Covalency Effects in KNiF3. III. Theoretical Studies

S. Sugano and R. G. Shulman
Phys. Rev. 130, 517 – Published 15 April 1963
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

For the (NiF6)4 complex in KNiF3 we have constructed molecular orbitals (MO) which are linear combinations of the Ni2+ and F Hartree-Fock atomic orbitals. These LCAO-MO, introduced by Van Vleck, are of the form Ψ=N12(ϕλχ) in which ϕ is the Ni2+ 3d function and χ a linear combination of the suitable F functions. The orbitals were assumed to be solutions of Schrödinger's equation hΨ=EΨ, where the Hamiltonian was h=Δ2+VM+VL. The terms VM and VL describe the Coulombic and exchange interactions with the metal ion and ligands, respectively. Matrix elements of the form Ψ|h|Ψ were evaluated numerically on an IBM 7090. Assuming λ and the overlap between ϕ and χ to be small, the energy was minimized and the parameters λ were determined. For the 2pσ bonding and the 2s bonding the calculated values were Ne12λσ=0.383 and Ne12λs=0.109 which agreed very well with the values Ne12λpσ=0.337 and Ne12λs=0.116 determined in the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment. The molecular orbitals were used to calculate the cubic crystal field splitting 10Dq=(Ψe|h|Ψe)(Ψt|h|Ψt) which is the promotion energy of an electron from a t2g orbital to an eg orbital. The calculated value of 10Dq=6350 cm1 agreed quite well with the observed value of 10Dq=7250 cm1 considering the accuracy of the calculation. Furthermore, the reduction of the spin-orbit parameter and the Racah parameter B from their free-ion values are satisfactorily explained by the molecular orbital approach. The physical interpretation of these results is emphasized. In particular, the only contributions to 10Dq with the correct sign come from the off-diagonal matrix elements associated with the covalency; the amount of π electron admixture is shown to be large; one novel physical mechanism partly responsible for the large π bonding is the crystal field splitting of the F pσ and pπ levels by the Ni2+ ions; expanding the Ni2+ radial function is shown to be unnecessary for some purposes and incorrect for the remainder. Details of the calculation are presented and implications of the LCAO-MO model discussed.

  • Received 14 December 1962

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.130.517

©1963 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

S. Sugano

  • The Institute for Solid State Physics, Tokyo University, Azabu, Tokyo, Japan and Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey

R. G. Shulman

  • Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Cambridge University, Cambridge, England and Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 130, Iss. 2 — April 1963

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Journals Archive

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×