Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic In Vitro Quantification of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Leaflet Motion Using Structured Light Projection

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantification of heart valve leaflet deformation during the cardiac cycle is essential in understanding normal and pathological valvular function, as well as in the design of replacement heart valves. Due to the technical complexities involved, little work to date has been performed on dynamic valve leaflet motion. We have developed a novel experimental method utilizing a noncontacting structured laser-light projection technique to investigate dynamic leaflet motion. Using a simulated circulatory loop, a matrix of 150–200 laser light points were projected over the entire leaflet surface. To obtain unobstructed views of the leaflet surface, a stereo system of high-resolution boroscopes was used to track the light points at discrete temporal points during the cardiac cycle. The leaflet surface at each temporal point was reconstructed in three dimensions, and fit using our biquintic hermite finite element approach (Smith et al., Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26:598–611, 2001). To demonstrate our approach, we utilized a bovine pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve, which revealed regions of complex flexural deformation and substantially different shapes during the opening and closing phases. In conclusion, the current method has high spatial and temporal resolution and can reconstruct the entire surface of the cusp simultaneously. Because it is completely noncontacting, this approach is applicable to studies of fatigue and bioreactor technology for tissue engineered heart valves. © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC01: 8719Hh, 8780-y, 4262Be, 8719St

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Bellhouse, B., and F. Bellhouse. Fluid mechanics of model normal and stenosed aortic valves. Circ. Res.25:693–704, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellhouse, B. J., and K. G. Reid. Fluid mechanics of the aortic valve. Br. Heart J.31:391, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Black, M. M., I. C. Howard, X. C. Huang, and E. A. Patterson. A three-dimensional analysis of a bioprosthetic heart valve. J. Biomech.24:793–801, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broom, N.Fatigue-induced damage in glutaraldehyde preserved heart valve tissue. Cardiovasc. Surg.76:202–211, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chandran, K. B., S. H. Kim, and G. Han. Stress distribution on the cusps of a polyurethane trileaflet heart valve prosthesis in the closed position. J. Biomech.24:385–395, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donn, A., G. Bernacca, T. Mackay, M. Gulbransen, and D. Wheatley. Laser profiling of bovine pericardial heart valves. Artif. Organs20:436–439, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fenner, J., T. Mackay, W. Martin, and D. Wheatley. Laser profiling: A technique for the study of prosthetic heart valve leaflet motion. Physiol. Meas.16:181–193, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrans, V. J., S. L. Hilbert, S. Fujita, M. Jones, and W. C. Roberts. Morphologic abnormalities in explanted bioprosthetic heart valves. In: Cardiovascular Pathology, edited by R. Virmani, J. Atkinson, and J. Fenoglio. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1991, pp. 373–398.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gabbay, S., P. Kadam, S. Factor, and T. K. Cheung. Do heart valves bioprostheses degenerate for metabolic or mechanical reasons?J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.55:208–215, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, Z. B., S. Pandya, N. Hosein, M. S. Sacks, and N. H. Hwang. Bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet motion monitored by dual camera stereo photogrammetry. J. Biomech.33:199–207, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gilliani, N. V.. Time-dependent laminar incompressible flow through a spherical cavity. J. Fluid Mech.78:99–127, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gloeckner, D. C., K. L. Billiar, and M. S. Sacks. Effects of mechanical fatigue on the bending properties of the porcine bioprosthetic heart valve. ASAIO J.45:59–63, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hamid, M. S., H. N. Sabbah, and P. D. Stein. Influence of stent height upon stresses on the cusps of closed bioprosthetic valves. J. Biomech.19:759–769, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hung, T. K., and G. B. Schuessler. An analysis of the hemodynamics of the opening of aortic valves. J. Biomech.10:597–606, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ishihara, T., V. J. Ferrans, S. W. Boyce, M. Jones, and W. C. Roberts. Structure and classification of cuspal tears and perforations in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves implanted in patients. Am. J. Cardiol.48:665–678, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Iyengar, A. K. S., E. G. Cape, and W. H. Neches. Dicrete subaortic stenosis: An in vitro study of the interaction between hemodynamics and aortic valve mechanics. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiography12:368, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Katz, N. M., M. J. Buckley, and R. R. Liberthson. Discrete membranous subaortic stenosis. Report of 31 patients, review of the literature, and delineation of management. Circulation56:1034–1038, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krucinski, S., I. Vesely, M. A. Dokainish, and G. Campbell. Numerical simulation of leaflet flexure in bioprosthetic valves mounted on rigid and expansile stents. J. Biomech.26:929–943, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lo, D., and I. Vesely. Biaxial strain analysis of the porcine aortic valve. Ann. Thorac. Surg.60:S374–S378, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Makihijani, V. B., Y. H. Dionne, P. J. Thubrikar. Three-dimensional coupled fluid-structure simulation of pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve function. ASAIO J.43:387–392, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marzan, G. T., K. H. A computer program for direct linear transformation solution of the collinearity condition and some applications of it. Proceedings of the Symposium on Close-Range Photogrammetric Systems, 1975, pp. 420–476.

