Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T12:25:37.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridging Diversity in Organizations and Cross-Cultural Work Psychology by Studying Perceived Differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Meir Shemla  and
Bertolt Meyer
Meir Shemla*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden
Bertolt Meyer
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
*
E-mail: shemla@psychologie.tu-dresden.de, Address: Work and Organizational Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher weg 17, 01062 Dresden, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 370 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, S., Villado, A., Lukasik, M., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37, 709–743. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310365001Google Scholar
Ferdman, B. M., & Sagiv, L. (2012). Diversity in organizations and cross-cultural work psychology: What if they were more connected? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice., 5, 323–345. Google Scholar
Guillaume, Y., Brodbeck, F., & Riketta, M. (2012). Surface- and deep-level dissimilarity effects on social integration and individual effectiveness related outcomes in work groups: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 80–115. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02005.xGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096Google Scholar
Homan, A. C., Greer, L. L., Jehn, K. A., & Koning, L. (2010). Believing shapes seeing: The impact of diversity beliefs on the construal of group composition. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 477–493. DOI: 10.1177/1368430209350747Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2010). The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 24–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.008Google Scholar
Meyer, B., Shemla, M., & Schermuly, C. C. (2011). Social category salience moderates the effect of diversity faultlines on information elaboration. Small Group Research, 42, 257–282. DOI: 10.1177/1046496411398396Google Scholar
Oosterhof, A., Van der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., Sanders, K., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2009). What's the difference? Insider perspectives on the importance, content, and meaning of interpersonal differences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 617–637. DOI: 10.1348/096317908X342909Google Scholar