Determination of layer-resolved composition, magnetization, and electronic structure of an Fe/MgO tunnel junction by standing-wave core and valence photoemission

See-Hun Yang, Benjamin Balke, Christian Papp, Sven Döring, Ulf Berges, L. Plucinski, Carsten Westphal, Claus M. Schneider, Stuart S. P. Parkin, and Charles S. Fadley
Phys. Rev. B 84, 184410 – Published 11 November 2011

Abstract

Spin-dependent tunneling across a highly textured MgO insulating barrier has received much attention due to its potential applications in various spintronic devices. However, the interfacial magnetic and electronic structure of a prototypical realization of this in Fe/MgO/Fe and the effective band gap of the MgO layer are still under debate. In order to resolve these issues, we have employed standing-wave excited core and valence photoemission, as well as core-level magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) in photoemission, to study the Fe/MgO interface with subnanometer depth resolution. For our synthetic procedure, we show that the Fe/MgO interface is linearly intermixed in composition over a length of ∼8 Å (∼4 monolayers) and that there is a magnetic dead layer ∼2–3 Å thick. The unambiguous extraction of depth-resolved density of states (DOS) reveals that the interfacial layer composition is mostly metallic and nonmagnetic FeOx, with x ≅ 1, which accounts for a smaller magnetoresistance compared to theoretical predictions. The formation of the magnetic dead layer (FeO) at the interface should also reduce the tunneling spin polarization. The analysis of our data also shows a clear valence band edge of ultrathin MgO layer at ∼3.5 eV below the Fermi level (EF) that is very close to that of single crystal bulk MgO. An analysis that does not consider the interdiffused region separately exhibits the valence band edge for MgO layer ∼1.3 eV below EF, which is significantly closer to the MgO barrier height estimated from magnetotransport measurements and further suggests that the Fe/MgO interdiffusion effectively reduces the MgO band gap.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 1 June 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.184410

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

See-Hun Yang1,*, Benjamin Balke2,3,†, Christian Papp2,3,‡, Sven Döring4, Ulf Berges4, L. Plucinski5, Carsten Westphal4, Claus M. Schneider5, Stuart S. P. Parkin1, and Charles S. Fadley2,3,§

  • 1IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California 95120, USA
  • 2Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA
  • 4Experimentelle Physik 1-Technische Universität Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 4, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany
  • 5Peter Grünberg Institut, PGI-6, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany

  • *Corresponding author: seeyang@us.ibm.com
  • Present address: Institut für Anorganische und Analytische Chemie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, 55099 Mainz, Germany.
  • Present address: Lehrstuhl für Physikalische Chemie II, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstr. 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany.
  • §chuckfadley@gmail.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 84, Iss. 18 — 1 November 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×