Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:52:18.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Destructive Leadership and the Penn State Scandal: A Toxic Triangle Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Christian N. Thoroughgood  and
Art Padilla
Christian N. Thoroughgood*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Art Padilla
Affiliation:
The University of Arizona
*
E-mail: cnt105@psu.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, 115C Bruce V. Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Alderfer's (2013) piece on the Sandusky/Penn State tragedy reminds us that leader-centric analyses, the norm in leadership studies, often miss the mark. Alderfer joins a growing list of writers who increasingly recognize that leadership consists of three key elements in a triangle: leaders, followers, and environments. The Penn State scandal highlights how a conducive environment, typified by centralized power and an absence of checks and balances, coupled with flawed leaders and the actual assistance or quiet submission of certain followers, can lead to disastrous outcomes. As Alderfer observes, leadership is a social, or group, process. Leadership success or failure depends on group results, and group results involve more than just leaders and their characteristics and actions. Yet, over three-quarters of articles in scholarly journals consistently overlook the role of organizational environments and followers (Porter & McLaughlin, 2006), focusing instead on leader traits and behaviors (Kaiser, Hogan, & Craig, 2008; Thoroughgood, Padilla, Hunter, & Tate, 2012).

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 144 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderfer, C. (2013). Not just football: An intergroup perspective on the Sandusky scandal at Penn State. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 117–133.Google Scholar
Capeloto, A. (2012). Research spotlight: Caught in the balance: Information access in an era of privatized public higher. College Media Review. Retrieved from http://cmreview.org/research-spotlight-caught-in-the-balance/Google Scholar
Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, R., Hogan, R., & Craig, B. (2008). Leadership and the fate of organizations. American Psychologist, 63, 96–110.Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and obedience. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
Knight Commission (2006, February 6). Poll: Americans are concerned about college sports. Retrieved from http://knightcommission.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=187Google Scholar
Meindl, J. R., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1987). The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 91–109.Google Scholar
Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78–102.Google Scholar
Mulvey, P. W., & Padilla, A. (2010). The environment of destructive leadership. In Schyns, B., & Hansbrough, T. (Eds.), When leadership goes wrong: Destructive leadership, mistakes, and ethical failures (pp. 49–71). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Padilla, A. (2013). Leadership: Leaders, followers, and environments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176–194.Google Scholar
Porter, L., & McLaughlin, G. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 559–576.Google Scholar
Thoroughgood, C. N., Padilla, A., Hunter, S. T., & Tate, B. W. (2012). The susceptible circle: A taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 897–917.Google Scholar
Whiteside, K. (2011, November 22). Ex-Penn State official saw Paterno's “dark side.” USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/bigten/story/2011-11-22/11-22-11-Paterno-Discipline/51346682/1Google Scholar