Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:41:27.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electoral Competition and the New Party System in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Joseph L. Klesner
Joseph L. Klesner*
Affiliation:
Kenyon College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mexico's former opposition parties had specific social bases that would not, on their own, have catapulted either opposition party into power. In the 1990s, specific regional bases of support developed for the parties, reflecting their efforts to develop their organizations more locally. Nationally, this led to the emergence of two parallel two-party systems, PAN-PRI competition in the north and center-west and PRD-PRI competition in the south. In parallel, a proregime-antiregime cleavage came to dominate the Mexican party system, which, combined with local-level opposition efforts to oust the PRI, created new incentives for the opposition parties to abandon past emphases on ideological differences and to act like catch-all parties instead. The regime cleavage fostered the dealignment of the Mexican electorate, a process that promoted the development of catch-all parties. Movement within the parties to behave like catch-all parties has not come without internal tensions, but electoral dynamics prove powerful inducements to catch-all behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , Summer 2005 , pp. 103 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, Barry. 1970. Bases of Support for Mexico's Dominant Party. American Political Science Review 64, 1 (March): 1–67.Google Scholar
Barraza, Leticia, and Ilán, Bizberg 1991. El Partido Acción Nacional y el régimen político méxicano. Foro Internacional 31, 3 (January–March): 1–45.Google Scholar
Belden and Russonello Research and Communications 1994. Survey of Electoral Preferences in Mexico, 1994 July 23-August 1.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, Frank. 1964. The Making of Modern Mexico. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1997. Taking on Goliath: The Emergence of a New Left Party and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn, 1998. The Partido de la Revolución Democrática: Diverging Approaches to Competition. In Governing Mexico: Political Parties and Elections, ed. Mónica, Serrano London : Institute of Latin American Studies. 1–36.Google Scholar
Bruhn, 2004. The Making of the President, Parties, Candidates, and Campaign Strategy. In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Chappell, Lawson. Stanford : Stanford University Press. 1–56.Google Scholar
Buendía, Jorge. 2000. El elector mexicano en los noventa: un nuevo tipo de votante Política y Gobierno 7, 2: 1–52.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York : W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1980. Mexico's Leaders: Their Education and Recruitment. Tucson : University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Camp, 1994. The Cross in the Polling Booth: Religion, Politics, and the Laity in Mexico. Latin American Research Review 29, 3: 1–100.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Philip, Converse, Donald, Stokes, and Warren, Miller. 1960. The American Voter. New York : Wiley.Google Scholar
Consulta Mitofsky 2000. Encuesta de salida. Elecciones presidenciales. July 2.Google Scholar
Consulta Mitofsky 2003. 6 de Julio de 2000, características del voto. July. http:www.consulta.com.mx.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A., Judith, Gentleman., and Peter, H. Smith. eds. 1989. Mexico's Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla : Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Craig, Ann L., and Wayne, A. Cornelius. 1995. Houses Divided: Parties and Political Reform in Mexico. In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Scott, Mainwaring. and Timothy, R. Scully. Stanford : Stanford University Press. 1–97.Google Scholar
Crespo, José Antonio. 2004. The Party System and Democratic Governance in Mexico. Policy Papers on the Americas, 15, 2. Washington, Dc: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Scott, C. Flanagan., and Paul, Allen Beck eds. 1984. Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Democracy Through Mexican Lenses 2000. Survey. Directed by Roderic Ai Camp (principal investigator), funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation Grant 2000–4406. August 20–September 6.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and James, A. McCann. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York : Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. New York : Wiley.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1979. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven : Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gallup Organization 1988. Mexico Pre-Election Survey. May 12–June 1.Google Scholar
Garrido, Luis Javier. 1989. The Crisis of Presidencialismo. In Cornelius, et al. 1989. 1–34.Google Scholar
Grayson, George W. 2002. A Guide to the Leadership Elections of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, the National Action Party, and the Democratic Revolutionary Party. Policy Papers on the Americas 13, 1. Washington, Dc: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Hernández Rodríguez, Rogelio. 1998. The Partido Revolucionario Institucional. In Serrano, 1998. 1–94.Google Scholar
Instituto de Estadística, Geográfica e Informática (INEGI) Various years. Census data. http:www.inegi.gob.mx.Google Scholar
Instituto Federal Electoral (IFE) Various years. Electoral data. http:www.ife.org.mx.Google Scholar
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) 1997. Post-Election Poll. July 1–27.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kenneth F. 1971. Mexican Democracy: A Critical View. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr 1955. A Theory of Critical Elections. Journal of Politics 17, 1 (February): 1–18.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 1987. Changing Patterns of Electoral Participation and Official Party Support in Mexico. In Mexican Politics in Transition, ed. Judith, Gentleman. Boulder : Westview Press. 1–152.Google Scholar
Klesner, 1993. Modernization, Economic Crisis, and Electoral Alignment in Mexico. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 9, 2 (Summer): 1–223.Google Scholar
Klesner, 1994. Realignment or Dealignment?Consequences of Economic Crisis and Restructuring for the Mexican Party System. In Politics of Economic Restructuring: State-Society Relations and Regime Change in Mexico, ed. María, Lorena Cook, Kevin, Middlebrook, and Juan, Molinar Horcasitas La Jolla : Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego. 1–91.Google Scholar
Klesner, 1995. The 1994 Mexican Elections: Manifestation of a Divided Society Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 11, 1 (Winter): 1–49.Google Scholar
