Ferromagnetic nanoparticles with strong surface anisotropy: Spin structures and magnetization processes

L. Berger, Y. Labaye, M. Tamine, and J. M. D. Coey
Phys. Rev. B 77, 104431 – Published 24 March 2008

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulations are used to investigate the effect of surface anisotropy on the spin configurations and hysteresis loops of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Spherical particles of radius ρa are composed of N atoms located on a simple cubic lattice with interatomic spacing a. The particles have 2ρ13. A classical Heisenberg model is assumed, with surface and bulk anisotropy. When surface anisotropy is positive there are two types of ground states separated by a large energy barrier: a “throttled” configuration with reduced magnetization for intermediate values of surface anisotropy and a “hedgehog” configuration with zero magnetization in the strong surface anisotropy limit. Beyond a threshold, surface anisotropy of either sign induces ⟨111⟩ easy axes for the net magnetization. Easy-axis hysteresis loops are then square, with a continuous approach to saturation, and the effective anisotropy is deduced either from the switching field or from the initial slope of the perpendicular magnetization curve. The hedgehog state shows a stepwise magnetization curve involving ρ discrete configurations, and it passes to a throttled configuration before saturating. The hysteresis loop has the unusual feature that it involves a state in the first quadrant, which lies on the reversible initial magnetization curve; it is possible to recover the zero-field cooled state after saturation. A survey of the exchange and anisotropy parameters for a range of ferromagnetic materials indicates that the effects of surface anisotropy on the spin configuration should be most evident in nanoparticles of ferromagnetic actinide compounds such as US, and rare-earth metals and alloys with Curie points below room temperature; the effects in nanoparticles of 3d ferromagnets and their alloys are usually insignificant, with the possible exception of FePt.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
8 More
  • Received 7 November 2007

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.104431

©2008 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

L. Berger, Y. Labaye, and M. Tamine

  • Laboratoire de Physique de l’Etat Condensé, CNRS UMR 6087, Université du Maine, 72085 Le Mans, Cedex 9, France

J. M. D. Coey

  • School of Physics and CRANN, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 77, Iss. 10 — 1 March 2008

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×