Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T12:31:24.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence-Based I–O Psychology: Not There Yet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Rob B. Briner  and
Denise M. Rousseau
Rob B. Briner*
Affiliation:
University of London
Denise M. Rousseau
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
*
E-mail: r.briner@bbk.ac.uk, Address: Department of Organizational Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evidence-based practice is now well established in several fields including medicine, nursing, and social policy. This article seeks to promote discussion of whether the practice of industrial–organizational (I–O) psychologists is evidence based and what is needed to make I–O psychology an evidence-based discipline. It first reviews the emergence of the concept of evidence-based practice. Second, it considers the definitions and features of evidence-based practice, including evidence-based management. It then assesses whether I–O psychology is itself an evidence-based discipline by identifying key characteristics of evidence-based practice and judging the extent these characterize I–O psychology. Fourth, some key strategies for promoting the use of evidence in I–O psychology are considered: practice-oriented research and systematic reviews. Fifth, barriers to practicing evidence-based I–O psychology are identified along with suggestions for overcoming them. Last is a look to the future of an evidence-based I–O psychology that plays an important role in helping consultants, in-house I–O psychologists, managers, and organizations become more evidence based.

Type
Focal Article
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 3 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are very grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

References

Anderson, N., Herriot, P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The practitioner-researcher divide in industrial, work and organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now and where do we go from here? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 391–411. Google Scholar
Briner, R. B. (1998). What is an evidence-based approach to practice and why do we need one in occupational psychology? Proceedings of the 1998 British Psychological Society Occupational Psychology Conference, pp. 39–44. Google Scholar
Briner, R. B., Denyer, D., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Evidence-based management: Concept clean-up time? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 19–32. Google Scholar
Cherniss, C. (2010). Emotional intelligence: Toward clarification of a concept. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 110–126. Google Scholar
Friedson, E. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Gough, D. A., Kiwan, D., Sutcliffe, S., Simpson, D., & Houghton, N. (2003). A systematic map and synthesis review of the effectiveness of personal development planning for improved student learning. Retrieved from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWebContent/reel/review_groups/EPPI/LTSN/LTSN_June03.pdf Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. (1994). What if the academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19, 11–16. Google Scholar
Highhouse, S. (2008). Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employment selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 333–342. Google Scholar
Hollenbeck, G. (2009). Executive selection—What's right … and what's wrong. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 130–143. Google Scholar
Joyce, K., Pabayo, R., Critchley, J. A., & Bambra, C. (2010). Flexible working conditions and their effects on employee health and wellbeing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Art. No. CD008009. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008009.pub2.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541. Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Illies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807. Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effect of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. Google Scholar
Landy, F. J. (2008). Stereotypes, bias, and personnel decisions: Strange and stranger. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 379–392. Google Scholar
Lawler, E. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (in press). Doing research that is useful for theory and practice–25 years later (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett Koehler. Google Scholar
Learmonth, M., & Harding, N. (2006). Evidence-based management: The very idea. Public Administration, 84, 245–266. Google Scholar
Locke, E. A. (2005). Why emotional intelligence is an invalid concept. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 425–431. Google Scholar
Locke, E. A. (2009). Handbook of principles of organizational behavior: Indispensable knowledge for evidence-based management (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 3–30. Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In Salovey, P. and Sluyter, D. (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3–34). New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
McCall, M. W. (2010). Recasting leadership development. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 3–19. Google Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599–616. Google Scholar
McKenna, D. D., & Davis, S. L. (2009). Hidden in plain sight: The active ingredients of executive coaching. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 244–260. Google Scholar
Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Merrill, S. K., & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 315–372. Google Scholar
Morrell, K. (2008). The narrative of “evidence based” management: A polemic. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 613–635. Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2008). Explaining the weak relationship between job performance and ratings of job performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 148–160. Google Scholar
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review, 84, 62–74. Google Scholar
Pritchard, R. D., Harrell, M. M., DiazGranados, D., & Guzman, M. J. (2008). The productivity measurement and enhancement system: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 540–567. Google Scholar
Reay, T., Berta, W., & Kohn, M. (2009). What's the evidence on evidence-based management? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 5–18. Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as evidence-based management? Academy of Management Review, 31, 256–269. Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through reflective reviews. Annals of the Academy of Management, 2, 475–515. Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., & McCarthy, S. (2007). Evidence-based management: Educating managers from an evidence-based perspective. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6, 94–101. Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., Brown, K. G., & Colbert, A. E. (2002). Seven common misconceptions about human resource practices: Research findings versus practitioner beliefs. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 92–103. Google Scholar
Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenburg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone. Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L. (2009). Select on intelligence. In Locke, E. A. (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior: Indispensable knowledge for evidence-based management (2nd ed., pp. 3–18). New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Silzer, R., Cober, R., Erickson, A., & Robinson, G. (2008). Practitioner needs survey: Final survey report. SIOP Professional Practice Committee. Retrieved from www.siop.org/Practitioner%20Needs%20Survey.pdf Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1991). Where is the wisdom …? The poverty of medical evidence. British Medical Journal, 303, 798–799. Google Scholar
Soukup, S. M. (2000). The center for advanced nursing practice evidence-based practice model. Nursing Clinics of North America, 35, 301–309. Google Scholar
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Toward a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. Google Scholar
VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Bagget, W. B. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21, 209–249. Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31, 802–821. Google Scholar