Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:56:10.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teams Are Changing: Time to “Think Networks”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Toshio Murase ,
Daniel Doty ,
Amy Wax ,
Leslie A. DeChurch  and
Noshir S. Contractor
Toshio Murase*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Daniel Doty
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Amy Wax
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Leslie A. DeChurch
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Noshir S. Contractor
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
*
E-mail: toshio.murase@gmail.com, Address: The Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 41 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors wish to acknowledge the following funding sources that contributed to the development of materials presented in this chapter: National Science Foundation Grants: BCS- 0940851 and IIS-0838564.

References

Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Network, 12, 374–395. Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991–1013. Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis. A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246. Google Scholar
Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, N. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 681–703. Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. Google Scholar
Guimera, R., Uzzi, R., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308, 697–702. Google Scholar
Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (2003). Some dynamics of social balance processes: Bringing Heider back into balance theory. Social Networks, 25, 17–49. Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M. S., & Potts, B. B. (1998). Centrality and power revisited: Actor success in group decision making. Social Networks, 20, 353–387. Google Scholar
Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Poole, M. S., & Contractor, N. S. (2011). Conceptualizing the multiteam system as a system of networked groups. In Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & DeChurch, L. A. (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments (pp. 193–224). New York, NY: Routledge Academic. Google Scholar
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502–517. Google Scholar
Roberts, K. H., Hulin, C. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1978). Developing an interdisciplinary science of organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 173–191. Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., Schweinberger, M., & Huisman, M. (2007). Manual for SIENA, version 3.2. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen. Google Scholar
Sparrowe, R. T. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316–325. Google Scholar
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 2–24. Google Scholar