Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:45:06.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women's Rights, the European Court, and Supranational Constitutionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Rachel A. Cichowski
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This analysis examines supranational constitutionalism in the European Union (EU). In particular, the study focuses on the role of the European Court of Justice in the creation of women's rights. I examine the interaction between the Court and member state governments in legal integration, and also the integral role that women's advocates—both individual activists and groups—have played in the development of EU social provisions. The findings suggest that this litigation dynamic can have the effect of fueling the integration process by creating new rights that may empower social actors and EU organizations, with the ultimate effect of diminishing member state government control over the scope and direction of EU law. This study focuses specifically on gender equality law yet provides a general framework for examining the case law in subsequent legal domains, with the purpose of providing a more nuanced understanding of supranational governance and constitutionalism.

Type
Constitutional Articulations
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 489 - 512
Copyright
© 2004 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author wishes to acknowledge the MacArthur Foundation and the Woodrow Wilson Foundation for generously supporting the data collection included in this analysis. The study also benefited from the invaluable comments of Alec Stone Sweet and many scholars at the European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy, where I conducted the research. I would also like to thank the special issue editor, Kim Lane Scheppele, and two reviewers for insightful comments on both the empirical analysis and the pregnancy case law. An earlier version of the pregnancy and maternity case law analysis appears in Cichowski (2001).

References

References

Alter, Karen (1998) “Who Are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’? European Governments and the European Court of Justice,” 52 International Organization 121–47.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen (2001) Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen, & Vargas, Jeannette (2000) “Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies: European Community Law and British Gender Equality Policy,” 33 Comparative Political Studies 452–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, Catherine (1999) “EC ‘Social’ Policy,” in Craig, P. & De Búrca, G., eds., The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Boch, Christine (1996) “Case Law: Court of Justice,” 33 Common Market Law Rev. 547–67.Google Scholar
Burley, Anne-M., & Mattli, Walter (1993) “Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration,” 47 International Organization 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caracciolo di Torella, Eugenia (1999) “Recent Developments in Pregnancy and Maternity Rights,” 28 Industrial Law J. 276–82.Google Scholar
Chamallas, Martha (2003) Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory, 2d ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. (1998) “Integrating the Environment: The European Court and the Construction of Supranational Policy,” 5 J. of European Public Policy 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. (2001) “Judicial Rulemaking and the Institutionalization of EU Sex Equality Policy,” in Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W., & Fligstein, N., eds., The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. (2002) “‘No Discrimination Whatsoever’: Women's Transnational Activism and the Evolution of European Sex Equality Policy,” in Naples, N. & Desai, A., eds., Women's Community Activism and Globalization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel, & Stone Sweet, Alec (2003) “Participation, Representative Democracy and the Courts,” in Cain, B., Dalton, R., & Scarrow, S., eds., Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa (2002) Justice Constrained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La Mare, Thomas (1999) “Article 177 in Social and Political Context,” in Craig, P. & De Búrca, G., eds., The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Evelyn (1998) European Community Sex Equality Law, 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Evelyn (1999) “Case Law: Court of Justice,” 36 Common Market Law Rev. 625–33.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey (1995) “The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union,” 49 International Organization 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, Kelemen, R. Daniel, & Schulz, Heiner (1998) “The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union,” 52 International Organization 149–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, Carol, & Rawlings, Richard (1992) Pressure Through Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoskyns, Catherine (1996) Integrating Gender. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Imig, Doug, & Tarrow, Sidney (2001) “Mapping the Europeanization of Contention: Evidence from a Quantitative Data Analysis,” in Imig, D. & Tarrow, S., eds., Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, & Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally (1992) For Whose Protection? Reproductive Hazards and Exclusionary Policies in the United States and Britain. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally (1995) “Pregnancy Discrimination: Toward Substantive Equality,” 10 Wisconsin Women's Law J. 351–402.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen (1990) “Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism,” 38 American J. of Comparative Law 205–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni (1997) “Sex Equality and the Rules of the Game,” in Gardiner, F., ed., Sex Equality Policy in Western Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mancini, G. Federico (1989) “The Making of a Constitution for Europe,” 24 Common Market Law Rev. 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., & Olsen, Johann P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary, & McAdam, Doug (1998) “Social Movements and the Changing Structure of Political Opportunity in the European Union,” in Marks, G., Scharpf, F., Schmitter, P., & Streek, W., eds., Governance in the European Union. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, & Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1998) “Revisiting the European Court of Justice,” 52 International Organization 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazey, Sonia (1988) “European Community Action on Behalf of Women: The Limits of Legislation,” 27 J. of Common Market Studies 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
More, Gillian (1992) “Reflections on Pregnancy Dismissal Under European Community Law,” 1 The J. of Social Welfare and Family Law 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul (2000) “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” 94 American Political Science Rev. 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul, & Leibfried, S., eds. (1995) European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Pillinger, Jane (1992) Feminising the Market. London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prechal, Sacha, & Burrows, Nancy (1990) Gender Discrimination Law of the European Community. Brookfield, VT: Gower Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin (1981) Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin (1988) Who Guards the Guardians: Judicial Control of Administration. Athens: Univ. of Georgia.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jo (1999) “Pregnancy, Maternity and Dismissals: A Clarification?,” 21 The J. of Social Welfare and Family Law 81–88.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Stone Sweet, Alec, & Weiler, Joseph H. H., eds. (1998) The European Court and the National Courts—Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context. Oxford, UK: Hart Press.Google Scholar
Sohrab, Julia (1996) Sexing the Benefit: Women, Social Security and Financial Independence in EC Sex Equality Law. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec (2000) Governing with Judges. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, & Brunell, Tom (1998) “Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community,” 92 American Political Science Rev. 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, & Sandholtz, Wayne (1998) “Integration, Supranational Governance, and the Institutionalization of the European Polity,” in Sandholtz, W. & Stone Sweet, A., eds., European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Szyszczak, Erika (1993) “Sex Discrimination and Pregnant Women,” 22 Industrial Law J. 136–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1981) “The Community System: the Dual Character of Supranationalism,” 1 Yearbook of European Law 268–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1991) “The Transformation of Europe,” 100 Yale Law J. 2403–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, D. Kelly, ed. (1996) Applications of Feminist Legal Theory to Women's Lives: Sex, Violence, Work and Reproduction. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

ECJ 1963. Van Gend en Loos, Case 26/62, ECR 1963: 1.Google Scholar
ECJ 1964. Costa, Case 6/64, ECR 1964: 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ECJ 1971. Defrenne I, Case 80/70, ECR 1971: 445.Google Scholar
ECJ 1976. Defrenne II, Case 43/75, ECR 1976: 455.Google Scholar
ECJ 1978. Defrenne III, Case 149/77, ECR 1978: 1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ECJ 1986. Bilka, Case 170/84, ECR 1986: 1607.Google Scholar
ECJ 1990a. Dekker, Case C-177/88, ECR 1990: 3941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ECJ 1990b. Hertz, Case C-179/88, ECR 1990: 3979.Google Scholar
ECJ 1993. Ten Oever, Case C-109/91, ECR 1993: 4879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ECJ 1994a. Habermann-Beltermann v. Arbeiterwohlfahrt, Case C-421/92, ECR 1994: 1657.Google Scholar
ECJ 1994b. Webb, Case C-32/93, ECR 1994: 3567.Google Scholar
ECJ 1995. Kalanke, Case C-450/93, ECR 1995: 3051.Google Scholar
ECJ 1996. Gillespie, Case C-342/93, ECR 1996: 475.Google Scholar
ECJ 1997. Larsson, Case C-400/95, ECR 1997: 4135.Google Scholar
ECJ 1998a. Brown, Case C-394/96, ECR 1998: 4185.Google Scholar
ECJ 1998b. Thibault, Case C-136/95, ECR 1998: 2011.Google Scholar
ECJ 1998c. Boyle, Case C-411/96, ECR 1998: 6401.Google Scholar
ECJ 1998d. Pedersen, Case C-66/96, ECR 1998: 7327.Google Scholar