Advertisement

Abstract

The multibillion-dollar trade in bushmeat is among the most immediate threats to the persistence of tropical vertebrates, but our understanding of its underlying drivers and effects on human welfare is limited by a lack of empirical data. We used 30 years of data from Ghana to link mammal declines to the bushmeat trade and to spatial and temporal changes in the availability of fish. We show that years of poor fish supply coincided with increased hunting in nature reserves and sharp declines in biomass of 41 wildlife species. Local market data provide evidence of a direct link between fish supply and subsequent bushmeat demand in villages and show bushmeat's role as a dietary staple in the region. Our results emphasize the urgent need to develop cheap protein alternatives to bushmeat and to improve fisheries management by foreign and domestic fleets to avert extinctions of tropical wildlife.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (brashares.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
J. G. Robinson, E. L. Bennett, Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 2000).
2
E. J. Milner-Gulland et al., Trends Ecol. Evol.18, 351 (2003).
3
J. G. Robinson, K. H. Redford, E. L. Bennett, Science284, 595 (1999).
4
World Conservation Union, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Animals (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 2000).
5
D. S. Wilkie, R. A. Godoy, Science287, 975 (2000).
6
E. L. Bennett, Conserv. Biol.16, 588 (2002).
7
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development Cooperation (OECD, Paris, 1996).
8
Y. Ntiamoa-Baidu, Wildlife Development Plan: 1998–2003 (Wildlife Department, Accra, Ghana, 1998).
9
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Africa Environment Outlook; available at www.unep.org/aeo.
10
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Country Profiles: Ghana; available at www.fao.org/countryprofiles/index.asp?iso3=GHA.
11
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Fisheries Databases; available at www.fao.org/fi/statist/statist.asp.
12
Statistics are based on a linear regression of annual change in mammal biomass [calculated as (kgt + 1)/kgt] against per capita fish harvest. Regressing per capita change in mammal biomass [i.e., (kgt + 1kgt)/human populationt + 1] against per capita fish catch gave a similar result (adjusted R2 = 0.52, P < 0.001).
13
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
14
J. Atta-Mills, J. Alder, U. R. Sumaila, Nat. Resour. Forum28, 13 (2004).
15
C. B. Barrett, P. Arcese, Land Econ.74, 449 (1998).
16
G. J. S. Dei, Ecol. Food Nutr.22, 225 (1989).
17
J. S. Brashares, P. Arcese, M. K. Sam, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B.268, 2473 (2001).
18
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2002; available at www.fao.org/docrep/005/y7300e/y7300e00.htm.
19
D. Pauly et al., Nature418, 689 (2002).
20
V. Christensenet al., in Pêcheries Maritimes, Ecosystèmes et Sociétés: Un Demi-Siècle de Changement, B.A. Moctar, P. Chavance, D. Gascuel, M. Vakily, D. Pauly, Eds. (Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Paris, 2004).
21
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), West Africa Puts EU To Shame (WWF European Policy Office, Brussels, 2001).
22
V. M. Kaczynski, D. L. Fluharty, Mar. Policy26, 75 (2002).
23
S. L. Pimm et al., Science293, 2207 (2001).
24
Sea Around Us Project (SAUP), Web Products: Marine Database; available at www.seaaroundus.org.
25
Ghana Marine Fisheries Research Division (MFRD), Oceanographic Data Centre, Marine database; available at www.ioc.unesco.org/odinafrica/contents.php?id=217.
26
We thank the Ghana Wildlife Division for permission to work in reserves and access to data, and we thank J. Atta-Mills for discussion. C. Kresge, P. Kresge, J. Mason, B. Volta, N. Ankudey, D. Boateng, L. Lanto, and G. Agbango provided assistance in Ghana, and C. Barrett, J. Hellmann, D. Pauly, I. Watson, J. Smith, V. Christensen, E. J. Milner-Gulland and four anonymous reviewers gave many helpful suggestions. Supported by NSF INT-0301935 (J.S.B.).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 306 | Issue 5699
12 November 2004

Submission history

Received: 7 July 2004
Accepted: 7 October 2004
Published in print: 12 November 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Supporting Online Material
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5699/1180/DC1
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S5
Tables S1 and S2
References

Authors

Affiliations

Justin S. Brashares* [email protected]
Conservation Biology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Peter Arcese
Centre for Applied Conservation Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Moses K. Sam
Ghana Wildlife Division, Accra, Ghana.
Peter B. Coppolillo
Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY 10460, USA.
A. R. E. Sinclair
Centre for Biodiversity Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Andrew Balmford
Conservation Biology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Percy Fitz Patrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Socio-economic factors correlating with illegal use of giraffe body parts, Oryx, (1-10), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060532200062X
    Crossref
  2. Determinants of bushmeat supply sources in rural areas of Côte d’Ivoire, Journal for Nature Conservation, 72, (126330), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126330
    Crossref
  3. A Conspectus of Strategies Towards Sustainable Floral Resources in the Context of Environmental and Socio-Economic Stability, South Asian Journal of Social Review, 1, 2, (80-88), (2022).https://doi.org/10.57044/SAJSR.2022.1.2.2212
    Crossref
  4. Implications of Urban Sustainability, Socio-Ecosystems, and Ecosystem Services, Research Anthology on Ecosystem Conservation and Preserving Biodiversity, (1314-1335), (2022).https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5678-1.ch063
    Crossref
  5. Widespread Use of Migratory Megafauna for Aquatic Wild Meat in the Tropics and Subtropics, Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, (2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.837447
    Crossref
  6. Does China’s poverty alleviation policy improve the quality of the ecological environment in poverty-stricken areas?, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, (2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1067339
    Crossref
  7. Toward a decade of ocean science for sustainable development through acoustic animal tracking, Global Change Biology, 28, 19, (5630-5653), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16343
    Crossref
  8. Economic incentives for the wildlife trade and costs of epidemics compared across individual, national, and global scales, Conservation Science and Practice, 4, 7, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12735
    Crossref
  9. Decline of the marabou stork ( Leptoptilos crumenifer ) in West Africa and the need for immediate conservation action , African Journal of Ecology, 61, 1, (102-117), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.13087
    Crossref
  10. Large African herbivore diversity is essential in transformed landscapes for conserving dung beetle diversity, Journal of Applied Ecology, 59, 5, (1372-1382), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14152
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media