87
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Acceptance and Leadership--Hegemonies of E-Commerce Policy Perspectives

      research-article
      ,
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      E-COMMERCE Policy, Policy Analysis, Hegemony, Policy Typology
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper presents an analysis of the e-Commerce policies developed and implemented in the USA, Canada, Australia, Victoria, Finland, Norway, the UK, Ireland, the EU (by the OECD), Singapore, Japan, Malaysia, Thailand and Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region). The paper shows that e-Commerce policy adopted is generally trying to achieve two fundamental aims: 1. to minimize regulatory environments for e-Commerce; and 2. to ease logistical problems in doing e-Commerce - i.e. in paying electronically, in delivery of goods and in customs, tariffs and duties. These strategies are designed to create an environment where e-Commerce is adopted by business and government in these countries to achieve 'best practice', to become 'modern', to gain 'efficiencies', because 'it is the way to go', because 'we must have it, because everybody has it', and because they 'perceive the benefits of it'. In essence it is being used to gain hegemony in the economic competitiveness of the geopolitical environment created by the Internet. This paper argues that differentiating types of policy is related to ideology and hegemony in the various countries.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            March 2002
            : 20
            : 1
            : 39-57
            Article
            10032441 Prometheus, Vol. 20, No. 1, March 2002, pp. 39-57
            10.1080/08109020110110916
            af64132d-e7a7-49f2-a177-d12fb6bf122e
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 56, Pages: 19
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            Policy Analysis,E-COMMERCE Policy,Policy Typology,Hegemony

            References

            1. Corbitt B. J.. 1999. . 'Exploring the social construction of FT policy--Thailand and Singapore'. . Prometheus . , Vol. 17((3)): 309––21. .

            2. Gramsci A.. 1971. . Selections from the Prison Notebook, edited and translated by Quintin Hoare & Goffrey Nowell Smith . , London : : Lawrence and Wishart. .

            3. Strinati D.. 1995. . An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture . , p. 165 London : : Routledge. .

            4. Lee C. Y., Corbitt B. and Kong W. C.. 'Stakeholder relationships and e-Commerce differentiation: a preliminary investigation in Singapore and Australia'. In: . Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems; . June. . pp.p. 1––3. . Hong Kong: : HK University of Science and Technology. .

            5. Corbitt B. J.. 2000. . 'Developing intraorganisational electronic commerce strategy: an ethnographic study'. . Journal of Information Technology . , Vol. 165:: 119––30. .

            6. Ransome P. and Antoni G.. 1992. . A New Introduction, Harvester Wheatsheaf . , Hertfordshire : : Hemel Hempstead. .

            7. Simon R.. 1991. . Gramsci's Political Thought: An Introduction . , London : : Lawrence and Wishart. .

            8. Self P.. 1981. . “'Planning: rational or political?'. ”. In Policy Analysis and Policy Innovation: Patterns, Problems and Potentials . , Edited by: Baehr P. R. and Wittrock B.. p. 221––36. . London : : Sage Publications. .

            9. Gershuny J. I.. “'What should forecasters do?'. ”. Edited by: Baehr and Wittrock. . p. 193––207. .

            10. Corbitt B. J.. 1997. . 'Implementing policy for homeless kids in schools: re-assessing the micro and macro levels in the policy debate in Australia'. . Journal of Education Policy . , Vol. 12((3)): 165––76. .

            11. Ball S. J.. 1990. . Politics and Policy Making in Education . , London : : Routledge and Kegan Paul. .

            12. Bosetti L., Landy D. and Miklos E.. 1989. . 'Critical perspectives on educational planning and policy analysis'. . The Canadian Administrator . , Vol. 29((2)): 1––7. .

            13. Hofferbert R. I.. 1986. . The Peach and Grasp of Policy Analysis: Comparative Views of the Craft . , France : : Cahier de L'ldheap. .

            14. Rein M.. 1983. . From Policy to Practice . , p. 115 New York : : M.E. Sharpe, Macmillan. .

            15. Wallace M.. 1991. . 'Contradictory interests in policy implementation: the case of LEA development plans for schools'. . Journal of Education Policy . , Vol. 6((4)): 385––99. .

            16. Habermas J.. 1976. . Legitimation Crisis . , London : : Heinemann. .

            17. Giddens A.. 1979. . Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis . , p. 215––16. . Great Britain: : Macmillan. .

            18. Sabatier P. and Mazmanian D.. 1983. . “'Policy implementation'. ”. In Encyclopaedia of Public Policy . , Edited by: Nagel S. S.. New York : : Manuel Dekker. .

            19. Forester J.. 1989. . Planning in the Face of Power . , California : : University of California Press. .

            20. Foucault M.. 1977. . The Archeology of Knowledge . , p. 66 London : : Tavistock. .

            21. Kenway J.. 1990. . “'Education and right's discursive politics: private versus state schooling'. ”. In Foucault and Education . , Edited by: Ball S. J.. p. 175 London : : Routledge. .

            22. Hatcher R. and Troyna B.. 1994. . 'The policy cycle: a Ball by Ball account'. . Journal of Education Policy . , Vol. 9((2)): 167

            23. Geller H. and Johnston A.. 1990. . 'Policy as linear and non-linear science'. . Journal of Education Policy . , Vol. 5((1)): 49––65. .

            24. Kogan M.. 1975. . Educational Decision Making . , London : : Allen and Unwin. .

            25. Ball S. J.. 1993. . 'What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes'. . Discourse . , Vol. 13((2)): 10––17. .

            26. Thanasankit T.. 1999. . “'Exploring social aspects of requirements engineering--an ethnographic study of Thai systems analysts'. ”. University of Melbourne. .

            27. Clinton W. and Gore A.. 1997. . A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce . Washington, DC :

            28. USDC. . 1999. . The Emerging Digital Economy II . , Washington, DC , , USA: : US Department of Commerce. .

            29. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). . 16-18 February. 1999 . Electronic Commerce . 16-18 February. ,

            30. Industry Canada. . 1998. . Building Trust in the Digital Economy .

            31. OECD. . 1999. . The Economic and Social Impact of Electronic Commerce: Preliminary Findings and Research Agenda . , Paris , , France: : OECD. .

            32. The British Chambers of Commerce. . 16 May. 2000 . Chambers Launch Secure E-Commerce Package . 16 May. ,

            33. Singapore Government. . 2000. . Singapore Launches Electronic Commerce Master Plan .

            34. Wong P. K.. 1998. . 'Leveraging the global information revolution for economic development: Singapore's evolving information industry strategy'. . Information Systems Research . , Vol. 9((4)) December;: 323––41. .

            35. Department of State Development. . July. 1999 . Global Victoria: Victorian Government Information Technology and Multimedia Policy . , July. , State of Victoria : : Government Printer. .

            36. National Electronic Commerce Committee (NECC). . 7 October. 1997 . Malaysia's Position on E-Commerce . 7 October. ,

            37. United Nations on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). . 1998. . Model Law on Electronic Commerce .

            38. Shannon D., Baker and McKenzie. . 1998. . 'Legal and regulatory issues'. . APEC Task Force on Electronic Commerce . ,

            39. Department of Technology and Industry. . April. 1999 . Responses to: Building Confidence in Electronic Commerce--A Consultation Document . April. ,

            40. Wong P. K.. 1996. . 'Implementing the Nil vision: Singapore's experience and future challenges'. . Information Infrastructure and Policy . , Vol. 5((2)): 95––117. .

            41. Teo T. S. H., Lim V. K. G. and Lai R. Y. C.. 1997. . 'Users and uses of the Internet: the case of Singapore'. . International Journal of Information Management . , Vol. 17((5)): 330––31. .

            42. Kong W. . 1998. . “'Electronic Transactions Act 1998 and the national information infrastructure--a new scene for doing business in Singapore'. ”. Department of Information Systems, The University of Melbourne. .

            43. Kong W. C.. 1999. . “'Issues affecting the implementation of Electronic Commerce in SMEs in Singapore'. ”. Australia: : Department of Information Systems, University of Melbourne. .

            44. Singapore: National Computer Board. . 1998. . Main Guiding Principles .

            45. HK Special Administrative Region Government. . November. 1998 . Digital 21: Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region Information Technology Strategy . November. ,

            Comments

            Comment on this article