Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:53:12.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Is (Feminist) Philosophy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Rosalyn Diprose
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What makes us think, and what makes us think as feminists? In seeking to answer these questions, this paper draws on both Deleuze and Guattari's account of the creation of concepts, and feminist thought on feminist thinking, before suggesting with Levinas that our relation to ideas is primarily affective. Via further engagement with Levinas, I argue that it is the relation to the other which provokes and produces thought; models of autonomous theorizing are thereby supplanted by the teaching of the other.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 15 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Going Australian: Reconfiguring Feminism and Philosophy , Spring 2000 , pp. 115 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, Alison 1988. Amorous discourses: “The phenomenology of eros.” In The provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the other, ed. Bernasconi, Robert and Wood, David. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beauvoit, Simone de. 1972. The second sex. Trans. Parshley, H. M. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bricmont, Jean, and Sokal, Alan. 1997. Impostures intellectuelles. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 1995. Ethics of eros: Irigaray's rewriting of the philosophers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina, ed. Forthcoming. Feminist interpretations of Emmanuel Levinas. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Curthoys, Jean 1997. Feminist amnesia: The wake of women's liberation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1994. What is philosophy? Trans. Burchell, Graham and Tomlinson, Hugh. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Diprose, Rosalyn 1991. A “genethics” that makes sense. In Cartographies: Poststructuralism and the mapping of bodies and spaces, ed. Diprose, Rosalyn and Ferrell, Robyn. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira 1986. Feminism, philosophy and riddles without answers. In Feminist challenges: Social and political theory, ed. Pateman, Carole and Gross, Elizabeth. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1985. This sex which is not one. In This sex which is not one, Trans. Porter, Cathetine. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1988. The fecundity of the caress. In Face to face with Levinas, ed. Cohen, Richard A.Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Kerruish, Erika 1997. Derrida and “I”: Dealing with Nietzsche's women. Unpublished paper, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Le Dœuff, Michèle. 1991. Hipparchia's choice: An essay concerning women, philosophy, etc. Trans. Selous, Trista. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1969. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1981. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1987a. Meaning and sense. In Emmanuel Levinas: Collected philosophical papers, Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1987b. Philosophy and the idea of infinity. In Emmanuel Levinas: Collected philosophical papers, Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve 1993. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in western philosophy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1967. On the genealogy of morals. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1978. Thus spoke Zarathustra: A book for all and none. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter. Hammondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Patton, Paul 1996. Concept and event. Man and World 29: 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperzak, Adriaan 1993. To the other: An introduction to the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Sandford, Stella 1998. Writing as a man: Levinas and the phenomenology of eros. Radical Philosophy 87: 6–17.Google Scholar
Vasseleu, Cathryn 1998. Textures of light: Vision and touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau‐Ponty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wirzba, Norman 1995. From maieutics to metanoia: Levinas's understanding of the philosophical task. Man and World 28: 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar