Growth and electronic structure of boron-doped graphene

J. Gebhardt, R. J. Koch, W. Zhao, O. Höfert, K. Gotterbarm, S. Mammadov, C. Papp, A. Görling, H.-P. Steinrück, and Th. Seyller
Phys. Rev. B 87, 155437 – Published 29 April 2013
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

The doping of graphene to tune its electronic properties is essential for its further use in carbon-based electronics. Adapting strategies from classical silicon-based semiconductor technology, we use the incorporation of heteroatoms in the 2D graphene network as a straightforward way to achieve this goal. Here, we report on the synthesis of boron-doped graphene on Ni(111) in a chemical vapor deposition process of triethylborane on the one hand and by segregation of boron from the bulk of the substrate crystal on the other hand. The chemical environment of boron was determined by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy was used to analyze the impact on the band structure. Doping with boron leads to a shift of the graphene bands to lower binding energies. The shift depends on the doping concentration and for a doping level of 0.3 ML a shift of up to 1.2 eV is observed. The experimental results are in agreement with density-functional calculations. Furthermore, our calculations suggest that doping with boron leads to graphene preferentially adsorbed in the top-fcc geometry, since the boron atoms in the graphene lattice are then adsorbed at substrate fcc-hollow sites. The smaller distance of boron atoms incorporated into graphene compared to graphene carbon atoms leads to a bending of the doped graphene sheet in the vicinity of the boron atoms. By comparing calculations of doped and undoped graphene on Ni(111), as well as the respective freestanding cases, we are able to distinguish between the effects that doping and adsorption have on the band structure of graphene. Both doping and bonding to the surface result in opposing shifts on the graphene bands.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 2 December 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.155437

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. Gebhardt1,*, R. J. Koch2,*, W. Zhao3, O. Höfert3, K. Gotterbarm3, S. Mammadov2, C. Papp3,†, A. Görling1, H.-P. Steinrück3, and Th. Seyller4

  • 1Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Chemie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • 2Lehrstuhl für Technische Physik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • 3Lehrstuhl für Physikalische Chemie II, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • 4Institut für Physik, TU Chemnitz, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany

  • *These authors have contributed equally to this work.
  • christian.papp@chemie.uni-erlangen.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 15 — 15 April 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×