Klesner, 1997. Dissolving Hegemony: Electoral Competition and the Decline of Mexico's One-Party Dominant Regime. Paper presented at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, Dc, August 1–31.Google Scholar
Klesner, 1999. The 1998 Mexican State Elections: Post-Election Report. Western Hemisphere Election Study Series 17, 1. Washington , DC : Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Klesner, 2004. The Structure of the Mexican Electorate: Social, Attitudinal, and Partisan Bases of Vicente Fox's Victory. In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Chappell, Lawson. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell, and Joseph, L. Klesner. 2002. The Mexican Voter, Electoral Dynamics, and Partisan Realignment: Reflections on the 2000 Elections with an Eye toward 2003 Paper prepared for the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29–September 1.Google Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad. 1999. El Partido Acción Nacional: la larga marcha, 1939–1994, oposición leal y partido deprotesta, Mexico City : Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso. 1995. De la hegemonía a las alternativas: diseños institucionales y el futuro de los partidos políticos en México. Política y Gobierno 1, 1: 1–71.Google Scholar
Mabry, Donald J. 1974. Mexico's Acción Nacional: A Catholic Alternative to Revolution. Syracuse : Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 1999. Is the PRI Fading?Economic Performance, Electoral Accountability, and Voting Behavior in the 1994 and 1997 Elections. In Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Alejandro, Poiré New York : Routledge. 1–36.Google Scholar
Martínez, Rodríguez 1998. Parliamentary Elites and the Polarization of the Party System in Mexico. In Serrano, 1998. 1–68.Google Scholar
McCann, James A. 2004. Primary Priming. In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Chappell, Lawson. Stanford : Stanford University Press. 1–83.Google Scholar
Mexico. 2000 Panel Study, directed by Miguel Basáñez, Roderic Camp, Wayne Cornelius, Jorge Domínguez, Federico Estévez, Joseph Klesner, Chappell Lawson (Principal Investigator), Beatriz Magaloni, James McCann, Alejandro Moreno, Pablo Parás, and Alejandro Poiré. Support for the Mexico 2000 Panel Study was provided by the National Science Foundation (Ses-9905703) and Reforma newspaper the data cited are from the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Waves (February, May, June, and July 2000) and the Fifth Wave (May 2002).Google Scholar
Meyer, Jean. 1979. El sinarquismo: un fascismo mexicano Mexico City : Joaquín Mortiz.Google Scholar
Meyer, Lorenzo. 1989. Democratization of the Pri: Mission Impossible? In Cornelius, et al. 1989. 1–48.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile. 1994. Rebels without a Cause?the Politics of Entrepreneurs in Chihuahua. Journal of Latin American Studies 26, 1 (February): 1–58.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, 1998. The Costs of Electoral Success: the Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. In Serrano, 1998. 1–113.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, 2003. From Martyrdom to Power: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. Notre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan. 1989. The Future of the Electoral System. In Cornelius, et al. 1989. 1–90.Google Scholar
Molinar, Horcasitas. 1991a. El tiempo de la legitimidad: elecciones, autoritarismo y democracia en México. Mexico City : Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Molinar, Horcasitas. 1991b. Counting the Number of Parties: an Alternative Index. American Political Science Review 85, 4 (December), 1–92.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan, and Jeffrey, A. Weldon. 1990. Elecciones de 1988 En México: crisis del autoritarismo. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 52, 4 (October–December): 1–62.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 1998. Party Competition and the Issue of Democracy: Ideological Space in Mexican Elections. In Serrano, 1998. 1–57.Google Scholar
Moreno, 2003. El votante mexicano: democracia, actitudes políticas y conducta electoral. Mexico City : Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro, and Keith, Yanner. 2000. Predictors of Voter Preferences in Mexico's 1994 Presidential Election. Documentos de Trabajo en Ciencia Política Wpps 2000–07. Departamento Académico de Ciencia Política, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.Google Scholar
New York times 1986. Mexico Survey, 1986 (ICPSR 8666). October 28–November 4.Google Scholar
Pacheco Méndez, Guadalupe. 1997. Un caleidoscopio electoral: ciudades y elecciones en México, 1988–1994. Estudios Sociológicos 15, 44: 1–50.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Méndez, and Juan, Reyes Campillo 1989. La estructura sectorial del Pri y las elecciones federales de diputados 1979–1988. Sociológia (September–December): 1–74.Google Scholar
Poiré, Alejandro. 1999. Retrospective Voting, Partisanship, and Loyalty in Presidential Elections: 1994. In Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Poiré, New York : Routledge. 1–56.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L., John, Gorman, and Charles, Phillips. 1976. Comment: toward an Investment Theory of Voting Behavior: What Have You Done for Me Lately American Political Science Review 70, 3 (September): 1–805.Google Scholar
Purcell, John F. H., and Susan, Kaufman Purcell 1976. Machine Politics and Socio-economic Change in Mexico. In Contemporary Mexico: Papers of the IV International Congress on Mexican History, ed. James, W. Wilkie, Michael, C. Meyer, and Edna, Monzón Wilkie Berkeley : University of California Press. 1–66.Google Scholar
Reforma (Mexico City). 2003. Impera desinterés en abstencionistas. July 7.Google Scholar
Robinson, William S. 1950. Ecological Correlation and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review 15, 3 (June): 1–57.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E., and Peter, M. Ward. 1992. Policymaking, Politics, and Urban Governance in Chihuahua: the Experience of Recent Panista Governments U.S. Mexican Policy Report no. 3. LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Serrano, Mónica ed. 1998. Governing Mexico: Political Parties and Elections. London : Institute of Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
Shirk, David A. 2004. Mexico's New Politics: The PAN and Democratic Change. Boulder : Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 1979. Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States, rev. ed. Washington , DC : Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Valdés, Leonardo. 1994. Partido de la Revolución Democrática: The Third Option in Mexico. In Party Politics in An Uncommon Democracy: Political Parties and Elections in Mexico, ed. Neil, Harvey. and Mónica, Serrano London : Institute of Latin Amerian Studies. 1–75.Google Scholar