Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:26:15.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tercentenary of Henry Martyn's Considerations upon the East-India Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Andrea Maneschi
Andrea Maneschi
Affiliation:
Department of EconomicsVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Henry Martyn's Considerations Upon the East-India Trade, published anonymously in 1701, stands out as a major contribution to the field of political economy that took root in Britain in the eighteenth century, and to the demonstration of the gains from free trade (Martyn 1701). Martyn provided one of the earliest formulations (and by far the clearest) of what Jacob Viner termed the “eighteenth-century rule” for the gains from trade, that “it pays to import commodities from abroad whenever they can be obtained in exchange for exports at a smaller real cost than their production at home would entail” (Viner 1937, p. 440). The numerical examples that Martyn used to illustrate it went even beyond the case for free trade advanced seventy-five years later by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations. Martyn's tract contains other remarkable insights that became important features of classical political economy, such as the nature and advantages of the division of labor, the dependence of the latter on the extent of the market, the workings of a market economy, the role of money, and the impact of international trade on resource allocation, on productivity, and on economic welfare.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 233 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appleby, Joyce O. 1978. Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth-Century England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arkin, Marcus. 1955. “A Neglected Forerunner of Adam Smith: An Appraisal of the Place of Henry Martin's (?) Considerations on the East-India Trade (1701) in the History of Economic Thought.” South African Journal of Economics 23 (4): 299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, William J. 1975. British Economic Thought and India 1600–1858: A Study in the History of Development Economics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beer, Max. 1938. Early British Economics from the Thirteenth to the Middle of the Eighteenth Century. Woking: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bowley, Marian. 1973. Studies in the History of Economic Theory before 1870. New York: Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Terence W. 1988. Before Adam Smith: The Emergence of Political Economy 1662–1776. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A. 1996. Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. A. J. 1937. Predecessors of Adam Smith: The Growth of British Economic Thought. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
King, Charles. 1721. The British Merchant; or, Commerce Preserv'd. London: John Darby.Google Scholar
Lawson, Philip. 1993. The East India Company: A History. London: Longman.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Christine. 1983. “Henry Martin and the Authorship of ‘Considerations upon the East India Trade’.” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 56 (11): 222–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 1994. Mercantilism: The Shaping of an Economic Language. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maneschi, Andrea. 1998. Comparative Advantage in International Trade: A Historical Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martyn, Henry. 1701. Considerations Upon the East-India Trade. In McCulloch, John R., ed., Early English Tracts on Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
McCulloch, John R., ed. 1856. Early English Tracts on Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1848. Principles of Political Economy. London: Longman, Green, 1920.Google Scholar
Myint, Hla. 1958. “The ‘Classical Theory’ of International Trade and the Underdeveloped Countries.” Economic Journal 68 (270): 317–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashid, Salim. 1998. The Myth of Adam Smith. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. In Sraffa, Piero, ed., The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1978. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. J. 1926. Mercantilism and the East India Trade. London: P. S. King & Son.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1937. Studies in the Theory of International Trade. New York: Harper.Google Scholar