Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:53:45.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives on Allyn Young in Theories of Endogenous Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Roger J. Sandilands
Roger J. Sandilands
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde, 100 Cathedral Street, Glasglow G4 0LN, United Kingdom.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A central message of Allyn Abbott Young's (1928) seminal paper on increasing returns and economic progress was the seeming tautology that “the division of labor depends in large part upon the division of labor.” From this he deduced that a major source of growth is growth itself. In this fundamental sense growth is endogenous and cumulative. He spoke of the “togetherness” of economic phenomena and doubted that the apparatus of supply and demand and marginal productivity theory could be integrated to give the social picture or explain why growth tends to be self-sustaining rather than self-exhausting.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 309 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramovitz, M. 1956. “Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 46 (05): 5–23.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P.. 1998. Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X.. 1995. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Blitch, C. P. 1983. “Allyn Young: a Curious Case of Professional Neglect.” History of Political Economy 15 (Spring): 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blitch, C. P. 1990. “Kaldor's Lecture Notes from Allyn Young's London School of Economics Class, 1928–29.” History of Political Economy 22 (Fall): 443–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blitch, C. P. 1995. Allyn Young: The Peripatetic Economist. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Charles and Douglas, Paul. 1928. “A Theory of Production.” American Economic Review, supplement (03): 139–65.Google Scholar
Council of Economic Advisers. 1993. Economic Report of the President. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Currie, Lauchlin. 1966, Accelerating Development: The Necessity and the Means. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Currie, Lauchlin. 1971. “The Exchange Constraint on Development: A Partial Solution to the Problem.” Economic Journal 81 (12): 886–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Lauchlin. 1974. “The 'Leading Sector' Model of Growth in Developing Countries.” Journal of Economic Studies 1 (05): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Lauchlin. 1981. “Allyn Young and the Development of Growth Theory.” Journal of Economic Studies 8 (3: 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Lauchlin. 1986 “Sources of Growth.” World Development 14: 541–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Lauchlin. 1997. “Implications of an Endogenous Theory of Growth in Allyn Young's Macroeconomic Concept of Increasing Returns.” History of Political Economy 29 (Fall): 414–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, M. 1962. “The Production Function in Allocation and Growth: A Synthesis.” American Economic Review 52 (12): 955–1022.Google Scholar
Grier, K. and Tullock, G.. 1989. “An Empirical Analysis of Cross-National Economic Growth, 1951–80.” Journal of Monetary Economics 24 (09): 259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E.. 1991a. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E.. 1991b. “Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth.” Review of Economic Studies 58: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1961. “Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth.” In Lutz, F. A. and Hague, D. C., eds., The Theory of Economic Growth. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 177–222.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1966. Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1972. “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics.” Economic Journal 82 (12): 1237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1975 “What Is Wrong with Economic Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 89 (3): 347–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1985. Economics Without Equilibrium. Cardiff, Wales: University College Cardiff Press.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1986. “Limits on Growth.” Oxford Economic Papers 38 (2): 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Neil M. 1997. Pattern in Corporate Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, M., Loayza, N. and Villanueva, D.. 1993. “Testing the Neoclassical Theory of Economic Growth.” IMF Staff Papers 40: 512–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1990. Rethinking International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1993. “Toward a Counter-Counterrevolution in Development Theory.” Annual Conference on Development Economics 1992. Washington DC: The World Bank, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1994 “The Myth of Asia's Miracle.” Foreign Affairs (11/12): 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul and Obstfeld, Maurice. 1997. International Economics: Theory and Policy. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Laidler, David. 1993. “Hawtrey, Harvard, and the Origins of the Chicago School.” Journal of Political Economy 101 (6): 1068–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loasby, Brian. 1999. “Marshall's Theory of the Firm.” In Backhouse, Roger E. and Greedy, John, eds., From Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honour of D.P. O'Brien. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 175–93.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Peter J. and Sandilands, Roger J.. 1986. “The Trade Sector in a Very Open Re-export Economy: The Case of Singapore.” In Lloyd, P.J. and Lim, C. Y., eds., Singapore: Resources and Growth. Singapore and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–220.Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machovec, Frank M. 1995. Perfect Competition and the Transformation of Economics. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D. and Weil, D. N.. 1992. “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 407–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrling, Perry G. and Sandilands, Roger J., eds. 1999. Money and Growth: Selected Papers of Allyn Abbott Young. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Kevin M., Schleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1989a. “Income Distribution, Market Size, and Industrialization.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (08): 537–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Kevin M., Schleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1989b. “Industrialization and the Big Push.” Journal of Political Economy 97 (5): 1003–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurkse, Ragnar. 1953. Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Denis P. 1984. “The Evolution of the Theory of the Firm.” In Stephen, Frank H., ed., Firms, Organization and Labor. London: Macmillan, pp. 25–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Gavin. 1989. Classical Economic Growth. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul M. 1987. “Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization.” American Economic Review 77 (2): 56–62.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul M. 1989. “Capital Accumulation in the Theory of Long-Run Growth.” In Barro, Robert J., ed., Modern Business Cycle Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 52–127.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul M. 1994 “The Origins of Endogenous Growth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstein-Rodan, Paul. 1943. “Problems of Industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe.” Economic Journal 53 (06–09): 202–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandilands, Roger J. 1990. The Life and Political Economy of Lauchlin Currie: New Dealer, Presidential Adviser and Development Economist. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sandilands, Roger J. 1992. “Savings, Investment and Housing in Singapore's Growth, 1965–90.” Savings and Development 16 (2): 119–43.Google Scholar
Sandilands, Roger J. 1999. “New Evidence on the Style and Influence of Allyn Young as a Teacher.” Journal of Economic Studies 26 (6): 453–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1954. “Two Concepts of External Economies.” Journal of Political Economy 62 (04): 143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, G. K. 1992. “Policy Implications of Endogenous Growth Theory.” Economic Journal 102 (05): 611–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Robert M. 1956. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (02): 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Robert M. 1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (08): 311–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. 1993. “Comment on a Counter-Counterrevolution in Development Theory.” Annual Conference on Development Economics 1992. Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 39–49.Google Scholar
Thirlwall, A. P. 1986. “A General Model of Growth and Development on Kaldorian Lines.” Oxford Economic Papers 38: 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 1992. The East Asian Miracle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Allyn A. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal 38 (12): 527–42. Reprinted in Mehrling and Sandilands, 1999, pp. 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Allyn A. 1929a. “The Sources of Wealth.” In The Book of Popular Science. New York: Grolier Society, Group IX Ch. 26: 3505–13. Reprinted in Mehrling and Sandilands, 1999, pp. 231–38.Google Scholar
Young, Allyn A. 1929b. “Big Business: How the Economic System Grows and Evolves Like a Living Organism.” In The Book of Popular Science. New York: Grolier Society, Group IX Ch. 38: 5387–94. Reprinted in Mehrling and Sandilands, 1999, pp. 411–20.Google Scholar
Young, Allyn A. 1990. “Nicholas Kaldor's Notes on Allyn Young's LSE Lectures, 1927–29.” Journal of Economic Studies 17 (3/4): 118–14.Google Scholar
Young, Alwyn. 1992. “Tale of Two Cities: Factor Accumulation and Technical Change in Hong Kong and Singapore.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press, pp. 13–54.Google Scholar
Young, Alwyn. 1994. “Lessons from the East Asian NICs: A Contrarian View.” European Economic Review 38: 964–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Alwyn. 1998, “Growth without Scale Effects.” Journal of Political Economy 106 (02): 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar