Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of nitrogen and phosphorus losses to surface water and groundwater through the implementation of the SWAT model for Norwegian soils

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scope and Background

It is acknowledged that diffuse sources cause the most important nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) losses to the river system and substantially enrich the groundwater in nitrates. These losses arise primary from agricultural activities mainly fertilizer applications, and they are determined by soil attributes. In cold climates, winter conditions and freezing of soils may influence the infiltration capacity of the soil and thereby can have a serious effect on the partitioning of excess precipitation and subsequently on the soil and nutrient transportation. The purpose of this article is to investigate the behaviour of six widespread and different textured soil types, on nutrient (N, P) losses under cold climate conditions. The investigation was conducted in the Norwegian Vansjø-Hobølv catchment through the application of a physical model named Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), taking into consideration the additional aspect of freezing soils during winter, which distinguishes Scandinavian from other European soils.

Methods

SWAT is a physical river basin model that was developed for the U.S.D.A. Agricultural Research Service, by the Blackland Research Center in Texas. In the current modeling approach the catchment was divided into 43 Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs) which consist of different combinations of the existed landcover and soil types. Nitrogen and phosphorus losses arising from these HRUs were estimated for the period 1990–2001 through the simultaneous simulation of water and sediment processes that are closely linked to the nutrient processes. The model took into account soil temperature in order to quantify water and nutrient transport to deeper layers, considering negligible downward movement when the soil temperature was under 0°C. It also simulated the aboveground development of the snowpack and the snowmelt processes on a daily basis. The six different soil types were distinguished in two groups according to their similarity in texture and other physical properties, one group of fine-textured soils and a group of coarse soils. The results were evaluated for different crop cultivations (barley, oats and wheat) of the aforementioned soils. Finally, the model was calibrated and validated by comparing predicted results with measured data.

Results and Discussion

Fine-textured soils caused significant runoff, sediment, total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) yields to the river system while coarser soils were characterized by high water drainage and nitrates leaching. The first soil group caused a mean of 517 mm of runoff in annual basis, 200 mm higher than this arising from coarse soils. Moreover, 3 tonnes of sediments per hectare, 24.6 kgN/ha and 0.54 kgP/ha were lost annually to surface water from fine soils while the average respective losses originating from coarse soils were only 1.3 tn of sediments/ha, 13.6kgN/ha and 0.17kgP/ha. The sensitivity ranking of the soil types to TN and TP losses was silty-clay-loam>silty-loam>clay>loamy>sandy-loam>sandy. An average of 277 mm of water was percolated annually under the bottom of the soil profile in coarse soils causing the additional leaching of 5.6 kgN-NO3/ha whereas the losses originating from fine-textured soils were 153 mm and 2.5 kg/ha respectively. According to their sensitivity in nitrates leaching, the six soil types were ranked in the following order: sandy>loamy>sandy-loam>silty-loam>silty-clay-loam>clay.

Conclusions and Perspectives

The results showed that even though under cold climate conditions, with monthly periods of average air-temperatures below zero, the overall amounts of annual TN and TP losses to surface waters as well as nitrates leaching to groundwater were considerable. This demonstrates that the cold climate conditions did not affect the long-term behavior of the six widespread Norwegian soils, which on an annual basis responded similarly to the respective European soils. According to the model’s estimations, infiltration with N and P transport still occur in wintertime, and comparing to other studies that reported similar results, different possible explanations were considered. The results demonstrate the need of considering the soil differentiation in Scandinavian countries similarly to the rest of Europe in order to apply mitigation measures against nitrogen and phosphorus losses to surface and groundwater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norra S (2002): 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Conference Report. J Soils Sediments 2(3) 108

    Google Scholar 

  2. Römbke J, Amorim M (2004): Tackling the heterogeneity of soils in ecotoxicological testing — An EURO-soil based approach. J Soils Sediments 4(4) 276–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Winckler C, Grafe A (2001): Characterization and utilization of wastes from intensive animal husbandry while taking different soils into consideration — Executive Summary, Research Report. J Soils Sediments 1(1) 58–62

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bielek P (2004) External impacts of soils as considered with the example of Slovakia. J Soils Sediments 4(2) 129–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeppesen E (1998): The ecology of shallow lakes — Trophic interactions in the pelagial. Doctor’s dissertation (DSc) National Environ Res Instit — NERI Technical Report No. 247, Silkeborg, Denmark, 420 pp

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kronvang B, Hoffmann CC, Svendsen LM, Windolf J, Jensen JP, Dørge J (1999): Retention of nutrients in river basins. Aquat Ecol 33, 29–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deelstra J, Kværnø SH, Granlund K, Sileika AS, Gaigalis K, Kyllmar K (2006): Runoff and nutrient losses during winter periods in cold climates-requirements to nutrient simulation models. HESS — Hydrol Environ Syst Scien (under review)

  8. Johnsson H, Lunding LC (1991): Surface runoff and soil water percolation as affected by snow and soil frost. J Hydr 122, 141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998): Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment part I: Model development. J Amer Water Res Assoc 34(1) 73–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bekiaris Y, Panagopoulos Y, Mimikou M (2005): Application of the SWAT Model in the Rhønnea catchment of Sweden. Proc. 9th Intern Conf on Environ Sci and Techn (9th CEST), Rhodes Island, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pikounis M, Varanou E, Baltas E, Dassaklis A, Mimikou M (2003): Application of the SWAT model in the Pinios river basin under different land use scenarios. Global Nest: The Intern J 5(2) 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  12. Varanou E, Gkouvatsou E, Baltas E, Mimikou M (2002): Quantity and quality integrated catchment modelling under climatic change with use of soil and water assessment tool model. J Hydr Eng, ASCE 7(3) 228–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neitsch JG, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2001): Soil and Water Assessment Tool, Theoretical Documentation, Version 2000

  14. Di Luzio M, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG (2001): ArcView Interface for SWAT 2000

  15. Neitsch JG, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2001): Soil and Water Assessment Tool. User’s Manual, Version 2000

  16. Deelstra J, Kværnø SH, Vandsemb SM, Bechmann M, Eggestad HO (2003): A description of the Skuterud catchment. Jordforsk Report

  17. Linström G, Bishop K, Löfvenius MO (2002): Soil frost and runoff and Svartberget, northern Sweden — Measurement and model analysis. Hydr Proc 16, 3379–3392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bayard D, Stähli M, Parriaux A, Flühler H (2005): The influence of seasonally frozen soils on the snowmelt runoff of two Alpine sites in southern Switzerland. J Hydr 309, 66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shanley JB, Chalmers A (1999): The effect of frozen soil on snowmelt runoff at Sleepers river, Vermont. Hydr Proc 13(12–13) 1843–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stähli M, Jansson PE, Lundin LC (1996): Preferential water flow in a frozen soil — A two domain model approach. Hydr Proc 10, 1305–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Panagopoulos.

Additional information

ESS-Submission Editor: Dr. Willie JGM Peijnenburg (wjgm.peijnenburg@rivm.nl)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panagopoulos, I., Mimikou, M. & Kapetanaki, M. Estimation of nitrogen and phosphorus losses to surface water and groundwater through the implementation of the SWAT model for Norwegian soils. J Soils Sediments 7, 223–231 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2007.04.219

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2007.04.219

Keywords

Navigation