Skip to main content
Log in

Intra- and Interpopulation Odontological Variability in the Gray Red-backed Vole (Craseomys rufocanus) and Yu.I. Chernov’s Compensation Principle

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

Methods of geometric morphometrics have been used to study geographic and chronographic forms of variation in the shape of the upper third molar (M3) in the gray red-backed vole C. rufocanus, a petrophilic rodent specialized to mountain habitats in the Urals. It has been shown that sexual dimorphism in M3 shape increases in the direction from the Southern to the Polar Urals. In the Middle Urals, differences in M3 shape (more distinct in males than in females) have been revealed between samples taken in years of high and low abundance of the species, which are apparently conditioned by a switch in tooth morphogenesis. This is suggestive of change in the morphofunctional properties of teeth and in related trophic preferences of males and females, i.e., in the possibility for them to consume different spectra of food resources. The increase in M3 sexual dimorphism in the south–north direction and in low-mountain biotopes (not common for the species) is in agreement with Chernov’s compensation principle manifested at the intra- and interpopulation levels, as it helps to alleviate trophic competition between males and females. The phenotypic plasticity of teeth provides for population-cenotic stability of the species in climatically unfavorable years and in atypical biotopes and environmental conditions of the Polar Ural Mountains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Pigliucci, M., Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis?, Evolution, 2007, vol. 61, pp. 2743–2749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickins, T. and Rahman, Q., The extended evolutionary synthesis and the role of soft inheritance in evolution, Proc. R. Soc. B, 2012, vol. 278, pp. 1721–1727.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laland, K.N., Uller, T., Feldman, M.W., et al., The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B.: Biol. Sci., 2015, vol. 282, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jablonka, E. and Raz, G., Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution, Q. Rev. Biol., 2009, vol. 84, pp. 131–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burggren, W., Epigenetic inheritance and its role in evolutionary biology: Re-evaluation and new perspectives, Biology, 2016, vol. 5, no. 24, pp. 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vasil’ev, A.G., Evolutionary ecology in the 21st century: New concepts and development prospects, Russ. J. Ecol., 2019, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner, G.P. and Draghi, J., Evolution of evolvability, in Evolution: The Extended Synthesis, Pigliucci, M. and Müller, G.B., Eds., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010, pp. 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schlichting, C.D. and Wund, M.A., Phenotypic plasticity and epigenetic marking: An assessment of evidence for genetic accommodation, Evolution, 2014, vol. 68, pp. 656–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sterelny, K., What is evolvability?, in Philosophy of Biology, Matthen, M. and Stephens, C., Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, pp. 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vasil’ev, A.G., Vasil’eva, I.A., and Shkurikhin, A.O., Geometricheskaya morfometriya: ot teorii k praktike (Geometric Morphometrics: From Theory to Practice), Moscow: KMK, 2018.

  11. Berdyugin, K.I., Bol’shakov, V.N., Balakhonov, V.S., et al., Mlekopitayushchie Polyarnogo Urala (Mammals of the Polar Urals), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Gos. Univ., 2007.

  12. Abramson, N.I., Petrova, T.P., Dokuchaev, N.E., et al., Phylogeography of the gray red-backed vole Craseomys rufocanus (Rodentia: Cricetidae) across the distribution range inferred from nonrecombining molecular markers, Russ. J. Theriol., 2012, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chernov, Yu.I., Species diversity and compensatory phenomena in communities an biotic systems, Zool. Zh., 2005, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 1221–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vasil’ev, A.G., Vasil’eva, I.A., Gorodilova, Yu.V., and Dobrinskii, N.L., Chernov’s compensation principle and the effect of rodent community completeness on the variability of bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) population in the Middle Urals, Russ. J. Ecol., 2017, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vasil’ev, A.G., Bol’shakov, V.N., Evdokimov, N.G., and Sineva, N.V., Morphological diversity of mole vole mono- and polymorphic populations: Does Chernov’s “compensation principle” work within a population?, Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2016, vol. 468, pp. 118–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vorontsov, N.N., The lower Cricetidae of the world fauna, part 1: Morphology and ecology, Fauna SSSR. Mlekopitayushchie (The Fauna of the Soviet Union), vol. 3, Leningrad: Nauka, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bol'shakov, V.N., Vasil’eva, I.A., and Maleeva, A.G., Morfotipicheskaya izmenchivost' zubov polevok (Morphotypic Variability of Teeth in Voles), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.

  18. Vasil’ev, A.G. and Vasil’eva, I.A., Gomologicheskaya izmenchivost’ morfologicheskikh struktur i epigeneticheskaya divergentsiya taksonov: Osnovy populyatsionnoi meronomii (Homological Variability of Morphological Structures and Epigenetic Divergence among Taxa: Principles of Population Meronomy), Moscow: KMK, 2009.

  19. Pokrovskii, A.V. and Bol’shakov, V.N., Eksperimental’naya ekologiya polevok (Experimental Ecology of Voles), Moscow: Nauka, 1979.

  20. Pavlinov, I.Ya. and Mikeshina, N.G., Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2002, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 473–493.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Voyta, L.L., Golenishchev, F.N., and Tiunov, M.P., Analysis of shape and size variation of the first lower molar in the far-eastern grey voles of genus Alexandromys (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from Russian fauna using geometric morphometrics, Russ. J. Theriol., 2013, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheets, H.D. and Zelditch, M.L., Studying ontogenetic trajectories using resampling methods and landmark data, Histrix, 2013, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rohlf, F.J. and Slice, D., Extension of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks, Syst. Zool., 1990, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zelditch, M.L., Swiderski, D.L., Sheets, H.D., and Fink, W.L., Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer, New York: Elsevier, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Klingenberg, C.P., MorphoJ: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2011, vol. 11, pp. 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rohlf, F.J., TpsUtil, Version 1.60, Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rohlf, F.J., TpsDig2: Digitize Landmarks and Outlines, Version 2.17, Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lovich, J.E. and Gibbons, J.W., A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism, Growth Dev. Aging, 1992, vol. 56, pp. 269–281.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Davis, J.C., Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, 2nd ed., New York: Wiley, 1986. Translated under the title Statisticheskii analiz dannykh v geologii, Moscow: Nedra, 1990, vol. 2.

  30. Hammer, Ø., New methods for the statistical analysis of point alignments, Comput. Geosci., 2009, vol. 35, pp. 659–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., and Ryan, P.D., PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis, Palaeontol. Electron., 2001, vol. 4, no. 1.

  32. Vasil’ev, A.G. and Lunev, A.V., Analysis of variation in the shape of M3 tooth in gray red-backed voles from the Visim Biosphere Reserve using the methods of geometric morphometrics, in Ekologicheskie issledovaniya v Visimskom biosfernom zapovednike: Mat-ly nauch. konf., posvyashch. 35-letiyu Visimskogo zapovednika (Ecological Studies in the Visim Biosphere Reserve: Proc. Sci. Conf. Dedicated to the 35th Anniversary of the Reserve), Yekaterinburg: Sredne-Ural. Knizhn. Izd., pp. 94–100.

  33. Olenev, G.V., Population mechanisms of adaptation to extreme environmental factors: The example of bank vole, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1981, no. 4, pp. 506–511.

  34. Borodin, A.V. and Markova, E.A., Keys to identify modern and Pleistocene arvicolines (Arvicolinae, Rodentia) from the Urals and Western Siberia based on odontological characteristics, Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2015, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 652–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to the Zoological Museum of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology (Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences) and personally to Dr. K.I. Berdyugin for providing the opportunity to work with the craniological collections and to A.V. Lunev for preparing the series of digital images of M3 teeth.

Funding

This study was performed under the State Contract no. AAAA-A19-119031890087-7 of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology and supported by the Integrated Research Program of the Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (project no. 18-4-4-28).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Vasil’ev.

Additional information

Translated by N. Gorgolyuk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vasil’ev, A.G., Bol’shakov, V.N. & Vasil’eva, I.A. Intra- and Interpopulation Odontological Variability in the Gray Red-backed Vole (Craseomys rufocanus) and Yu.I. Chernov’s Compensation Principle. Russ J Ecol 51, 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413620010130

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413620010130

Keywords:

Navigation