- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Thomas Ulvcrona, Henrik Lindberg, Urban Bergsten, Impregnation of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) wood by hydrophobic oil and dispersion patterns in different tissues, Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, Volume 79, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 123–134, https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpi064
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Wood from Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) is biologically degraded in exposed conditions. It also has anatomical features that make it difficult to impregnate with preservatives by currently available industrial processes. In the study reported here, we used the new Linotech process to impregnate Norway spruce wood with hydrophobic linseed oil and then quantified its uptake and dispersal in anatomically distinct wood tissues. We also investigated the effects of the wood moisture content on the results of the impregnation. Samples (500 × 25 × 25 mm) were taken from 15 trees in a coniferous forest in northern Sweden (64° 10′ N, 160–320 m a.s.l.). The parameters for the Linotech process were 2–3 h treatment time at 0.8–1.4 MPa and 60–140°C. To determine the level of uptake, the linseed oil was extracted from the impregnated wood using methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether. The uptake was quantitatively analysed by comparing X-ray microdensitometry values obtained following impregnation both before and after oil removal. In earlywood, initial moisture content had an obvious effect on the impregnation result. Six times more oil was taken up when the moisture content was greater than ~150 per cent than when it was less than 30 per cent. Theoretical calculations, based on density levels, suggest that the water-filled porosity of the wood (water volume divided by porosity volume) was positively correlated with the linseed oil uptake, and more strongly correlated in earlywood than in latewood. There were also significant differences in uptake between different wood tissues; heartwood/mature wood and heartwood/juvenile wood showed 10–20 per cent weight increases due to linseed oil uptake, compared with 30–50 per cent in sapwood/mature wood. Examination by scanning electron microscopy confirmed these uptake patterns. The moisture content after impregnation was about 5 per cent, irrespective of the Linotech process parameters, tissue type and initial moisture content. In conclusion, the impregnation process used here results in high levels of well-dispersed linseed oil uptake and should facilitate drying.
Introduction
Various techniques and preservatives are used in wood preservation. An environmentally important task for the future is to develop substitutes for copper/chromium-based wood treatments (Megnis et al., 2002; Humar et al., 2004). One possibility is to use non-toxic preservatives like hydrophobic oils. Such oils have the capacity, if applied appropriately, to keep moisture content below the critical levels required for wood-decaying fungi to germinate and grow (Eckeveld et al., 2001). Another advantage is that they reduce the wood's ability to absorb moisture, thus improving dimensional stability. Water-repelling characteristics have been shown to increase after impregnation of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sapwood with linseed oil (Schneider, 1980), coconut oil and various tall oils (Eckeveld et al., 2001).
A specific problem with Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) wood is that it is difficult to impregnate cost-efficiently using currently available commercial processes (Wardrop and Davies, 1961; Bailey and Preston, 1969; Banks, 1970; Boutelje, 1983; Vinden, 1984; EN 350-2, 1994). In Europe, Norway spruce wood is widely used in construction, e.g. as house panel material, decking and poles; therefore, a method that successfully protects it against degradation would be of high economic value. The permeability of wood is strongly dependent on its moisture content (Hansmann et al., 2002), as well as the principal direction of the grain (Bramhall, 1971; Bolton, 1988) and various physical and chemical properties (Wardrop and Davies, 1961; Banks, 1970; Baines and Saur, 1985; Hansmann et al., 2002). A very large reduction in the permeability of spruce occurs during drying (Banks, 1970), largely due to permanent structural changes that occur in wood during the drying process, mainly as a result of the aspiration of bordered pits (Vinden, 1984). In Norway spruce, a ray cell's relative porous area is estimated to comprise only 5 per cent of the total cell wall area, compared with 50 per cent in Scots pine, a non-refractory species (Nyrén and Back, 1960). Furthermore, the parenchymatic cell wall is thicker in Norway spruce than in Scots pine (Liese and Bauch, 1967). Ray tracheids in spruce are also often interrupted by a parenchyma cell at the junction of the annual ring, which may explain why penetration often stops abruptly at a particular annual ring (Baines and Saur, 1985).
Linseed oil is a hydrophobic and environmentally gentle product that is often used in paints, varnishes and stains for protecting surfaces. It is an organic oil, derived by pressing or extracting linseeds (flax seeds), but has not been used as a wood preservative in conventional impregnation techniques. However, recently it was successfully tested on Scots pine in a new commercial impregnation process: the Linotech process (Olsson et al., 2001; Megnis et al., 2002). The process may provide an economically viable preservative treatment for Norway spruce.
The objective of this study was to quantify the amount of a hydrophobic linseed oil derivative taken up, at both macroscopic and microscopic levels, when used in the Linotech process to impregnate Norway spruce wood. Since anatomically and chemically distinct wood tissues are likely to respond differently to the impregnation process (see earlier discussion) we also compared uptake patterns in (1) heartwood and sapwood; (2) mature wood and juvenile wood; and (3) earlywood and latewood. In addition, dispersion of linseed oil within the year rings and tracheid cells was studied.
Materials and methods
Experimental design and sample preparation
In total, 15 Norway spruce trees from three stands in a mixed coniferous forest in northern Sweden (64° 10′ N, 19° 46′ E, 160–320 m a.s.l.) were sampled. The sampling criteria were that selected trees should be clearly dominant and free from visible defects and diseases. The trees' total age, total height and diameter at breast height were 131–189 years, 21.4–30.2 m and 261–502 mm, respectively. Site quality according to Hägglund and Lundmark (1982) was 4.5–5.5 m3 ha−1 year−1. Heartwood samples were taken from five trees and sapwood samples from 10 trees (Figure 1). Three types of wood samples were collected, corresponding to three types of tissue: heartwood/mature wood, heartwood/juvenile wood and sapwood/mature wood. The dimensions of each sample were 500 × 25 × 25 mm (longitudinal × radial × tangential). Samples were delivered in fresh un-dried condition to the treatment facility, at Linotech Industries, where they were generally treated according to a standard protocol designed to promote uptake of oil at a low rate. However, a higher uptake protocol, with higher pressures and longer treatment times, was also tested to evaluate the effects of varying these process parameters on the oil uptake patterns. The linseed oil derivative Linogard was used as an impregnant to reduce moisture uptake and oxygen transport in the wood. The processing time was 2–3 h and pressures and temperatures of 0.8–1.4 MPa and 60–140°C were applied. A patent for application of the Linotech process to Norway spruce has been applied for, but not yet granted, so this paper does not describe the impregnation process any further (cf. Olsson et al., 2001).
Nine samples of heartwood/mature wood, and nine samples of heartwood/juvenile wood were selected to form three replicate batches (1, 2 and 3), each including three of both kinds of sample. Four replicates of 10 sapwood samples were also made, one of which were added to batch 2 and one to batch 3 (Figure 1). Batches 1, 2 and 3 were impregnated using the low uptake protocol. The higher uptake protocol was only applied to sapwood samples (two batches, designated 4 and 5, each including 10 samples (see Figure 1). In all, six heartwood samples and 20 sapwood samples, which were not impregnated with either protocol, were used as controls.
Tests on samples before treatment
The density, moisture content and resin content for each sample were measured on smaller samples (5 × 10 × 5 mm) of wood adjacent to the samples used in the impregnation tests. The global density was determined by measuring the dry weight after drying at 106°C, and the volume was determined using the water-displacement method. The moisture content (per cent of wood dry weight) was calculated as the difference between the weights before and after the drying process according to Standard Method EN 384 (1995). To determine the resin content of the samples, their volume and dry weight were measured as given earlier and they were then placed in a methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether (MTBE) bath for 2 days followed by a further half day in a bath of fresh MTBE. Their resin contents (or, more precisely, their MTBE-extractable contents) were then calculated by subtracting their post-extraction weights from their respective pre-extraction weights. The samples of the control batch were analysed in the same way. The estimated resin contents were later used to adjust the amount of linseed oil that was taken up.
Macroscopic analyses
Three 2-mm-thick vertical slices were cut from each impregnated wood sample: one from the bottom part, one from the top part (30 mm from the respective ends) and one from the middle part (Figure 2). One half of the middle slice was used for weight analysis and the other half for X-ray microdensitometry analysis.
Weight measurements were taken to collect information about the variation of oil impregnation into the samples in the vertical and horizontal directions. Three half-slices were used (as described earlier) for this purpose: one from the bottom end, one from the middle end and one from the top end. Each of these half-slices was further cut into three pieces, perpendicular to the preceding cut, each representing a third of the horizontal profile of the respective sample (Figure 2), and their volumes were measured using the water-displacement method. After drying at 60°C, they were weighed to determine their dry weight with linseed oil (EN 384, 1995). The oil was subsequently extracted from the wood with MTBE in a two-step process; first for 24 h then for 48 h, ending in both cases with 15 min in an ultrasonic bath (Lalman and Bagley, 2004). They were then dried again (as discussed earlier), re-weighed and the difference in pre- and post-extraction weights was assumed to be equal to the weight of linseed oil taken up during the impregnation process (EN 384, 1985), which was then expressed as a percentage of the wood's dry weight.
Microscopic analyses
Nine of the 40 impregnated sapwood samples with an even oil distribution were chosen for X-ray microdensitometry analysis. For this purpose, half of the middle slice of each selected sample (see earlier discussion) was mounted on a tray and exposed to X-rays in a Woodtrax instrument (Figure 2). Minimum density, earlywood mean density, latewood mean density and maximum density within annual ring values were determined for each sample from the Woodtrax images by analysing three 1-mm bands located approximately in the middle and 3 mm from each edge of the half-slices. Annual rings in images from the Woodtrax analysis that had an earlywood percentage before extraction that was within ±5 per cent of the measured earlywood percentage after extraction were included in the numerical analysis. The earlywood percentage was calculated from the proportion of the total annual ring width that earlywood accounted for. The oil content, as a percentage of wood dry weight, was obtained from the Woodtrax data. The oil was extracted from the wood in a two-step process as described earlier, and the X-ray measurements were then repeated. The uptake was quantified by comparing the density values of each half-slice examined pre- and post-extraction of the oil, after correcting for the resin contents of each annual ring, determined as described earlier.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were carried out on the samples chosen for X-ray analyses to evaluate the range in level of oil uptake using a CamScan S4-80DV electron microscope. Three consecutive 6- × 6- × 5-mm specimens were taken from one end of each 30-mm sample and sputter coated with gold to allow SEM examination of the wood from the surface through to the centre of sample.
Calculation of water-filled porosity
The water-filled porosity of samples examined by macroscopic and microscopic analyses was calculated as follows. First, the porosity (P) was determined from the average density values obtained from the macroscopic or microscopic analyses in combination with the mean value for cell wall density given by Dinwoodie (2000) of 1500 kg m−3.
The percentage of water-filled porosity in the sample was then calculated as: available water volume in 1 m3 of wood/porosity (P) in 1 m3 of wood.
The available water volume in cubic metres was calculated as: (mean density value × initial moisture content) × (1 – 0.3), where 0.3 is assumed to be the fibre saturation point (30 per cent moisture content).
The average porosity in 1 m3 of the wood used in the microscopy analyses was then calculated by summing P for earlywood × xe + P for latewood × xl, where xe and xl are the corresponding proportions of annual ring width obtained from the Woodtrax analysis.
Oil uptake and water-filled porosity values based on macroscopic calculations are presented only for batch 4 (processed using the high uptake protocol) since they show the clearest interaction between the two factors. Results from microscopic calculations are based on data obtained from samples impregnated in batches 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using MINITAB 13 software (Anonymous, 1999). Data were tested for normality and heteroscedasticity. No transformations were considered necessary. To test differences between process parameters, tissue types and vertical and horizontal location in samples, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using the general linear model procedure. Batch and replicate were considered random factors. Differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05. Data from all heartwood and sapwood samples in batches 2 and 3 (Figure 1) were used to test for significant differences in uptake patterns between heartwood/mature wood, heartwood/juvenile wood and sapwood. Data from all heartwood samples from batches 1, 2 and 3 were used to tests for significant differences between heartwood/mature wood and heartwood/juvenile wood. Three-factor interactions are not presented in ANOVA tables because they did not add any significant information to the results. To test differences between earlywood and latewood, a paired t test was performed where the difference was calculated by subtracting the uptake value in latewood from the uptake value in earlywood. Since there were no significant differences in average oil uptake between the two process protocols (designed to give standard and higher uptake rates), only results from the standard regime are generally presented here. Exceptions are for the microscopic evaluation of oil uptake, where sapwood samples subjected to both protocols were used and for the macroscopic analysis of oil uptake at different levels of water-filled porosity, where results from batches 4 and 5 are presented.
Results
Macroscopic oil uptake
The weight increase due to oil uptake was higher for sapwood/mature wood than for other types of tissue, but there were no differences in oil uptake between the two heartwood types (Tables 1 and 2). There was a significant interaction between wood tissue type and vertical location in the sapwood samples; with uptake being higher at the lower and upper ends of the samples compared with the middle end. Heartwood types did not show this tendency (Table 2). The factor replicate (Table 1) refers to within-batch replicates of wood tissue types, which explains its high significance.
Source . | df . | Adj SS . | Adj MS . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tissue type | 2 | 9472.47 | 4736.24 | 51.16 | 0.019 |
Batch | 1 | 12.80 | 12.80 | 0.12 | 0.753 |
Vertical location in sample | 2 | 223.81 | 111.90 | 5.86 | 0.146 |
Horizontal location in sample | 2 | 18.30 | 9.15 | 0.44 | 0.693 |
Tissue type × batch | 2 | 185.16 | 92.58 | 0.43 | 0.657 |
Tissue type × vertical location in sample | 4 | 510.86 | 127.71 | 30.99 | 0.030 |
Tissue type × horizontal location in sample | 4 | 99.93 | 24.98 | 0.71 | 0.627 |
Batch × vertical location in sample | 2 | 38.19 | 19.10 | 2.58 | 0.140 |
Batch × horizontal location in sample | 2 | 41.30 | 20.65 | 0.63 | 0.578 |
Vertical location in sample × horizontal location in sample | 4 | 36.95 | 9.24 | 1.69 | 0.235 |
Replicate (tissue type batch) | 25 | 6636.68 | 265.47 | 3.73 | 0.000 |
Vertical location in sample × replicate (tissue type batch) | 50 | 2698.78 | 53.98 | 8.33 | 0.000 |
Horizontal location in sample × replicate (tissue type batch) | 50 | 1186.15 | 23.72 | 3.66 | 0.000 |
Error | 125 | 809.77 | 6.48 | ||
Total | 295 |
Source . | df . | Adj SS . | Adj MS . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tissue type | 2 | 9472.47 | 4736.24 | 51.16 | 0.019 |
Batch | 1 | 12.80 | 12.80 | 0.12 | 0.753 |
Vertical location in sample | 2 | 223.81 | 111.90 | 5.86 | 0.146 |
Horizontal location in sample | 2 | 18.30 | 9.15 | 0.44 | 0.693 |
Tissue type × batch | 2 | 185.16 | 92.58 | 0.43 | 0.657 |
Tissue type × vertical location in sample | 4 | 510.86 | 127.71 | 30.99 | 0.030 |
Tissue type × horizontal location in sample | 4 | 99.93 | 24.98 | 0.71 | 0.627 |
Batch × vertical location in sample | 2 | 38.19 | 19.10 | 2.58 | 0.140 |
Batch × horizontal location in sample | 2 | 41.30 | 20.65 | 0.63 | 0.578 |
Vertical location in sample × horizontal location in sample | 4 | 36.95 | 9.24 | 1.69 | 0.235 |
Replicate (tissue type batch) | 25 | 6636.68 | 265.47 | 3.73 | 0.000 |
Vertical location in sample × replicate (tissue type batch) | 50 | 2698.78 | 53.98 | 8.33 | 0.000 |
Horizontal location in sample × replicate (tissue type batch) | 50 | 1186.15 | 23.72 | 3.66 | 0.000 |
Error | 125 | 809.77 | 6.48 | ||
Total | 295 |
All three tissue types (heartwood/juvenile wood, heartwood/mature wood and sapwood/mature wood) were analysed.
Source . | df . | Adj SS . | Adj MS . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tissue type | 2 | 9472.47 | 4736.24 | 51.16 | 0.019 |
Batch | 1 | 12.80 | 12.80 | 0.12 | 0.753 |
Vertical location in sample | 2 | 223.81 | 111.90 | 5.86 | 0.146 |
Horizontal location in sample | 2 | 18.30 | 9.15 | 0.44 | 0.693 |
Tissue type × batch | 2 | 185.16 | 92.58 | 0.43 | 0.657 |
Tissue type × vertical location in sample | 4 | 510.86 | 127.71 | 30.99 | 0.030 |
Tissue type × horizontal location in sample | 4 | 99.93 | 24.98 | 0.71 | 0.627 |
Batch × vertical location in sample | 2 | 38.19 | 19.10 | 2.58 | 0.140 |
Batch × horizontal location in sample | 2 | 41.30 | 20.65 | 0.63 | 0.578 |
Vertical location in sample × horizontal location in sample | 4 | 36.95 | 9.24 | 1.69 | 0.235 |
Replicate (tissue type batch) | 25 | 6636.68 | 265.47 | 3.73 | 0.000 |
Vertical location in sample × replicate (tissue type batch) | 50 | 2698.78 | 53.98 | 8.33 | 0.000 |
Horizontal location in sample × replicate (tissue type batch) | 50 | 1186.15 | 23.72 | 3.66 | 0.000 |
Error | 125 | 809.77 | 6.48 | ||
Total | 295 |
Source . | df . | Adj SS . | Adj MS . | F . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tissue type | 2 | 9472.47 | 4736.24 | 51.16 | 0.019 |
Batch | 1 | 12.80 | 12.80 | 0.12 | 0.753 |
Vertical location in sample | 2 | 223.81 | 111.90 | 5.86 | 0.146 |
Horizontal location in sample | 2 | 18.30 | 9.15 | 0.44 | 0.693 |
Tissue type × batch | 2 | 185.16 | 92.58 | 0.43 | 0.657 |
Tissue type × vertical location in sample | 4 | 510.86 | 127.71 | 30.99 | 0.030 |
Tissue type × horizontal location in sample | 4 | 99.93 | 24.98 | 0.71 | 0.627 |
Batch × vertical location in sample | 2 | 38.19 | 19.10 | 2.58 | 0.140 |
Batch × horizontal location in sample | 2 | 41.30 | 20.65 | 0.63 | 0.578 |
Vertical location in sample × horizontal location in sample | 4 | 36.95 | 9.24 | 1.69 | 0.235 |
Replicate (tissue type batch) | 25 | 6636.68 | 265.47 | 3.73 | 0.000 |
Vertical location in sample × replicate (tissue type batch) | 50 | 2698.78 | 53.98 | 8.33 | 0.000 |
Horizontal location in sample × replicate (tissue type batch) | 50 | 1186.15 | 23.72 | 3.66 | 0.000 |
Error | 125 | 809.77 | 6.48 | ||
Total | 295 |
All three tissue types (heartwood/juvenile wood, heartwood/mature wood and sapwood/mature wood) were analysed.
Tissue type . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison within batches 2 and 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Heartwood | Sapwood | |||||||||||||||||||||
Juvenile wood | Mature wood | Mature wood | ||||||||||||||||||||
H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | |||||||||||
8.9 | 10.0 | 8.6 | 9.2A | 7.3 | 10.7 | 8.7 | 8.7A | 26.9a | 19.1b | 29.1a | 25.1B | |||||||||||
Comparison within batches 1, 2 and 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Heartwood | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Juvenile wood | Mature wood | |||||||||||||||||||||
H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | |||||||||||||||
8.4 | 9.7 | 7.8 | 8.7 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 8.1 |
Tissue type . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison within batches 2 and 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Heartwood | Sapwood | |||||||||||||||||||||
Juvenile wood | Mature wood | Mature wood | ||||||||||||||||||||
H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | |||||||||||
8.9 | 10.0 | 8.6 | 9.2A | 7.3 | 10.7 | 8.7 | 8.7A | 26.9a | 19.1b | 29.1a | 25.1B | |||||||||||
Comparison within batches 1, 2 and 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Heartwood | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Juvenile wood | Mature wood | |||||||||||||||||||||
H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | |||||||||||||||
8.4 | 9.7 | 7.8 | 8.7 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 8.1 |
Values with different letters are significantly different and are to be compared within the wood type.
Capital letters represent differences between wood types.
H1 = top, H2 = middle and H3 = bottom of sample.
Tissue type . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison within batches 2 and 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Heartwood | Sapwood | |||||||||||||||||||||
Juvenile wood | Mature wood | Mature wood | ||||||||||||||||||||
H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | |||||||||||
8.9 | 10.0 | 8.6 | 9.2A | 7.3 | 10.7 | 8.7 | 8.7A | 26.9a | 19.1b | 29.1a | 25.1B | |||||||||||
Comparison within batches 1, 2 and 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Heartwood | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Juvenile wood | Mature wood | |||||||||||||||||||||
H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | |||||||||||||||
8.4 | 9.7 | 7.8 | 8.7 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 8.1 |
Tissue type . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison within batches 2 and 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Heartwood | Sapwood | |||||||||||||||||||||
Juvenile wood | Mature wood | Mature wood | ||||||||||||||||||||
H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | |||||||||||
8.9 | 10.0 | 8.6 | 9.2A | 7.3 | 10.7 | 8.7 | 8.7A | 26.9a | 19.1b | 29.1a | 25.1B | |||||||||||
Comparison within batches 1, 2 and 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Heartwood | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Juvenile wood | Mature wood | |||||||||||||||||||||
H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | H1 | H2 | H3 | Mean | |||||||||||||||
8.4 | 9.7 | 7.8 | 8.7 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 8.1 |
Values with different letters are significantly different and are to be compared within the wood type.
Capital letters represent differences between wood types.
H1 = top, H2 = middle and H3 = bottom of sample.
There were no significant differences in weight increase between the different batches or the three different horizontal locations within the samples (Table 1).
There was a clear, positive correlation between the pre-impregnation moisture content and oil uptake in sapwood samples (Figure 3). However, there were no clear relationships between the factors density and porosity and linseed oil uptake in the experiments (data not presented).
Microscopic oil uptake
As expected, earlywood generally took up more oil than latewood (Table 3), although the uptake in latewood was higher than in earlywood in two of the nine samples.
Sample number . | Mean uptake earlywood . | Mean uptake latewood . | 95% CI for mean difference . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1002 | 0.097a | 0.047b | 0.045–0.055 | 0.000 |
1004 | 0.068a | 0.056a | −0.01–0.024 | 0.066 |
1005 | 0.068a | 0.036b | 0.028–0.035 | 0.000 |
1006 | 0.217a | 0.204a | 0.0–0.027 | 0.056 |
1008 | 0.037a | 0.022b | 0.01–0.021 | 0.000 |
1012 | 0.055a | 0.039b | 0.011–0.021 | 0.000 |
1017 | 0.124a | 0.267b | −0.162–0.124 | 0.000 |
1027 | 0.359a | 0.209b | 0.114–0.185 | 0.000 |
1050 | 0.047a | 0.253b | −0.232–0.18 | 0.000 |
Sample number . | Mean uptake earlywood . | Mean uptake latewood . | 95% CI for mean difference . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1002 | 0.097a | 0.047b | 0.045–0.055 | 0.000 |
1004 | 0.068a | 0.056a | −0.01–0.024 | 0.066 |
1005 | 0.068a | 0.036b | 0.028–0.035 | 0.000 |
1006 | 0.217a | 0.204a | 0.0–0.027 | 0.056 |
1008 | 0.037a | 0.022b | 0.01–0.021 | 0.000 |
1012 | 0.055a | 0.039b | 0.011–0.021 | 0.000 |
1017 | 0.124a | 0.267b | −0.162–0.124 | 0.000 |
1027 | 0.359a | 0.209b | 0.114–0.185 | 0.000 |
1050 | 0.047a | 0.253b | −0.232–0.18 | 0.000 |
Uptake values with different letters are significantly different at the 5% level and are to be compared within samples.
CI = confidence interval.
Sample number . | Mean uptake earlywood . | Mean uptake latewood . | 95% CI for mean difference . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1002 | 0.097a | 0.047b | 0.045–0.055 | 0.000 |
1004 | 0.068a | 0.056a | −0.01–0.024 | 0.066 |
1005 | 0.068a | 0.036b | 0.028–0.035 | 0.000 |
1006 | 0.217a | 0.204a | 0.0–0.027 | 0.056 |
1008 | 0.037a | 0.022b | 0.01–0.021 | 0.000 |
1012 | 0.055a | 0.039b | 0.011–0.021 | 0.000 |
1017 | 0.124a | 0.267b | −0.162–0.124 | 0.000 |
1027 | 0.359a | 0.209b | 0.114–0.185 | 0.000 |
1050 | 0.047a | 0.253b | −0.232–0.18 | 0.000 |
Sample number . | Mean uptake earlywood . | Mean uptake latewood . | 95% CI for mean difference . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1002 | 0.097a | 0.047b | 0.045–0.055 | 0.000 |
1004 | 0.068a | 0.056a | −0.01–0.024 | 0.066 |
1005 | 0.068a | 0.036b | 0.028–0.035 | 0.000 |
1006 | 0.217a | 0.204a | 0.0–0.027 | 0.056 |
1008 | 0.037a | 0.022b | 0.01–0.021 | 0.000 |
1012 | 0.055a | 0.039b | 0.011–0.021 | 0.000 |
1017 | 0.124a | 0.267b | −0.162–0.124 | 0.000 |
1027 | 0.359a | 0.209b | 0.114–0.185 | 0.000 |
1050 | 0.047a | 0.253b | −0.232–0.18 | 0.000 |
Uptake values with different letters are significantly different at the 5% level and are to be compared within samples.
CI = confidence interval.
Water-filled porosity and oil uptake
Generally there was a clear positive correlation between water-filled porosity and oil uptake in sapwood samples (Figures 4 and 5), especially in the sapwood samples of batches 4 and 5 that were impregnated using the high uptake rate protocol and used to analyse differences in uptake associated with vertical position, suggesting that process settings and water-filled porosity had interactive effects on the uptake pattern.
The X-ray microdensitometry analysis also indicated that increases in the percentage of water-filled porosity increased oil uptake in both earlywood and latewood, especially the former (Figure 5).
SEM analysis of oil uptake
In samples with high uptake, both earlywood and latewood were filled with oil to a large degree (Figure 6a) in almost all parts of the examined specimens (3). Latewood cells were always filled with oil, but earlywood cells in some small areas were not completely filled. There were no obvious patterns in the oil distribution associated with rays or damage to cell walls that could explain these small areas of empty earlywood cells.
In samples with low uptake (Figure 6b and c), earlywood cells were filled to varying degrees in some parts of the examined specimens, and not at all in others (3), while latewood cells were always filled to a high degree. In some areas the oil seemed to stop after the last latewood cell in an annual ring, i.e. between two rings (Figure 6d).
Discussion
The study showed that it is possible to successfully treat entire samples of Norway spruce wood with the hydrophobic linseed oil. Secondly, the amount of oil taken up during impregnation by both protocols, calculated as a percentage of the wood's dry weight ranged from 30 to 50 per cent in sapwood/mature wood and from 10 to 20 per cent in heartwood/juvenile and heartwood/mature wood. The earlywood and latewood within mature sapwood behaved significantly differently with respect to oil uptake during impregnation in 78 per cent of samples at the 5 per cent probability level. The oil uptake was higher, on average, in earlywood than in latewood. No significant differences in average uptake between the two protocols were found, which probably means that the properties of the raw material affect the impregnation results more than the actual process parameters.
The oil distribution after treatment at different vertical locations in samples differed between tissue types. In heartwood samples, no significant differences in oil distribution were detected, whereas in sapwood samples the uptake in the middle of the samples was significantly lower than in the end parts. Nevertheless, uptake in the middle of sapwood samples was still higher than for heartwood. Oil may use different flow paths in different tissue types due to anatomical differences (cf. Hansmann et al., 2002). That sapwood samples and heartwood samples were not taken from the same trees and probably had little or no effect on the results.
The densitometry values obtained from the Woodtrax analyses of extracted wood are similar but somewhat lower than those found in other studies (Mäkinen et al., 2002), so the calculated oil uptake in samples are unlikely to be overestimates. In addition, other studies have generally concluded that earlywood should be easier to penetrate than latewood (Keith and Chauret, 1988; Olsson et al., 2001). Moreover, Olesen (1977) reports that for water-based preservative treatment there is a negative correlation between uptake and basic density in Norway spruce. However, this pattern was not found for any of the wood types in the present study. Keith and Chauret (1988) report examples of exceptional tangential movement of an impregnant in latewood bands from white spruce (Picea glauca L.). Similar movements probably occurred in some specimens in the present study, as exemplified in Figure 6c and d. When forcing a liquid into the porous structure of wood, the liquid follows the path of least resistance. This implies that it was easier to penetrate latewood tangentially than earlywood radially in some samples in this study. Studies of Norway spruce and radiata pine (Pinus radiata L.) have concluded that below the fibre saturation point earlywood tracheids tend to have far higher proportions of aspirated pits than latewood tracheids (Wardrop and Davies, 1961; Olesen, 1977). This may also have an effect on the oil dispersion within latewood.
SEM analyses of specimens from samples with high uptake confirmed the trends for oil uptake to be high in earlywood with high moisture content and high water-filled porosity. Specimens from these samples only had small areas of unfilled cells in earlywood, while latewood cells were always filled. There were no clear correlations between the distribution of the oil in earlywood cells and examined variables that could account for the small areas of unfilled earlywood cells. The sample examined because of its higher uptake in latewood than in earlywood and lower total uptake showed different tendencies. Earlywood cells in this sample were mostly not filled with oil, and no clear pattern in the oil distribution within earlywood was detected, except that there was a zone of completely filled cells (earlywood and latewood) at and near the outer surface of the sample. Within all specimens, latewood cells were always filled to a high degree. The oil seemed to have stopped at the border between latewood and earlywood, i.e. at the end of the annual ring, for reasons that were not apparent in the analyses. However, this is consistent with reports that the parenchymatic cell dividing the ray tracheids between year rings in Norway spruce often stops water-based impregnants (Baines and Saur, 1985).
For water-based impregnants, moisture content has no effect on the uptake in Norway spruce wood (Olesen, 1977). However, our study showed that a high moisture content before impregnation seems to enhance oil uptake. According to Gindl et al. (2003) a high cell wall moisture content also promotes impregnation of softwood cell walls with melamine–formaldehyde resin. In terms of the amount of linseed oil taken up as a proportion of the total potential uptake, the positive effect of moisture content was especially marked in earlywood. A possible explanation for this increased uptake is that some kind of damage in the wood structure caused by the impregnation process may occur above this range of moisture content. Another possibility is that low moisture content may be associated with relatively high amounts of air that may be trapped in the cells and block the oil's flow path (Olsson et al., 2001). For latewood, no clear tendencies in the effect of moisture content were found.
When examining sapwood samples, there was a clear positive correlation between the percentage of water-filled porosity in the wood and oil uptake. However, the positive effect was more pronounced in batches subjected to the higher uptake protocol than in batches subjected to the standard protocol, and the effect was clearer in earlywood than in latewood. In all calculations based on X-ray microdensitometry data, it was assumed that the wood was completely dry, which in reality it was not. Oil uptake values in relation to percentage of water-filled porosity in wood were thus slightly underestimated. In addition, in some samples latewood with low water-filled porosity was easier to penetrate than samples with slightly higher water-filled porosity. This high oil uptake might be explained by low water-filled porosity in combination with low degrees of pit aspiration in the latewood. Another possible factor is that parts of the latewood in some samples may be mechanically weaker, and thus the pressure during the impregnation process could create new flow paths. The indications that water-filled porosity had a less clear effect in batches subjected to the low uptake protocol implies that further research on the effect of process parameters is needed. Water and oil do not normally mix (Stier, 2005). However, the results indicate that an oil-in-water emulsion may develop within the porous area within the wood. If so, the oil seems to penetrate the wood better as a component of an oil-in-water emulsion than as pure oil. According to a previous experiment (unpublished), water readily mixes in the linseed oil derivative used in this study up to water : oil proportions of 1 : 7 at 100°C. The clear positive effect of water-filled porosity and the lack of an obvious pattern in oil dispersion associated with rays or structural damage support the suggested hypothesis. It is also possible that compounds extracted from the wood may act as emulsifiers. Stier (2005) defines emulsifiers as surface-active compounds that promote the formation of emulsions of water and fatty or oily compounds. Emulsifiers can have different structures (Anthemidis et al., 2005; Stier, 2005) and if extracted wood compounds have the ability to function effectively at low concentrations, it is quite possible that they may play an important role in the formation of emulsions.
The clear effect of percentage of water-filled porosity on the oil uptake in both earlywood and latewood in mature sapwood from Norway spruce is an interesting observation that may provide a basis for further research aiming (1) to develop a classification system for oil-based impregnation processes; (2) to facilitate the production of designed products with known material properties; (3) to elucidate ways to identify raw materials that are suitable for oil-based impregnation processes; and (4) to develop silvicultural measures that produce raw materials suitable for oil-based impregnation processes.
The authors wish to express their thanks to the staff of SLU Vindeln Experimental Forests in Vindeln for their help in sample preparation, the Kempe Foundation for financial support, Linotech industries for help with the impregnation and Mr Samuel Roturier for valuable help with sample preparation and measurements on heartwood samples.
References
Anthemidis, A.N., Arvanitidis, V. and Stratis, J.A.
Bailey, P.J. and Preston, R.D.
Baines, E.F. and Saur, J.M.
Banks, W.B.
Bolton, A.J.
Boutelje, J.
Bramhall, G.
Eckeveld, A. van, Homan, W.J. and Militz, H.
EN 350-2
EN 384
Gindl, W., Zargar, Y. and Wimmer, R.
Hägglund, B. and Lundmark, J.-E.
Hansmann, C., Gindl, W., Wimmer, R. and Teischinger, A.
Humar, M., Bokan, M., Amartey, S.A., Sentjurc, M., Kalan, P. and Pohleven, F.
Keith, C.T. and Chauret, G.
Lalman, J. and Bagley, D.
Liese, W. and Bauch, J.
Mäkinen, H., Saranpää, P. and Linder, S.
Megnis, M., Olsson, T., Varna, J. and Lindberg, H.
Nyrén, V. and Back, E.
Olesen, P.O.
Olsson, T., Megnis, M., Varna, J. and Lindberg, H.
Schneider, M.H.
Vinden, P.