To read this content please select one of the options below:

Optimization of non‐convex water resource problems by honey‐bee mating optimization (HBMO) algorithm

O. Bozorg Haddad (Department of Irrigation and Reclamation, Faculty of Soil and Water Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Tehran, Iran)
A. Afshar (Department of Civil Engineering & Center of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Mechanics, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran, and)
M.A. Mariño (Hydrology Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, California, USA)

Engineering Computations

ISSN: 0264-4401

Article publication date: 10 April 2009

603

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to present the honey‐bee mating optimization (HBMO) algorithm tested with, first, a well‐known, non‐linear, non‐separable, irregular, multi‐modal “Fletcher‐Powell” function; and second, with a single hydropower reservoir operation optimization problem, to demonstrate the efficiency of the algorithm in handling complex mathematical problems as well as non‐convex water resource management problems. HBMO and genetic algorithm (GA) are applied to the second problem and the results are compared with those of a gradient‐based method non‐linear programming (NLP).

Design/methodology/approach

The HBMO algorithm is a hybrid optimization algorithm comprised of three features: simulated annealing, GA, and local search. This algorithm uses the individual features of these approaches and combines them together, resulting in an enhanced performance of HBMO in finding near optimal solutions.

Findings

Results of the “Fletcher‐Powell” function show more accuracy and higher convergence speed when applying HBMO algorithm rather than GA. When solving the single hydropower reservoir operation optimization problem, by disregarding evaporation from the model structure, both NLP solver and HBMO resulted in approximately the same near‐optimal solutions. However, when evaporation was added to the model, the NLP solver failed to find a feasible solution, whereas the proposed HBMO algorithm resulted in a feasible, near‐optimal solution.

Originality/value

This paper shows that the HBMO algorithm is not complicated to use and does not require much mathematical sophistication to understand its mechanisms. A tool such as the HBMO algorithm can be considered as an optimization tool able to provide alternative solutions from which designers/decision makers may choose.

Keywords

Citation

Bozorg Haddad, O., Afshar, A. and Mariño, M.A. (2009), "Optimization of non‐convex water resource problems by honey‐bee mating optimization (HBMO) algorithm", Engineering Computations, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400910943617

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles