To read this content please select one of the options below:

HRM practice and employee attitudes: different measures – different results

Fiona Edgar (Department of Management, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand)
Alan Geare (Department of Management, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand)

Personnel Review

ISSN: 0048-3486

Article publication date: 1 October 2005

41149

Abstract

Purpose

To test the relationship between HRM practice and employee work‐related attitudes and examine whether different approaches to measurement of HRM gives different results.

Design/methodology/approach

HRM practice was measured in three ways: additive measures of numbers of HRM practice, employer reports and employee reports of strength of practices. Employee attitudes were measured using organisational commitment, job satisfaction and organisational fairness scales. Matched data sets tested the relationships.

Findings

Statistically significant results were obtained between HRM practice and employee attitudes, but only when employee reports of the strength of HRM practice were used to measure HRM.

Research limitations/implications

This study emphasises that care must be taken in HRM research to use suitable data sources, with employees being a valuable, but under‐used, source.

Practical implications

Effective HRM policies and practices should be measured by their perceived quality, not simply by the number of practices introduced.

Originality/value

This study highlights that there are perceptual differences as to the strength of HRM practices and emphasises the importance of allowing employee voice in HRM research.

Keywords

Citation

Edgar, F. and Geare, A. (2005), "HRM practice and employee attitudes: different measures – different results", Personnel Review, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 534-549. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480510612503

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles