To read this content please select one of the options below:

Consumers’ brand identity complexity: conceptualization and predictive ability

Ulrich R. Orth (Department of A&F Marketing – Customer Insights, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany and Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia)
Gregory M. Rose (Milgard School of Business, University of Washington, Tacoma, Washington, USA)

European Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0309-0566

Article publication date: 13 February 2017

2656

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to integrate Roccas and Brewer’s (2002) social identity complexity theory with the brand symbolism literature to propose a new construct: brand identity complexity (BIC). Different than previous conceptualizations of identity complexity which focus on the degree of internal differentiation of the personal self, BIC focuses on the degree of complexity in the social self and is defined as a consumer’s subjective representation and psychological state of belongingness to multiple identity-constructing brand ingroups. BIC impacts the adoption of new brands as they relate to the social self.

Design/methodology/approach

Three experiments were performed to test BIC’s predictive power. Study 1 measures BIC and tests its influence on the adoption of new brands positioned as unique. Study 2 manipulates BIC through priming and tests its influence on the adoption of new brands that appeal to independence. Study 3 also manipulates BIC and examines its influence on the adoption of brand extensions.

Findings

Study 1 demonstrates that high BIC consumers are more likely to adopt a new brand that appeals to a unique social self. Study 2 shows that high BIC individuals are more likely to adopt a new brand that appeals to an independent self. Study 3 shows that high BIC consumers are more likely to adopt a brand extension with a low fit to the parent category. All three studies offer evidence of the mediating role of identity-driven payoffs.

Research limitations/implications

The findings suggest that individuals perceive their multiple brand ingroups to be more or less complex. This outcome merges the social identity theory with consumer–brand relationship research and adds to an emerging stream of research that explores personal, situational and cultural differences in the social self and its relation to commercial offers.

Practical implications

Marketers can benefit from the findings by better understanding which brand appeals will be more effective with target consumers and under what conditions.

Originality/value

This research develops a conceptual framework for understanding the development of brand ingroup-based identity complexity.

Keywords

Citation

Orth, U.R. and Rose, G.M. (2017), "Consumers’ brand identity complexity: conceptualization and predictive ability", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 304-323. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2015-0446

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles