To read this content please select one of the options below:

Exploring management accountants’ role conflicts and ambiguities and how they cope with them

Seán Byrne (School of Business, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland)
Bernard Pierce (Business School, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland)

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

ISSN: 1176-6093

Article publication date: 18 October 2018

Issue publication date: 24 October 2018

2274

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to explore the nature of the expectations of operations managers (OMs) and the enacted roles of management accountants (MAs) and to understand how MAs construct roles around these expectations.

Design/methodology/approach

A qualitative design draws upon company documentation and 36 semi-structured interviews with MAs and OMs. The study uses role theory as a theoretical lens with its core concepts of role expectations, role conflict and role ambiguity. The design draws from role theory’s original development and testing to pair particular roles of MAs with particular roles of OMs in operational settings.

Findings

The findings indicate that there are a number of different forms of OMs’ expectations giving rise to role conflicts and role ambiguity for the roles of MAs. OMs’ expectations were identified as conflicting expectations, ambiguous expectations, overloaded expectations and underloaded expectations. MAs construct roles in different ways around these OMs’ expectations, including prioritising the line function, competence deployment, non-accommodation and communication. Factors moderating OMs’ expectations are also identified, including characteristics of the OM and the role of the finance manager.

Research limitations/implications

The study is based on an in-depth investigation of a small number of roles of MAs paired with OMs, and no assurances can therefore be given regarding generalisability of the findings.

Practical implications

The results provide an understanding of the varied nature of expectations that OMs have of MAs and mechanisms through which MAs can address these expectations. It suggests ways in which both MAs and OMs in operational settings can reduce conflicts and ambiguities.

Originality/value

This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the expectations of OMs in relation to the roles of MAs and contributes to the literature on the roles of MAs using role theory. It shows how different forms of OMs’ expectations have related mechanisms used by MAs to navigate these expectations through role constructions.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the very helpful contributions from the editor and reviewers of Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Martin Quinn, delegates at the International Management Control Research Conference, the EAA Annual Congress and the Irish Accounting and Finance Association Annual Conference. Thanks are also due to the many managers and management accountants who gave so generously of their time to make this research possible.

Citation

Byrne, S. and Pierce, B. (2018), "Exploring management accountants’ role conflicts and ambiguities and how they cope with them", Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 410-436. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-11-2016-0083

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles