Skip to main content
Log in

Electrical Impedance Cardiography Using Artificial Neural Networks

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluates the use of artificial neural networks to estimate stroke volume from pre-processed, thoracic impedance plethysmograph signals from 20 healthy subjects. Standard back-propagation was used to train the networks, with Doppler stroke volume estimates as the desired output. The trained networks were then compared to two classical biophysical approaches. The coefficient of determination R2 × 100%) between the biophysical approaches and the Doppler was 8.20% and 9.90%, while it was 77.38% between the best neural network and the Doppler. Among these methods, only the neural network residuals had a significant zero mean Gaussian distribution (α =0.05). Our results indicate that an invertible relationship may exist between thoracic bioimpedance and stroke volume, and that artificial neural networks may offer a potentially advantageous approach for estimating stroke volume from thoracic electrical impedance, both because of their ease of use and their lack of confounding assumptions. © 1998 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC98: 8780+s, 8437+q, 8435+i, 0630Bp

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Berman, I., W. Scheetz, E. Jenkins, and H. Hufnagel. Transthoracic electrical impedance a guide to intravascular overload. Arch. Surg.102:61-64, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein, D. P. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: Theory and rationale. Crit. Care Medicine14:904-909, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Churchill, S. E. Fundamentals of Space Sciences, Vol. 1. Malabar, FL: Kreiger, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donovan, K., G. Dobb, W. Woods, and B. Hockings. Comparison of transthoracic electrical impedance and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output. Crit. Care Medicine14:1038-1044, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geddes, L. A. The Direct and Indirect Measurement of Blood Pressure. Chicago, IL: Yearbook Medical, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Handelsman, H. Cardiac output by electrical bioimpedance. Health Technology Assessment Report3:1-5, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haykin, S. Neural Networks - A Comprehensive Foundation. New York, NY: Macmillan College, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Judy, W., F. Langley, K. McCowen, D. Stinnett, L. Baker, and P. Johnson. Comparative evaluation of the thoracic impedance and isotope dilution methods for measuring cardiac output. Aerospace Medicine40:532-536, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kubicek, W. On the source of peak first time derivative (dz/dt) during impedance cardiography. Ann. Biomed. Eng.17:459-462, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kubicek, W., A. From, R. Patterson, D. Witsoe, A. Castaneda, R. Lillehei, and R. Ersek. Impedance cardiography as a noninvasive means to monitor cardiac function. J. Assoc. Adv. Medical Instrumen.4:79-84, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kubicek, W., J. Karnegis, R. Patterson, D. Witsoe, and R. Mattson. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerospace Medicine37:1208-1212, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kubicek, W., J. Kottke, M. Ramos, R. Patterson, D. Witsoe, J. Labree, W. Remole, T. Layman, H. Schoening, and J. Garamela. The Minnesota impedance cardiograph-theory and applications. Biomed. Eng.9:410-419, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar, A. A. R., B. C. Taylor, A. P. Mulavara, M. S. Nair, V. B. Gupta, and W. D. Timmons. A Neural network approach to electrical impedance cardiography, In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Baltimore, Maryland, 1994.

  14. Levett, J., and R. Replogle. Thermodilution cardiac output: a critical analysis and review of the literature. J. Surg. Res.27:392-404, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ljung, L. System Identification: Theory for the User. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luepker, R., J. Michael, and J. Warbasse. Transthoracic electrical impedance; quantitative evaluation of a non-invasive measure of thoracic fluid volume. Am. Heart J.85:83-93, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meijer, J., J. Reulen, P. Oe, W. Allon, L. Thijs, and H. Schneider. Differential impedance plethysmography for measuring thoracic impedance's. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp.20:187- 194, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller J., and S. Horvath. Impedance cardiography. Psychophysiology15:80-91, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nyober, J. Electrical Impedance Plethysmography. Spring-field, IL: Thomas C.C., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roos, J., H. Koomans, P. Boer, and E. D. Mees. Transthoracic electrical impedance as an index of extracellular fluid volume in man. Intensive Care Medicine11:39-42, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sramek, B. Cardiac output by electrical impedance. Med. Electron.1982:93-97 (April).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor, B. C. Evaluation of bioimpedance for the measurement of physiologic variables as related to hemodynamic studies in spaceflight. NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, NASA/ASEE Summer Faculty Fellowship Program, 1993.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulavara, A.P., Timmons, W.D., Nair, M.S. et al. Electrical Impedance Cardiography Using Artificial Neural Networks. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 26, 577–583 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.47

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.47

Navigation