Optimal pulse spacing for dynamical decoupling in the presence of a purely dephasing spin bath

Ashok Ajoy, Gonzalo A. Álvarez, and Dieter Suter
Phys. Rev. A 83, 032303 – Published 8 March 2011

Abstract

Maintaining quantum coherence is a crucial requirement for quantum computation; hence protecting quantum systems against their irreversible corruption due to environmental noise is an important open problem. Dynamical decoupling (DD) is an effective method for reducing decoherence with a low control overhead. It also plays an important role in quantum metrology, where, for instance, it is employed in multiparameter estimation. While a sequence of equidistant control pulses [the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence] has been ubiquitously used for decoupling, Uhrig recently proposed that a nonequidistant pulse sequence [the Uhrig dynamic decoupling (UDD) sequence] may enhance DD performance, especially for systems where the spectral density of the environment has a sharp frequency cutoff. On the other hand, equidistant sequences outperform UDD for soft cutoffs. The relative advantage provided by UDD for intermediate regimes is not clear. In this paper, we analyze the relative DD performance in this regime experimentally, using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. Our system qubits are C13 nuclear spins and the environment consists of a H1 nuclear spin bath whose spectral density is close to a normal (Gaussian) distribution. We find that in the presence of such a bath, the CPMG sequence outperforms the UDD sequence. An analogy between dynamical decoupling and interference effects in optics provides an intuitive explanation as to why the CPMG sequence performs better than any nonequidistant DD sequence in the presence of this kind of environmental noise.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
9 More
  • Received 29 November 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.032303

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Ashok Ajoy1,2,3,*, Gonzalo A. Álvarez1,†, and Dieter Suter1,‡

  • 1Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany
  • 2Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Zuarinagar, Goa 403726, India
  • 3NMR Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India

  • *ashok.ajoy@gmail.com
  • galvarez@e3.physik.uni-dortmund.de
  • Dieter.Suter@tu-dortmund.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 83, Iss. 3 — March 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×