Diffusionless isothermal omega transformation in titanium alloys driven by quenched-in compositional fluctuations

Masakazu Tane, Hiroki Nishiyama, Akihiro Umeda, Norihiko L. Okamoto, Koji Inoue, Martin Luckabauer, Yasuyoshi Nagai, Tohru Sekino, Takayoshi Nakano, and Tetsu Ichitsubo
Phys. Rev. Materials 3, 043604 – Published 16 April 2019
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

In titanium alloys, the ω(hexagonal)-phase transformation has been categorized as either a diffusion-mediated isothermal transformation or an athermal transformation that occurs spontaneously via a diffusionless mechanism. Here we report a diffusionless isothermal ω transformation that can occur even above the ω transformation temperature. In body-centered cubic β-titanium alloyed with β-stabilizing elements, there are locally unstable regions having fewer β-stabilizing elements owing to quenched-in compositional fluctuations that are inevitably present in thermal equilibrium. In these locally unstable regions, diffusionless isothermal ω transformation occurs even when the entire β region is stable on average so that athermal ω transformation cannot occur. This anomalous, localized transformation originates from the fluctuation-driven localized softening of 2/3[111]β longitudinal phonon, which cannot be suppressed by the stabilization of β phase on average. In the diffusionless isothermal and athermal ω transformations, the transformation rate is dominated by two activation processes: a dynamical collapse of {111}β pairs, caused by the phonon softening, and a nucleation process. In the diffusionless isothermal transformation, the ω-phase nucleation, resulting from the localized phonon softening, requires relatively high activation energy owing to the coherent β/ω interface. Thus, the transformation occurs at slower rates than the athermal transformation, which occurs by the widely spread phonon softening. Consequently, the nucleation probability reflecting the β/ω interface energy is the rate-determining process in the diffusionless ω transformations.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 22 January 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.043604

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Masakazu Tane1,2,*, Hiroki Nishiyama1, Akihiro Umeda1, Norihiko L. Okamoto2, Koji Inoue2, Martin Luckabauer2, Yasuyoshi Nagai2, Tohru Sekino1, Takayoshi Nakano3, and Tetsu Ichitsubo2

  • 1Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan
  • 2Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
  • 3Division of Materials and Manufacturing Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

  • *mtane@sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 3, Iss. 4 — April 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×