Magnetic structure of an incommensurate phase of La-doped BiFe0.5Sc0.5O3: Role of antisymmetric exchange interactions

D. D. Khalyavin, A. N. Salak, A. B. Lopes, N. M. Olekhnovich, A. V. Pushkarev, Yu. V. Radyush, E. L. Fertman, V. A. Desnenko, A. V. Fedorchenko, P. Manuel, A. Feher, J. M. Vieira, and M. G. S. Ferreira
Phys. Rev. B 92, 224428 – Published 23 December 2015

Abstract

A 20% substitution of Bi with La in the perovskite Bi1xLaxFe0.5Sc0.5O3 system obtained under high-pressure and high-temperature conditions has been found to induce an incommensurately modulated structural phase. The room-temperature x-ray and neutron powder diffraction patterns of this phase were successfully refined using the Imma(0,0,γ)s00 superspace group (γ=0.534(3)) with the modulation applied to Bi/La and oxygen displacements. The modulated structure is closely related to the prototype antiferroelectric structure of PbZrO3 which can be considered as the lock-in variant of the latter with γ=0.5. Below TN220 K, the neutron diffraction data provide evidence for a long-range G-type antiferromagnetic ordering commensurate with the average Imma structure. Based on a general symmetry consideration, we show that the direction of the spins is controlled by the antisymmetric exchange imposed by the two primary structural distortions, namely oxygen octahedral tilting and incommensurate atomic displacements. The tilting is responsible for the onset of a weak ferromagnetism, observed in magnetization measurements, whereas the incommensurate displacive mode is dictated by the symmetry to couple a spin-density wave. The obtained results demonstrate that antisymmetric exchange is the dominant anisotropic interaction in Fe3+-based distorted perovskites with a nearly quenched orbital degree of freedom.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 8 April 2015
  • Revised 14 October 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.224428

©2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

D. D. Khalyavin1,*, A. N. Salak2,†, A. B. Lopes2, N. M. Olekhnovich3, A. V. Pushkarev3, Yu. V. Radyush3, E. L. Fertman4, V. A. Desnenko4, A. V. Fedorchenko4, P. Manuel1, A. Feher5, J. M. Vieira2, and M. G. S. Ferreira2

  • 1ISIS Facility, STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11-0QX, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering/CICECO, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
  • 3Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Science of Belarus, Minsk, 220072, Belarus
  • 4B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Kharkov, 61103, Ukraine
  • 5Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, 04154, Slovakia

  • *dmitry.khalyavin@stfc.ac.uk
  • salak@ua.pt

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 92, Iss. 22 — 1 December 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×