Experiments and simulations of the humidity dependence of friction between nanoasperities and graphite: The role of interfacial contact quality

Kathryn Hasz, Zhijiang Ye, Ashlie Martini, and Robert W. Carpick
Phys. Rev. Materials 2, 126001 – Published 7 December 2018
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We use atomic force microscopy and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations to study stick-slip friction of tetrahedral amorphous carbon probes sliding against highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) at relative humidities ranging from <1% to near saturation. Friction varies with humidity in a nonmonotonic manner such that water acts as a lubricant only above a threshold humidity; below that threshold, water increases friction substantially relative to dry sliding. Adhesion forces also show a similar nonmonotonic behavior. A nonmonotonic dependence of friction and adhesion on humidity for single-asperity interfaces has previously been attributed to the humidity-dependent adhesion force due to the water meniscus that forms at the contact, which is presumed to increase the solid-solid contact area. However, our simulations show no such increase in solid-solid contact area, but do show a small, continuous increase in tip-sample separation as humidity increases. Experimentally, no significant change in lateral stiffness is observed with humidity. All of this contradicts the hypothesis that the friction increase is due solely to capillary adhesion increasing the contact area. We show that water molecules are present between the tip and sample in increasing numbers as the humidity increases. From this, we attribute the nonmonotonic friction trend to the changing quality of the contact between the water and the substrate, quantified by the number of water molecules in the interface and their registry with the HOPG surface atoms, which in simulations also shows a nonmonotonic trend with humidity. Hysteresis observed in the variation of friction with humidity in both experiments and simulations is explained by the larger energy barrier for surface desorption of water molecules compared to adsorption.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 5 September 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.126001

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Research Areas
  1. Physical Systems
Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Kathryn Hasz1, Zhijiang Ye2, Ashlie Martini3, and Robert W. Carpick4,*

  • 1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 3231 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
  • 2Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Miami University, 650 E. High Street, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA
  • 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, California 95343, USA
  • 4Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, 220 S. 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA

  • *carpick@seas.upenn.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 2, Iss. 12 — December 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×