Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stress Variations in the Human Aortic Root and Valve: The Role of Anatomic Asymmetry

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The asymmetry of the aortic valve and aortic root may influence their biomechanics, yet was not considered in previous valve models. This study developed an anatomically representative model to evaluate the regional stresses of the valve within the root environment. A finite-element model was created from magnetic-resonance images of nine human valve–root specimens, carefully preserving their asymmetry. Regional thicknesses and anisotropic material properties were assigned to higher-order elastic shell elements representing the valve and root. After diastolic pressurization, peak principal stresses were evaluated for the right, left, and noncoronary leaflets and root walls. Valve stresses were highest in the noncoronary leaflet (538 kPa vs right 473 kPa vs left 410 kPa); peak stresses were located at the free margin and belly near the coaptation surfaces (averages 537 and 482 kPa for all leaflets, respectively). Right and noncoronary sinus stresses were 21% and 10% greater than the left sinus. In all sinuses, stresses near the annulus were higher than near the sinotubular junction. Stresses vary across the valve and root, likely due to their inherent morphologic asymmetry and stress sharing. These factors may influence bioprosthetic valve durability and the incidence of isolated sinus dilatation. © 1998 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC98: 8745Bp, 8710+e, 0270Dh

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bellhouse, B. J. Velocity and pressure distributions in the aortic valve. J. Fluid Mech.37:587-600, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cataloglu, A., R. E. Clark, and P. L. Gould. Stress analysis of aortic valve leaflets with smoothed geometrical data. J. Biomech.10:153-8, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chong, M., M. Eng, and Y. F. Missirlis. Aortic valve mechanics. Part II: a stress analysis of the porcine aortic valve leaflets in diastole. Biomater. Med. Devices Artif. Organs6:225-44, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christie, G. W. Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.1:S95-100, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christie, G. W., and B. G. Barratt Boyes. Identification of a failure mode of the antibiotic sterilized aortic allograft after 10 years: Implications for their long-term survival. J. Cardiol. Surg.6:462-7, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christie, G. W., and I. C. Medland. A non-linear finite element stress analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves. In: Finite Elements in Biomechanics, edited by R. H. Gallagher, B. R. Simon, P. C. Johnson, and J. F. Gross. New York: Wiley, 1982, pp. 153-179.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christie, G. W., and R. A. Stephenson. Modelling the mechanical role of the fibrosa and the ventricularis in the porcine bioprosthesis. In: Surgery for Heart Valve Disease, edited by E. Bodnar. London: Heart Valve Diseases, 1989, pp. 815-827.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, R. E., and E. H. Finke. Scanning and light microscopy of human aortic leaflets in stressed and relaxed states. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.67:792-804, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooley, D. A. Surgical Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1986, p. 215.

  10. David, T. E., C. M. Feindel, and J. Bos. Repair of the aortic valve in patients with aortic insufficiency and aortic root aneurysm. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.109:345-51, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Del Rizzo, D. F., B. S. Goldman, and T. E. David. Aortic valve replacement with a stentless porcine bioprosthesis: Multicentre trial. Canadian Investigators of the Toronto SPV Valve Trial. Can. J. Cardiol.11:597-603, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dobrin, P. B. Vascular mechanics. In: Handbook of Physiology, edited by J. T. Shepherd and F. Abboud. Washington, D.C.: American Physiological Society, 1983, pp. 65-102.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher, J., M. Butterfield, K. J. Lockie, and G. A. Davies. A model of the geometrical changes in aortic valve leaflets in response to leaflet extension and variable boundary conditions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H206:7-14, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frater W. Aortic valve insufficiency due to aortic dilatation: correction by sinus rim adjustment. Circulation74:I136-42, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grande, K. J., K. S. Kunzelman, R. P. Cochran, T. E. David, and E. D. Verrier. Porcine aortic leaflet arrangement may contribute to clinical xenograft failure. ASAIO J.39:918-22, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hamid, M. S., H. N. Sabbah, and P. D. Stein. Influence of stent height upon stresses on the cusps of closed bioprosthetic valves. J. Biomech.19:759-69, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hamid, M. S., H. N. Sabbah, and P. D. Stein. Vibrational analysis of bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets using numerical models: Effects of leaflet stiffening, calcification, and perforation. Circ. Res.61:687-94, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Han, H. C., and Y. C. Fung. Longitudinal strain of canine and porcine aortas. J. Biomech.28:637-41, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hansen, B., A. H. Menkis, and I. Vesely. Longitudinal and radial distensibility of the porcine aortic root. Ann. Thorac. Surg.60:S384-90, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kalath, S., P. Tsipouras, and F. H. Silver. Non-invasive assessment of aortic mechanical properties. Ann. Biomed. Eng.14:513-24, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kitzman, D. W., D. G. Scholz, P. T. Hagen, D. M. Ilstrup, and W. D. Edwards. Age-related changes in normal human hearts during the first 10 decades of life. Part II (Maturity): A quantitative anatomic study of 765 specimens from subjects 20 to 99 years old. Mayo Clin. Proc.63:137-46, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kunzelman, K. S., R. P. Cochran, C. Chuong, W. S. Ring, E. D. Verrier, and R. D. Eberhart. Finite element analysis of the mitral valve. J. Heart Valve Disease2:326-40, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kunzelman, K. S., K. J. Grande, T. E. David, R. P. Cochran, and E. D. Verrier. Aortic root and valve relationships. Impact on surgical repair. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.107:162-70, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lo, D., and I. Vesely. Biaxial strain analysis of the porcine aortic valve. Ann. Thorac. Surg.60:S374-8, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peskin, C. S., and D. M. McQueen. A general method for the computer simulation of biological systems interacting with fluids. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.49:265-76, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reid, K. The anatomy of the sinus of Valsalva. Thorax25:79-85, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sabbah, H. N., M. S. Hamid, and P. D. Stein. Mechanical stresses on closed cusps of porcine bioprosthetic valves: Correlation with sites of calcification. Ann. Thorac. Surg.42:93-6, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sahasakul, Y., W. D. Edwards, J. M. Naessens, and A. J. Tajik. Age-related changes in aortic and mitral valve thickness: Implications for two-dimensional echocardiography based on an autopsy study of 200 normal human hearts. Am. J. Cardiol.62:424-30, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thubrikar, M. J., J. Aouad, and S. P. Nolan. Comparison of the in vivoand in vitromechanical properties of aortic valve leaflets. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.92:29-36, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thubrikar, M. J., S. P. Nolan, J. Aouad, and J. D. Deck. Stress sharing between the sinus and leaflets of canine aortic valve. Ann. Thorac. Surg.42:434-40, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vesely, I., and D. Boughner. Analysis of the bending behaviour of porcine xenograft leaflets and of neutral aortic valve material: bending stiffness, neutral axis and shear measurements. J. Biomech.22:655-71, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vesely, I., S. Krucinski, and G. Campbell. Micromechanics and mathematical modeling: An inside look at bioprosthetic valve function. J. Cardiol. Surg.7:85-95, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vesely, I., and R. Noseworthy. Micromechanics of the fibrosa and the ventricularis in aortic valve leaflets. J. Biomech.25:101-13, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

    K. Jane Grande

  2. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

    Richard P. Cochran & Karyn S. Kunzelman

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

    Per G. Reinhall

Authors
  1. K. Jane Grande
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard P. Cochran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Per G. Reinhall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karyn S. Kunzelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grande, K.J., Cochran, R.P., Reinhall, P.G. et al. Stress Variations in the Human Aortic Root and Valve: The Role of Anatomic Asymmetry. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 26, 534–545 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.122

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.122

Search

Navigation