Impact of homogeneous strain on uranium vacancy diffusion in uranium dioxide

Anuj Goyal, Simon R. Phillpot, Gopinath Subramanian, David A. Andersson, Chris R. Stanek, and Blas P. Uberuaga
Phys. Rev. B 91, 094103 – Published 3 March 2015

Abstract

We present a detailed mechanism of, and the effect of homogeneous strains on, the migration of uranium vacancies in UO2. Vacancy migration pathways and barriers are identified using density functional theory and the effect of uniform strain fields are accounted for using the dipole tensor approach. We report complex migration pathways and noncubic symmetry associated with the uranium vacancy in UO2 and show that these complexities need to be carefully accounted for to predict the correct diffusion behavior of uranium vacancies. We show that under homogeneous strain fields, only the dipole tensor of the saddle with respect to the minimum is required to correctly predict the change in the energy barrier between the strained and the unstrained case. Diffusivities are computed using kinetic Monte Carlo simulations for both neutral and fully charged state of uranium single and divacancies. We calculate the effect of strain on migration barriers in the temperature range 800–1800 K for both vacancy types. Homogeneous strains as small as 2% have a considerable effect on diffusivity of both single and divacancies of uranium, with the effect of strain being more pronounced for single vacancies than divacancies. In contrast, the response of a given defect to strain is less sensitive to changes in the charge state of the defect. Further, strain leads to anisotropies in the mobility of the vacancy and the degree of anisotropy is very sensitive to the nature of the applied strain field for strain of equal magnitude. Our results suggest that the influence of strain on vacancy diffusivity will be significantly greater when single vacancies dominate the defect structure, such as sintering, while the effects will be much less substantial under irradiation conditions where divacancies dominate.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
9 More
  • Received 14 January 2015
  • Revised 13 February 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.094103

Published by the American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Anuj Goyal* and Simon R. Phillpot

  • Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA

Gopinath Subramanian

  • School of Polymers and High Performance Materials, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39402, USA

David A. Andersson, Chris R. Stanek, and Blas P. Uberuaga

  • Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA

  • *anuj.goyal@ufl.edu
  • blas@lanl.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 91, Iss. 9 — 1 March 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×