71
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      From January 2024, all of our readers will be able to access every part of ROAPE as well as its archive without a paywall. This will make ROAPE accessible to a much wider readership, especially in Africa. We need subscriptions and donations to make this revolutionary intiative work. 

      Subscribe and Donate now!

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maintaining corporate dominance after decolonization: the ‘first mover advantage’ of Shell‐BP in Nigeria

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Nigeria's oil industry came into being during colonial rule. Preferential treatment by British colonial authorities had given a British oil company — Shell — a virtual monopoly over oil exploration in the country and Shell has remained the dominant oil company in Nigeria.

            While there is substantial evidence to suggest that Shell‐BP established its dominant position in Nigeria with the support of British colonial officials, it was by no means clear that Shell would be able to maintain this advantageous position. Indeed, the historical record shows that both the Nigerian government and a number of competitors posed a potential threat to Shell's dominant position.

            The purpose of this article is to answer the question why Shell was able to maintain a position of dominance in Nigeria. It examines Nigeria's diversification and nationalisation policies from the late 1950s to‐date with the view of identifying the factors which allowed Shell to maintain its position vis‐à‐vis potential competitors. This investigation is based on the analysis of secondary sources as well as documents from the Public Record Office (PRO) in London and the BP Archive.

            In order to explain Shell's dominance in Nigeria, the article proposes to utilise the concept of a ‘first mover advantage’. On the most basic level, this concept suggests that pioneering firms are able to obtain positive economic profits as the consequence of early market entry, that means, profits in excess of the cost of capital. The article concludes that a micro‐theoretical analysis based on the idea of a ‘first mover advantage’, which explores the position of individual corporate entities within a political economy framework, provides a superior explanation of Shell's dominance in Nigeria as compared to conventional macro‐theoretical structuralist approaches.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            crea20
            CREA
            Review of African Political Economy
            Review of African Political Economy
            0305-6244
            1740-1720
            September 2000
            : 27
            : 85
            : 407-425
            Affiliations
            a Senior Lecturer in International Business at Coventry Business School , Coventry University , Coventry , CV1 5FB , UK E-mail: j.frynas@ 123456coventry.ac.uk
            b Professor of Risk Management , Glasgow Caledonian University, Dept. of Risk and Financial Services , Britannia Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow , G4 0BA , UK E-mail: mpb@ 123456gcal.ac.uk
            c Senior Lecturer in Management at Coventry Business School , Coventry University , Coventry , CV1 5FB , UK E-mail: bsx142@ 123456coventry.ac.uk
            Article
            8704475 Review of African Political Economy, Vol. 27, No. 85, September 2000, pp. 407-425
            10.1080/03056240008704475
            8dbb9ce0-ad5b-4346-a3ab-f1fe42231a39

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 33, Pages: 19
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Sociology,Economic development,Political science,Labor & Demographic economics,Political economics,Africa

            Bibliography

            1. Adepetun Adesola. . ‘Nigeria's Oil and Gas Potential’. In: . paper presented at the Africa‐Upstream 96 Conference; . September 18–20– ; , Cape Town .

            2. Alli Olayinka R. . 1997. . “‘Joint Venture Investments and MOU Incentives: An Appraisal’. ”. In Nigerian Petroleum Business — A Handbook . , Edited by: Eromosele Victor E. . Lagos : : Advent Communications. .

            3. Aluko Olajide. . 1990. . “‘The Nationalisation of the Assets of British Petroleum’. ”. In The Structure and Processes of Foreign Policy Making and Implementation in Nigeria, 1960–1990 . , Edited by: Olusanya Gabriel O. . Lagos : : Nigerian Institute of International Affairs. .

            4. Ashton‐Jones Nick. . 1998. . The Human Ecosystem of the Niger Delta: An ERA Handbook . , (Environmental Rights Action).

            5. Atsegbua Lawrence Asekome. . 1997. . ‘The assignment and revocation of oil licences and leases in Nigeria. . Oil and Gas Law and Taxation Review . , Vol. 15((9)): 346––348. .

            6. Avuru Austin. . 1997. . “‘Indigenous Participation Upstream: The Challenges and Prospects’. ”. In Nigerian Petroleum Business — A Handbook . , Edited by: Eromosele Victor E. . Lagos : : Advent Communications. .

            7. Barrows Company. . 1995. . World Petroleum Arrangements . , Vol. Volume II. , New York : : Barrows Company. .

            8. Flowers Edward B. . 1976. . ‘Oligopolistic Reactions in European and Canadian Direct Investment in the United States’. . Journal of International Business Studies . , : 43––55. .