  22. Mercer, J. L.The movements of the dog's aortic valve studied by high speed cineangiography. Br. J. Radiol.46:344–349, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newfeld, E. A., A. J. Muster, M. H. Paul, F. S. Idriss, and W. L. Riker. Discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis in childhood. Study of 51 patients. Am. J. Cardiol.38:53–61, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Patterson, E. A., I. C. Howard, and M. A. Thornton. A comparative study of linear and nonlinear simulations of the leaflets in a bioprosthetic heart valve during the cardiac cycle. J. Med. Eng. Technol.20:95–108, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peskin, C. S., and A. W. Wolfe. The aortic sinus vortex. Fed. Proc.37:2784–2792, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenburg, G. P. W., D. L. Landis, and W. S. Pierce. Design and evaluation of the Pennsylvania State University mock circulatory system. ASAIO J.4:41–49, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sacks, M. S., C. J. Chuong, G. H. Templeton, and R. Peshock. In vivo 3D reconstruction and geometric characterization of the right ventricular free wall. Ann. Biomed. Eng.21:263–275, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sacks, M., D. Gloeckner, N. Vyavahare, and R. Levy. Loss of flexural rigidity in bioprosthetic heart valves with fatigue: New findings and the relation to collagen damage. J. Heart Valve Dis. (in press).

  29. Schoen, F. D., and C. E. Hobson. Anatomic analysis of removed prosthetic heart valves: Causes of failure of 33 mechanical valves and 58 bioprostheses, Hum. Pathol.16:545–549, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schoen, F., and R. Levy. Pathology of substitute heart valves. J. Card. Surg.9:222–227, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, D. B., M. S. Sacks, P. M. Pattany, and R. Schroeder. Fatigue-induced changes in bioprosthetic heart valve three-dimensional geometry and the relation to tissue damage. J. Heart Valve Dis.8:25–33, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Smith, D. B., M. S. Sacks, D. A. Vorp, and M. Thornton. Surface geometric analysis of anatomic structures using biquintic finite element interpolation [In Process Citation]. Ann. Biomed. Eng.28:598–611, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Swanson, W. M., and R. E. Clark. Aortic valve leaflet motion during systole. Numerical-graphical determination. Circ. Res.32:42–48, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thornton, M. High speed dynamic, 3D surface imaging, In: Electrical Engineering. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario Press, 1996, p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thubrikar, M. The Aortic Valve. Boca Raton, FL: Chemical Rubber Corp., 1990, p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thubrikar, M., J. Deck, J. Aouad, and S. Nolan. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.86:115–125, 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. van Steenhoven, A. A., and M. E. H. van Dongen. Model studies of the closing behaviour of the aortic valve. J. Fluid Mech.20:21–32, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vesely, I., D. Boughner, and T. Song. Tissue buckling as a mechanism of bioprosthetic valve failure. Ann. Thorac. Surg.46:302–308, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wheatly, D. H., J. Fisher, I. J. Reece, T. Spyt, and P. Breeze. Primary tissue failure in pericardial heart valves. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.94:367–374, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wipperman, F.On the fluid dynamics of the aortic valve. J. Fluid Mech.159:487–501, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iyengar, A.K.S., Sugimoto, H., Smith, D.B. et al. Dynamic In Vitro Quantification of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Leaflet Motion Using Structured Light Projection. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29, 963–973 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1415523

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1415523

Navigation