuusisto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riikka Kuusisto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuusisto, R. Comparing IR plots: dismal tragedies, exuberant romances, hopeful comedies and cynical satires. Int Polit 55, 160–176 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0076-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0076-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation