Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by E. Shchukin and W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230502 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 26 March 2006
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.058901
©2006 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by E. Shchukin and W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230502 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.058901
©2006 American Physical Society