Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of Orientation and Distribution of Cellular Alignment and Cytoskeletal Organization

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endothelial cells elongate and align with the direction of applied fluid shear stress. Previously, automated methods for analysis of cell orientation distribution have used Fourier- or fractal-based methods. We used intensity gradients in images of control and sheared endothelial cells to measure orientation distributions. Automated measurements of mean orientation and angular deviation compared favorably with manual measurements. There was a significantly greater angular deviation in images of control cells compared with sheared cells. Automated methods were also used to quantify organization of cytoskeletal fibers using the local angular deviation and a measure of the local coalignment of fibers called the coalignment ratio. The local angular deviation of microtubules and microfilaments was significantly smaller in sheared cells compared with control. The coalignment of cytoskeletal fibers was significantly greater in sheared cells. We conclude that image intensity gradients can be used rapidly, accurately, and objectively to measure cell orientation distributions and cytoskeletal filament organization. © 1999 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC99: 8716Ka, 8717-d, 8719Rr, 8764Rr, 0705Pj

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Chaudhuri, B. B., P. Kundu, and N. Sarkar. Detection and gradation of oriented texture. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 14:147–153, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dartsch, P. C., and E. Betz. Response of cultured endothelial cells to mechanical stimulation. Basic Res. Cardiol. 84:268–281, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dewey, Jr., C. F., S. R. Bussolari, M. A. Gimbrone, Jr., and P. F. Davies. The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. J. Biomech. Eng. 103:177–185, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eskin, S. G., C. L. Ives, L. V. McIntire, and L. T. Navarro. Response of cultured endothelial cells to steady flow. Microvasc. Res. 28:87–94, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher, N. I. Statistical Analysis of Circular Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frangos, J., S. Eskin, L. McIntire, and C. Ives. Flow effects on prostacyclin production by cultured human endothelial cells. Science 225:1477–1479, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galbraith, C. G., R. Skalak, and S. Chien. Shear stress induces spatial reorganization of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 40:317–330, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karlon, W. J., J. W. Covell, A. D. McCulloch, and J. H. Omens. Automated measurement of myofiber disarray in transgenic mice with ventricular expression of ras. Anat. Rec. 252:612–625, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kohler, M., M. Aufderheide, and D. Ramm. Method for the description of differences in the filamentous structure of the cytoskeleton in cultured cells. Toxicol. Lett. 72:33–42, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, T.-Y. J., A. Rosenthal, and A. I. Gotlieb. Transition of aortic endothelial cells from resting to migrating cells is associated with three sequential patterns of microfilament organization. J. Vasc. Res. 33:13–24, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levesque, M. J., and R. M. Nerem. The elongation and orientation of cultured endothelial cells in response to shear stress. J. Biomech. Eng. 107:341–347, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malek, A. M., and S. Izumo. Mechanism of endothelial cell shape change and cytoskeletal remodeling in response to fluid shear stress. J. Cell. Sci. 109(4):713–726, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer, B., and R. Bizios. Quantitative characterization of vascular endothelial cell morphology and orientation using Fourier transform analysis. J. Biomech. Eng. 119:159–165, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Petroll, W. M., H. D. Cavanagh, P. Barry, P. Andrews, and J. V. Jester. Quantitative analysis of stress fiber orientation during corneal wound contraction. J. Cell. Sci. 104:353–363, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Remuzzi, A., C. F. Dewey, Jr., P. F. Davies, and M. A. Gimbrone, Jr., Orientation of endothelial cells in shear fields in vitro. Biorheology 21:617–630, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sato, M., and N. Ohshima. Flow-induced changes in shape and cytoskeletal structure of vascular endothelial cells. Biorheology 31:143–153, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sterpetti, A. V., A. Cucina, L. Santoro D'Angelo, B. Cardillo, and A. Cavallaro. Response of arterial smooth muscle cells to laminar flow. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 33:619–624, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thomason, D. B., O. Anderson, II., and V. Menon. Fractal analysis of cytoskeleton rearrangement in cardiac muscle during head-down tilt. J. Appl. Physiol. 81:1522–1527, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thoumine, O., T. Ziegler, P. R. Girard, and R. M. Nerem. Elongation of confluent endothelial cells in culture: The importance of fields of force in the associated alterations of their cytoskeletal structure. Exp. Cell Res. 219:427–441, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vassy, J., M. Beil, T. Irinopoulou, and J. P. Rigaut. Quantitative image analysis of cytokeratin filament distribution during fetal rat liver development. Hepatology 23:630–638, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karlon, W.J., Hsu, PP., Li, S. et al. Measurement of Orientation and Distribution of Cellular Alignment and Cytoskeletal Organization. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 27, 712–720 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.226

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.226

Navigation