We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
This article analyzes the surprisingly consistent way in which Sadeq Hedayat's novella, The Blind Owl, represents the concept of eternal recurrence. Hedayat employs repetition in a unique manner. Neither narrator ever remarks upon or seems to notice that events, motifs, and similar or identical epithets and phrasings which arise in their own thoughts and utterances are repeating, but they rather encounter every repeated event or thought as if it had only just occurred for the first time. While I do not claim that Hedayat was in any meaningful way a ‘Nietzschean’ thinker, philosophical ideas from Nietzsche's works and those of the French thinkers who came after, most notably Klossowski and Deleuze, interact strikingly with The Blind Owl and seem to bring hitherto unnoticed dimensions of this important work to our attention. Notably, Hedayat depicts a struggle with nihilism that is informed by the philosophical questions surrounding what came to be known as existentialism, but in a manner that is not merely derivative of European models.
1 Hedayat, Sadeq, The Blind Owl, trans. by Costello, D. P. (New York, 1957), 41–42Google Scholar.
2 Ibid., 115.
3 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Beyond Good and Evil (New York, 1989), 68Google Scholar.
4 Pascal, Blaise, Pensées (New York, 1966), 89Google Scholar.
5 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, The Portable Nietzsche (New York, 1976), 330Google Scholar.
6 Klossowski, Pierre, Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle (London, 1997), 52Google Scholar.
7 Deleuze, Gilles, Nietzsche and Philosophy (New York, 1986), 193Google Scholar.
8 Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Gay Science (New York, 1974), 273Google Scholar.
9 Klossowski, Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, x.
10 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Writings from the Late Notebooks (Cambridge, 2003), 138Google Scholar.
11 Ibid., 26.
12 Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Will to Power (New York, 1967), 366Google Scholar.
13 Klossowski, Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, 38.
14 Ibid., 55.
15 Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, 354, passim.
16 Costello, The Blind Owl, 74–75.
17 http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/bashiri/BlindOwl/blindowl.html, Iraj Bashiri translation (emphasis added).
19 Ibid., 110.
18 Costello, The Blind Owl, 40.
20 Ibid., 2.
21 Ibid., 90.
22 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Ecce Homo (New York, 1954), 223Google Scholar.
23 Deleuze, Gilles, The Logic of Sense (New York, 1990), p. 173Google Scholar. See also Klossowski, , Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, 23, 152Google Scholar.
24 Costello, The Blind Owl, 90.
25 Ibid., 116.
26 Ibid., 64.
27 Ibid., 98–99.
28 Klossowski, Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, 50.
29 Costello, The Blind Owl, 40.
30 Ibid., 100.
31 Ibid., 26.
32 Ibid., 39–40.
33 See Kafka, Franz, The Complete Stories (New York, 1983), 427Google Scholar.
34 Costello, The Blind Owl, 80.
35 Edgar Poe, Allan, Tales and Sketches, 1831–1842 (Urbana, NY, 2000), 211Google Scholar.
36 Klossowski, Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, 40.
37 Ibid., 23.
38 Deleuze, Gilles, Difference and Repetition (New York, 1989), 298–299Google Scholar.
39 Deleuze, Nietzsche and Philosophy, 25–31.
40 Ibid, 190.
41 Klossowski, Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, 25.
42 Ibid., 76.
43 Deleuze, Difference and Repetition, 18.
44 Costello, The Blind Owl, 114.
45 Ibid., 116.
46 His superhuman feeling, see ibid., 123.
