Effective anisotropies and energy barriers of magnetic nanoparticles with Néel surface anisotropy

R. Yanes, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, H. Kachkachi, D. A. Garanin, R. Evans, and R. W. Chantrell
Phys. Rev. B 76, 064416 – Published 14 August 2007

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles with Néel surface anisotropy, different internal structures, surface arrangements, and elongation are modeled as many-spin systems. The results suggest that the energy of many-spin nanoparticles cut from cubic lattices can be represented by an effective one-spin potential containing uniaxial and cubic anisotropies. It is shown that the values and signs of the corresponding constants depend strongly on the particle’s surface arrangement, internal structure, and shape. Particles cut from a simple cubic lattice have the opposite sign of the effective cubic term, as compared to particles cut from the face-centered cubic lattice. Furthermore, other remarkable phenomena are observed in nanoparticles with relatively strong surface effects. (i) In elongated particles surface effects can change the sign of the uniaxial anisotropy. (ii) In symmetric particles (spherical and truncated octahedral) with cubic core anisotropy surface effects can change the sing of the latter. We also show that the competition between the core and surface anisotropies leads to a new energy that contributes to both the second- and fourth-order effective anisotropies. We evaluate energy barriers ΔE as functions of the strength of the surface anisotropy and the particle size. The results are analyzed with the help of the effective one-spin potential, which allows us to assess the consistency of the widely used formula ΔEV=K+6KsD, where K is the core anisotropy constant, Ks is a phenomenological constant related to surface anisotropy, and D is the particle’s diameter. We show that the energy barriers are consistent with this formula only for elongated particles for which the surface contribution to the effective uniaxial anisotropy scales with the surface and is linear in the constant of the Néel surface anisotropy.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
12 More
  • Received 26 April 2007

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.064416

©2007 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

R. Yanes and O. Chubykalo-Fesenko

  • Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, CSIC, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain

H. Kachkachi

  • Groupe d’Etude de la Matière Condensée, Université de Versailles St. Quentin, CNRS UMR8635, 45 avenue des Etats-Unis, 78035 Versailles, France

D. A. Garanin

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Lehman College, City University of New York, 250 Bedford Park Boulevard West, Bronx, New York 10468-1589, U.S.A

R. Evans and R. W. Chantrell

  • Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 76, Iss. 6 — 1 August 2007

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×