Abstract
The quest for a Ni-based oxide analog to cuprate superconductors was long known to require a reduced form of as in , being an extremely oxygen-poor form of the usual compound. Through chemical reduction of a parent perovskite form, superconductivity was recently achieved in Sr-doped on a substrate. Using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we find that stoichiometric is significantly unstable with respect to decomposition into with exothermic decomposition energy of +176 meV/atom, a considerably higher instability than that for common ternary oxides. This poses the question of whether the stoichiometric nickelate compound used extensively to model the electronic band structure of the Ni-based oxide analog to cuprates, and found to be metallic, is the right model for this purpose. To examine this, we study via DFT the role of the common H impurity expected to be present in the process of chemical reduction needed to obtain . We find that H can be incorporated exothermically, i.e., spontaneously in , even from gas. In the concentrated limit, such impurities can result in the formation of a hydride compound, , which has significantly reduced instability relative to hydrogen-free (decomposition energy of +80 meV/atom instead of +176 meV/atom). Interestingly, the hydrogenated form has lattice constants similar to those of the pure form (leading to comparable x-ray diffraction patterns), but unlike the metallic character of , the hydrogenated form is predicted to be a wide gap insulator, thus requiring doping to create a metallic or superconducting state, just like cuprates, but unlike unhydrogenated nickelates. While it is possible that hydrogen would be eventually desorbed, the calculation suggests that pristine is hydrogen stabilized. One must exercise caution with theories predicting new physics in pristine stoichiometric as it might be an unrealizable compound. Experimental examination of the composition of real superconductors and the effect of hydrogen on the superconductivity is called for.
- Received 5 July 2021
- Accepted 9 November 2021
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.014106
©2022 American Physical Society