Nitrogen adsorption on carbon nanotube bundles:  Role of the external surface

Jianwen Jiang and Stanley I. Sandler
Phys. Rev. B 68, 245412 – Published 12 December 2003
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Nitrogen adsorption on two types of single-walled carbon nanotube bundles at both subcritical and supercritical temperatures is studied using Gibbs ensemble Monte Carlo simulation to understand the role of the external surface in the type of isotherm. On an infinite periodic hexagonal bundle without an external surface, which was mostly used in previous theoretical studies, subcritical adsorption is of type I with two steps in the adsorption isotherm and two maxima in the isosteric heat corresponding to adsorption, first forming annuli inside the nanotubes, and then with increased coverage at the centers of the nanotubes. Supercritical adsorption is also of type I, but with one step in the adsorption isotherm and a single maximum in the isosteric heat. Also, at high pressures the interstitial channels between the nanotubes become accessible to nitrogen molecules. On a small isolated hexagonal bundle with an external surface, subcritical adsorption is of type II, as has been observed in experiments, with two steps in the adsorption isotherm and two maxima in the isosteric heat. The first step corresponds to adsorption at the internal annuli and the grooves between the nanotubes, and the second step results from adsorption at the ridges on the external surface of the bundle and at the centers of the nanotubes. At higher coverages multilayer adsorption and wetting occur on the external surface as the bulk phase approaches saturation. Supercritical adsorption is of type I, without a step in the adsorption isotherm or a maximum in the isosteric heat, and there is no nitrogen adsorption in the interstitial channels even at high pressures. These results demonstrate the important role of the external surface of the nanotube bundle in the character of adsorption isotherm, and provide a substantial physical explanation for the difference between experimental observation and previous theoretical prediction.

  • Received 6 July 2003

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.245412

©2003 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Jianwen Jiang* and Stanley I. Sandler

  • Center for Molecular and Engineering Thermodynamics, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA

  • *Corresponding author. Electronic address: jiangj@che.udel.edu

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 68, Iss. 24 — 15 December 2003

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×