Surface and grain-boundary scattering in nanometric Cu films

Tik Sun, Bo Yao, Andrew P. Warren, Katayun Barmak, Michael F. Toney, Robert E. Peale, and Kevin R. Coffey
Phys. Rev. B 81, 155454 – Published 28 April 2010

Abstract

We report a quantitative analysis of both surface and grain-boundary scattering in Cu thin films with independent variation in film thickness (27 to 158 nm) and grain size (35 to 425 nm) in samples prepared by subambient temperature film deposition followed by annealing. Film resistivities of carefully characterized samples were measured at both room temperature and at 4.2 K and were compared with physical models that include the effects of surface and grain-boundary scattering. Grain-boundary scattering is found to provide the strongest contribution to the resistivity increase. However, a weaker, but significant, role is observed for surface scattering. We find that the data are best fit when the Mayadas and Shatzkes’ model of grain-boundary scattering and the Fuchs and Sondheimer’s model of surface scattering resistivity contributions are combined using Matthiessen’s rule (simple addition of resistivities). This finding implies that grain-boundary scattering preserves the component of electron momentum parallel to the grain-boundary plane. Using Matthiessen’s rule, we find our data are well described by a grain-boundary reflection coefficient of 0.43 and a surface specularity coefficient of 0.52. This analysis finds a significantly lower contribution from surface scattering than has been reported in previous works and we attribute this difference to the careful quantitative microstructural characterization performed on our samples. The effects of surface roughness, impurities, voids, and interactions between surface and grain-boundary scattering are also examined and their importance is evaluated.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 10 September 2009

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.155454

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Tik Sun1, Bo Yao1, Andrew P. Warren1, Katayun Barmak2, Michael F. Toney3, Robert E. Peale4, and Kevin R. Coffey1,4

  • 1Advanced Materials Processing and Analysis Center, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32816, USA
  • 2Materials Research Science and Engineering Center and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
  • 3Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
  • 4Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32816, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 81, Iss. 15 — 15 April 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×