Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A review of ghost fishing: scientific approaches to evaluation and solutions

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Fisheries Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on ghost fishing became active in the late 1980s. Ghost fishing has been confirmed for traps, gillnets, trammel-nets and small seine nets. Some lost traps are functional for a long period of time, even in shallow waters. Consequences for gillnets after loss depend on seabed conditions. The ghost fishing function of gillnets remaining on flat seabeds declines rapidly with decreasing heights and increasing visibility. Gillnets left tangled around an artificial reef, for example, three-dimensionally maintain the initial magnitude of ghost fishing for a long period of time, even after badly fouled. There are increasing numbers of researches working on the total number of mortality per gear after gear loss for gillnets and trammel-nets. It has become also possible to estimate the total number of mortality for a unit period of time in a certain fishing sector. This paper reviews research which has provided evidence and quantitative data on ghost fishing, and proposes five items important for future studies on ghost fishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheldon WW. Trap contribution of losses in the American lobster fishery. Fish. Bull. 1975; 73: 449–451.

    Google Scholar 

  2. High WL. Escape of Dungeness crabs from pots. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1976; 38: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous. Report of the Expert Consultation on Large-Scale Pelagic Driftnet Fishing, Report 434 FAO Fisheries, Rome. 1990.

  4. Wright A, Doulman DJ. Drift-net fishing in the South Pacific: from controversy to management. Mar. Policy 1991; 15: 303–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Richards AH. Problems of drift-net fisheries in the South Pacific. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1994; 29: 106–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. FAO, Rome. 1995.

  7. Smolowitz RJ. Trap design and ghost fishing: an overview. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1978; 40: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pecci KJ, Cooper RA, Newell CD, Clifford RA, Smolowitz RJ, Ghost fishing of vented and unvented lobster, Homarus americanus, traps. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1978; 40: 9–43

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muir WD, Durkin JT, Coley TC, McCabe GT. Escape of captured Dungeness crabs from commercial crab pots in the Columbia River estuary. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 1984; 4: 552–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Breen PA. Mortality of Dungeness crabs caused by lost traps in the Fraser River Estuary, British Columbia. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 1987; 7: 429–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parrish FA, Kazama TK. Evaluation of ghost fishing in the Hawaiian lobster fishery. Fish. Bull. 1992; 90: 720–725.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guillory V. Ghost fishing by blue crab traps. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 1993; 13: 459–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kimker A. Tanner crab survival in closed pots. Alaska Fish. Res. Bull. 1994; 1: 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vienneau R, Moriyasu M. Study of the impact of ghost fishing on snow crab, Chionoecetes opilio, by conventional conical traps. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1994; 1984: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuoka T, Osako T, Miyagi M. Underwater observation and assessment on ghost fishing by lost fish-traps. In: Zhou Y, Zhou H, Yao C, Lu Y, Hu F, Chui H, Din F (eds). Fourth Asian Fish. Forum. Asian Fisheries Society, Beijing, 1997; 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smolowitz RJ. Trap design and ghost fishing: discussion. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1978; 40: 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laist DW. Marine debris entanglement and ghost fishing: A cryptic and significant type of bycatch? In: Wray T (ed). Proc. Solving Bycatch Workshop. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, Seattle, WA. 1996; 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koike A. Pot structure and the catch. In: The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science (ed.). Pot Fishery. Koseishakoseikaku, Tokyo. 1981; 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Matsuoka T. Ghost fishing by lost fish-traps in Azuma-ch water. Mini Rev. Data File Fish. Res. 1999; 8: 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Watanabe T. Simulated ghost fishing experiment on size selectivity of red queen crab traps. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi. 2005; 71: 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barney W. Lost Gillnet Retrieval Project. 1983–1984. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, St. John’s. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carr HA, Amaral EH, Hulbert AW, Cooper R. Underwater survey of simulated lost demersal and lost commercial gill nets off New England. In: Shomura RS, Yoshida HO (eds). Proc. Workshop on the Fate and Impact of Marine Debris, 26–29 November 1984, Honolulu, Hawaii. IEEE Oceanic Engineering Society, 1985; 438–447.

  23. Carr HA, Cooper RA. Manned submersible and ROV assessment of ghost gillnets in the Gulf of Maine. Proc. Oceans’87. Ocean An Int. Workplace 1987; 1: 622–624.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carr HA. Long term assessment of a derelict gill net found in the Gulf of marine. Proc. Oceans’88 1988; 2: 984–986.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carr HA, Blott AJ, Caruso PG. A study of ghost gillnets in the inshore waters of southern New England. Proc. Global Ocean Partnership. Marine Technology Society Conference, Washington DC, 1992; 361–366.

  26. Kaiser MJ, Bullimore B, Newman P, Lock K, Gilbert S. Catches in ‘ghost fishing’ set nets. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1996; 145: 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Erzini K, Monteiro CC, Ribeiro J, Santos MN, Gaspar M, Monteiro P, Borges TC. An experimental study of gill net and trammel net ‘ghost fishing’ off the Algarve (southern Portugal). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1997; 147: 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Santos MN, Saldanha HJ, Gasper MB, Monteiro CC. Hake (Merluccius merluccius L., 1758) ghost fishing by gill nets off the Algarve (southern Portugal). Fish. Res. 2003; 64: 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sancho G, Puente E, Bilbao A, Gomez E, Arregi L. Catch rates of monkfish (Lophius spp.) by lost tangle nets in the Cantabrian Sea (northern Spain). Fish. Res. 2003; 64: 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Humborstad O, Løkkeborg S, Hareide NR, Furevik DM, Catches of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) in deepwater ghost fishing gillnets on the Norwegian continental slope. Fish. Res. 2003; 64: 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakashima T, Matsuoka T. Ghost fishing ability decreasing over time for lost bottom-gillnet and estimation of total number of mortality. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 2004; 70: 728–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakashima T, Matsuoka T. Ghost fishing mortality and fish aggregation by lost bottom-gillnet tangled around fish aggregation device. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 2005; 71: 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsushita Y, Honda N, Fujita K, Watanabe T. Time series changes in gillnets abandoned at shallow water. Bull. Fish. Res. Agen. 2004; 10: 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Revill AS, Dunlin G. The fishing capacity of gillnets lost on wrecks and on open ground in UK coastal waters. Fish. Res. 2003; 64: 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saldanha HJ, Sancho G, Santos MN, Puente E, Gasper MB, Bilbao A, Monteiro CC, Gomez E, Arregi L. The use of biofouling for ageing lost nets: a case study. Fish. Res. 2003; 64: 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Matsuoka T. Estimation of ghost fishing mortality and its evaluation. In: Arimoto T, Haluan J (eds). Proc. 3rd JSPS International Seminar on Fisheries Science in Tropical Area Sustainable Fishing Technology in Asia Towards the 21st Century 19–21 August 1999 Bali Island—Indonesia. Tokyo, 2000; 373.

  37. Stevens BG. Crab bycatch in pot fisheries: causes and solutions. In: Wray T (ed). Proc. Solving Bycatch Workshop. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, Seattle, WA. 1996; 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stevens BG, Vining I, Byersdorfer S, Donaldson WT. Ghost fishing by Tanner crab (Chionoecetes bairdi) pots off Kodiak, Alaska: pot density and catch per trap as determined from sidescan sonar and pot recovery data. Fish. Bull. 2000; 98: 389–399.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hébert M, Miron G, Moriyasu M, Vienneau R, DeGâce P. Efficiency and ghost fishing of snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) traps in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Fish. Res. 2001; 52: 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bullimore BA, Newman PB, Kaiser MJ, Gilbert SE, Lock KM. A study of catches in a fleet of ‘ghost fishing’ pots. Fish. Bull. 2001; 99: 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Miller RJ. Effectiveness of crab and lobster traps. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1990; 47: 1228–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Godøy H, Furevik DM, Stiansen S. Unnacounted mortality of red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) in deliberately lost potts off Northern Norwey. Fish. Res. 2003; 64: 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tschernij V, Larsson PO. Ghost fishing by lost cod gill nets in the Baltic Sea. Fish. Res. 2003; 64: 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Santos MN, Saldanha H, Grasper MB, Monteiro CC. Causes and rates of net loss off Algarve (southern Portugal). Fish. Res. 2003; 64: 115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Breen PA. Ghost fishing by Dungeness crab traps: a preliminary report. Can. Manuscr. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1985; 1848: 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Coleman FC, Wehle DHS. Caught by accident: the fishermen’s unwanted harvest. Oceans. 1983; 16: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Henderson JR. Encounters of Hawaiian monk seals with fishing gear at Lisianski Island, 1982. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1984; 46: 59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jones MM. Fishing debris in the Australian marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1995; 30: 25–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Donohue MJ, Brainard R, Parke M, Foley D. Mitigation of environmental impacts of derelict fishing gear through debris removal and environmental monitoring, International Marine Debris Conference, Honolulu. 2000; 58–78

  50. Donohue MJ, Boland RC, Sramek CM, Antonelis GA. Derelict fishing gear in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands: diving surveys and debris removal in 1999 confirm threat to coral reef ecosystem. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2001; 42: 1301–1312.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Henderson JR. A Pre- and Post-MARPOLAnnex Summary of Hawaiian Monk Seal Entanglements and Marine Debris Accumulation in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, 1982–1998. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2001; 42: 584–589.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Stewart BS, Yochem, PK. Entanglement of pinnipeds in synthetic debris and fishing net and line fragments at San Nicolas and San Miguel Island, California, 1978–1986. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1987; 18: 336–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Carr A. Impact of non-degradable marine debris on the ecology and survival outlook of sea turtles. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1987; 18 (6B): 352–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Degange AR, Newby TC. Mortality of seabirds and fish in a lost salmon driftnet. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1980; 11: 322–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sutherland DL, Beardsley GL, Jones RS. Results of a survey of the south-Florida fish-trap fishing grounds using a manned submersible. Northeast Gulf Sci. 1983; 6: 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Galgani F, Souplet A, Cadiou Y. Accumulation of debris on the deep floor off the French Mediterranean coast. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1996; 142: 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Slip DJ, Burton HR. Accumulation of fishing debris, plastic litter, and other artifacts, on Heard and Macquarie Islands in the southern ocean. Environ. Conser. 1991; 18: 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Franson JC, Hansen SP, Duerr AE, Destefano S. Size and Mass of Grit in Gizzards of Sandhill Cranes, Tundra Swans, and Mute Swans. Waterbirds 2001; 2: 242–244.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jacks G, Bystroem M, Johansson L. Lead emissions from lost fishing sinkers. Boreal Environ. Res. 2001; 6: 231–236.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Anonymous. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries 1—Fishing Operations. FAO, Rome. 1996.

  61. Bech G. Retrieval of lost gillnets at Ilulissat Kangia, NAFO Sci. Counc. Res. Doc. 95/6. 1995.

  62. Blott AJ. A preliminary study of timed release mechanisms for lobster trap. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1978; 40: 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Scarsbrook JR, McFarlane GA, Shaw W. Effectiveness of experimental escape mechanisms in sabkefish traps. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 1988; 8: 158–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Arcement E, Guillory V. Ghost fishing in vented and unvented blue crab traps. Proc. LA. Acad. Sci. 1993; 56: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Fogarty MJ. The lobster fishery: escape vents and bycatch issues. In: Castro K, Corey T, DeAlteris J, Gagnon C (eds). Proc. East Coast Bycatch Conference. Rhode Island Sea Grant, Rhode Island. 1996; 63–64.

  66. Blois S. The implementation of the galvanic time release mechanism on queen crab pots in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. A case of more responsible fishing. Proc. MTS ’92: Global Ocean Partnership. Marine Technology Soc., Washington DC. 1992; 415.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Selliah N, Oxenford H, Parker C. Selecting biodegradable fasteners and testing the effects of escape panels on catch rates of fish traps. In: Creswell RL (ed). Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Institute. Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, Florida. 2001; 52: 634–653.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Naoki Nagasawa

    Present address: , Tezukayama, 631-0062, Nara, Japan

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Fisheries, Kagoshima University, Shimoarata, 890-0056, Kagoshima, Japan

    Tatsuro Matsuoka, Toshiko Nakashima & Naoki Nagasawa

Authors
  1. Tatsuro Matsuoka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toshiko Nakashima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naoki Nagasawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuro Matsuoka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsuoka, T., Nakashima, T. & Nagasawa, N. A review of ghost fishing: scientific approaches to evaluation and solutions. Fish Sci 71, 691–702 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.01019.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.01019.x

Key Words

Search

Navigation