• Rapid Communication

Residual stress induced stabilization of martensite phase and its effect on the magnetostructural transition in Mn-rich Ni-Mn-In/Ga magnetic shape-memory alloys

Sanjay Singh, Pallavi Kushwaha, F. Scheibel, Hanns-Peter Liermann, S. R. Barman, M. Acet, C. Felser, and Dhananjai Pandey
Phys. Rev. B 92, 020105(R) – Published 22 July 2015
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

The irreversibility of the martensite transition in magnetic shape memory alloys (MSMAs) with respect to the external magnetic field is one of the biggest challenges that limits their application as giant caloric materials. This transition is a magnetostructural transition that is accompanied with a steep drop in magnetization (i.e.,ΔM) around the martensite start temperature (Ms) due to the lower magnetization of the martensite phase. In this Rapid Communication, we show that ΔM around Ms in Mn-rich Ni-Mn-based MSMAs gets suppressed by two orders of magnitude in crushed powders due to the stabilization of the martensite phase at temperatures well above Ms and the austenite finish (Af) temperatures due to residual stresses. Analysis of the intensities and the FWHM of the x-ray powder-diffraction patterns reveals stabilized martensite phase fractions as 97%, 75%, and 90% with corresponding residual microstrains as 5.4%, 5.6%, and 3% in crushed powders of the three different Mn-rich Ni-Mn alloys, namely, Mn1.8Ni1.8In0.4, Mn1.75Ni1.25Ga, and Mn1.9Ni1.1Ga, respectively. Even after annealing at 773 K, the residual stress stabilized martensite phase does not fully revert to the equilibrium cubic austenite phase as the magnetostructural transition is only partially restored with a reduced value of ΔM. Our results have a very significant bearing on the application of such alloys as inverse magnetocaloric and barocaloric materials.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 1 June 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.020105

©2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Sanjay Singh1,2, Pallavi Kushwaha2, F. Scheibel1, Hanns-Peter Liermann3, S. R. Barman4, M. Acet1, C. Felser2, and Dhananjai Pandey5

  • 1Experimentalphysik, University Duisburg-Essen, D-47048 Duisburg, Germany
  • 2Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Nöthnitzer Strasse 40, 01187 Dresden, Germany
  • 3Photon Sciences, FS-PE, Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY), 22607 Hamburg, Germany
  • 4UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research, Khandwa Road, Indore, 452001 Madhya Pradesh, India
  • 5School of Materials Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi-221005, India

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 92, Iss. 2 — 1 July 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×