            9. Frynas J G. . 1998. . ‘Political Instability and Business: Focus on Shell in Nigeria’. . Third World Quarterly . , Vol. 19((3)): 457––478. .

            10. Frynas J G and Beck Matthias P. . ‘Corporate Hegemony and Colonial Heritage: the First Mover Advantage of Shell‐BP in Nigeria’. In: . Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the African Studies Association (ASA); . 29 October — 1 November. ; , Chicago , Illinois .

            11. Gibbs David N. . 1995. . ‘Political Parties and International Relations: The United States and the Decolonization of Sub‐Saharan Africa’. . International History Review . , Vol. 17((2)): 306––327. .

            12. Kerin Roger A, Varadarajan P Rajan and Peterson Robert A. . 1992. . ‘First‐mover Advantage: a Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions’. . Journal of Marketing . , Vol. 56((October)): 33––52. .

            13. Khan Sarah Ahmad. . 1994. . Nigeria: The Political Economy of Oil . , Oxford : : Oxford University Press. .

            14. Knickerbocker Frederick T. . 1973. . Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise . , Boston , Mass : : Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University. .

            15. Lieberman Marvin B and Montgomery David B. . 1988. . ‘First‐Mover Advantages’. . Strategic Management Journal . , Vol. 9((Summer)): 41––58. .

            16. Glass Harold E. , ed. 1990. . “‘Strategy of Market Entry: To Pioneer or Follow?’. ”. In Handbook of Business Strategy . , New York : : Warren, Gorham & Lamont. .

            17. 1998. . ‘First‐mover (Dis)Advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource‐based View’. . Strategic Management Journal . , Vol. 19((12)): 1111––1125. .

            18. Madujibeya S A. . 1975. . ‘Nigerian Oil: A Review of Nigeria's Petroleum Industry’. . Standard and Chartered Review . , : 2––10. .

            19. NNPC (Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation). . January. 1986a . Annual Statistical Bulletin January‐December 1985 . , January. , Lagos : : NNPC. .

            20. 1986b. . “‘Understanding the Nigerian Oil Industry’. ”. Lagos : : NNPC. .

            21. Obi Cyril and Soremekun Kayode. . 1995. . “‘Oil and the Nigerian State: an Overview’. ”. In Perspectives on the Nigerian Oil Industry . , Edited by: Soremekun Kayode. . Lagos : : Amkra Books. .

            22. Petroconsultants. . (December). 1998 . ‘Foreign Scouting Service: Nigeria, December 1997’ . , (December). , Geneva : : Petroconsultants. .

            23. Quinlan Martin. . 1992. . ‘New Look Comes With New Risks, Nigeria — a Special Report’. . Petroleum Economist . , Vol. 59((3)): 21––25. .

            24. 1999. . ‘Prospects for a New Beginning’. . Petroleum Economist . , Vol. 66((May)): 3––5. .

            25. Sampson Anthony. . 1975. . The Seven Sisters . , London : : Hodder and Stoughton. .

            26. Schätzl L H. . 1969. . Petroleum in Nigeria . , Ibadan : : Oxford University Press. .

            27. Soremekun Kayode. . 1995. . “‘Presidential System and Petroleum Policy (1979–1983)’. ”. In Perspectives on the Nigerian Oil Industry . , Edited by: Soremekun Kayode. . Lagos : : Amkra Books. .

            28. Tellis Gerard and Golder Peter. . 1996. . ‘First to Market, First to Fail? Real Causes of Enduring Market Leadership’. . Sloan Management Review . , Vol. 37((2)): 65––75. .

            29. Turner Terisa. . 1977. . “‘Government and Oil in Nigeria: A Study of the Making and Implementation of Petroleum Policy’. ”.

            30. Panter‐Brick Keith. , ed. 1978. . “‘Commercial Capitalism and the 1975 Coup’. ”. In Soldiers and Oil: the Political Transformation of Nigeria . , London : : Frank Cass. .

            31. Collins Paul. , ed. 1980. . “‘The Working of the Nigerian National Oil Corporation’. ”. In Administration for Development in Nigeria . , Lagos : : African Education Press. .

            32. Turner Terisa and Badru Pade. . 1984. . ‘Oil and Instability: Class Contradictions and the 1983 Coup in Nigeria’. . Journal of African Marxists . , Vol. 7((March)): 4––21. .

            33. Whiteman Arthur. . 1982. . Nigeria: Its Petroleum Geology, Resources and Potential . , Vol. Volume 2. , London : : Graham & Trotman. .

            Comments

            Comment on this article