To read this content please select one of the options below:

Corporate social responsibility in the 1920s: an institutional perspective

Richard C. Hoffman (Perdue School of Business, Salisbury University, Salisbury, Maryland, USA)

Journal of Management History

ISSN: 1751-1348

Article publication date: 16 January 2007

5949

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to better understand the origins of modern corporate social responsibility. The paper seeks to examine some factors that enabled the new industrial corporation to expand its role in society.

Design/methodology/approach

Using institutional theory, this paper describes how some of the institutional characteristics of the modern corporation itself provided some opportunities or challenges in terms of gaining social legitimacy.

Findings

The institutional features of the corporation, its technology and management created new demands on the corporation by society. These in turn led to the development of such concepts of corporate social responsibility as: public relations, service, trusteeship, and public welfare.

Research limitations/implications

Future research on social legitimacy should focus on demands placed by the institutional characteristics of new organizations. Other research might include comparative studies of corporate legitimacy in Europe or Asia or an examination of the evolving role of managers from the role of welfare capitalist to trusteeship.

Practical implications

Institutions that adapt to changing demands have the best chance to survive. Firms that adopt new social activities are likely to have to sustain them in the long run.

Originality/value

This study is the first to argue that the features of the modern corporation itself stimulated some of the social activities it undertook. Contributions of scientific management scholars to the shaping of the emerging corporate role are also noted.

Keywords

Citation

Hoffman, R.C. (2007), "Corporate social responsibility in the 1920s: an institutional perspective", Journal of Management History, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511340710715179

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles